Study Stopped
Due to deteriorating operative and security conditions in the country, we were unable to continue meeting with the troops for data collection.
Sponsor study identifier
interventional
79
1 country
1
Study Start
March 14, 2022
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
February 27, 2024
Actual (reported)Study Completion
June 21, 2024
Actual (reported)Military service in combat units entails exposure to traumatic events that require mental adjustment. To develop and efficiently apply attentional interventions aimed at enhancing soldiers' combat performance, it is essential to extensively investigate the efficiency of these training programs, which has yet to been done. The prupose of the current study is to examine the efficiency of the new attention eye-tracking based training, in comparison to RT-based training and to a control group, in improving performance of combat soldiers. In addition, the influence of the attention training on aspects of psychological resilience will also be examined in questionnaires.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
June 21, 2024
Actual (reported)Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
March 14, 2022
Actual (reported)March 22, 2022
Actual (reported)April 1, 2022
Actual (reported)February 27, 2024
Actual (reported)June 21, 2024
Actual (reported)Change in Combat Performance
Composite scores for Static marksmanship, simulator shooting performance (Bagira), running test grades, and obstacle course grades will be gathered from soldiers' commanders before and after intervention sessions to test for change.
Approximately 3 months after baseline
Post-Combat Trauma
Change from baseline Post-Combat PTSD Symptoms at approximately 3 months
Post-Combat General Anxiety
Change from baseline Post-Combat General Anxiety Symptoms at approximately 3 months
Post-Combat Depression
Change from baseline Post-Combat Depression Symptoms at approximately 3 months
Post-Training RT-based Attention Bias toward threat
Change from baseline Attention Bias within 3 months of baseline measurement
Post-Training Subjective Attention Bias toward threat
Change from baseline Attention Bias within 3 months of baseline measurement
Post-Training Eye-tracking Attention Bias toward threat
Change from baseline Attention Bias within 3 months of baseline measurement
In the task, 30 different matrices, each consisting of 16 faces, will be presented. Each matrix includes 8 angry faces and 8 neutral, 8 women and 8 men, and the locations are counterbalanced between matrices. The participants are asked to view the matrices in any way they choose, and the eye-tracking camera records their viewing location relative to the stimuli presented on the screen. At the beginning of each training session, the soldier will choose to which music he would like to listen during the 12-minute session from a diverse list of music. After calibrating the eye-tracker, the participant will be instructed to view matrices of faces as he chooses, as described above in the assessment task. The music chosen by the participant will play only when he is looking at threatening faces and it will stop when he looks at neutral faces. Thus, a change in viewing patterns is expected by implementing operant conditioning principles.
A dot-probe task of 160 trials. Trials begins with a fixation cross (+), on which the participant is asked to focus (500ms). Then two face stimuli (one angry one neutral) are presented above and below the fixation cross (500ms). After the stimuli disappear, a target probe (right- or left-pointing arrowhead) appears in place of one of the face stimuli. The participant is asked to indicate which target probe was presented using a predetermined key. The target probe will remain on the screen until response, after which a new trial will begin. Participants are instructed to identify the probe type as quickly and accurately as possible. In the training task, all of the target probes will appear in the threat location (angry face). Thus, over multiple trials, learning is expected to occurs such that the threatening face predicts the location of the target probe, thereby achieving the desired change in attention pattern.
Feedback according to participants' viewing patterns, in order to modify their attention toward threat stimuli.
Attention training via repeated trials of a dot-probe task intended to direct attention toward threat stimuli using threat and neutral face stimuli.
Tel Aviv University
Tel Aviv, 6997801, Israel
Wald I, Fruchter E, Ginat K, Stolin E, Dagan D, Bliese PD, Quartana PJ, Sipos ML, Pine DS, Bar-Haim Y. Selective prevention of combat-related post-traumatic stress disorder using attention bias modification training: a randomized controlled trial. Psychol Med. 2016 Sep;46(12):2627-36. doi: 10.1017/S0033291716000945. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
Yair Bar-Haim, PhD
Tel Aviv University
79 participants (actual enrollment reported by the registry).
First Submitted
March 22, 2022
First Posted
April 1, 2022
Study Start
March 14, 2022
Actual (reported)This condition is also based on the eye-tracking task (see Experimental Arm) with a fundamental change - The music chosen by the soldier will play continuously without any reinforcement for looking at threat or neutral faces.
Participants listen to a musical track they chose with no operant conditioning.
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Primary Completion
February 27, 2024
Actual (reported)Study Completion
June 21, 2024
Actual (reported)Last Updated
July 9, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-07
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: