Increasing Psychological Resilience in Combat Soldiers Applying Advanced Eye-Tracking-Based Attention Bias Modification
1 other identifier
interventional
501
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Military service in combat units entails exposure to traumatic events that require mental adjustment. To develop and efficiently apply attention bias modification interventions aimed at enhancing soldiers' mental resilience, it is essential to test the efficiency of such training programs in RCTs. The purpose of the current study is to examine the efficiency of a new attention eye-tracking-based training protocol, in comparison to an RT-based training protocol, and to a control group, in reducing risk for post-trauma symptoms in combat deployed soldiers.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2021
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 30, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 8, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 24, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 14, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 21, 2024
CompletedApril 11, 2025
April 1, 2025
2.1 years
March 8, 2022
April 8, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Post-Combat PTSD Symptoms
Score on on self-report questionnaire Posttraumatic stress disorder checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). The total score, ranging from 0 to 80, reflects PTSD symptom severity, with higher scores representing greater severity.
Change from baseline Post-Combat PTSD Symptoms at approximately 1.5 years
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Post-Combat General Anxiety
Change from baseline Post-Combat General Anxiety Symptoms at approximately 1.5 years
Post-Combat Depression
Change from baseline Post-Combat Depression Symptoms at approximately 1.5 years
Other Outcomes (3)
Post-Training RT-based Attention Bias toward threat
Change from baseline Attention Bias within 6 months of baseline measurement
Post-Training Subjective Attention Bias toward threat
Change from baseline Attention Bias within 6 months of baseline measurement
Post-Training Eye-tracking Attention Bias toward threat
Change from baseline Attention Bias within 6 months of baseline measurement
Study Arms (3)
Gaze-Contingent Feedback Training (toward threat)
EXPERIMENTALIn the task, 30 different matrices, each consisting of 16 faces, will be presented. Each matrix includes 8 angry faces and 8 neutral, 8 women and 8 men, and the locations are counterbalanced between matrices. The participants are asked to view the matrices in any way they choose, and the eye-tracking camera records their viewing location relative to the stimuli presented on the screen. At the beginning of each training session, the soldier will choose to which music he would like to listen during the 12-minute session from a diverse list of music. After calibrating the eye-tracker, the participant will be instructed to view matrices of faces as he chooses, as described above in the assessment task. The music chosen by the participant will play only when he is looking at threatening faces and it will stop when he looks at neutral faces. Thus, a change in viewing patterns is expected by implementing operant conditioning principles.
RT-Based Attention Bias Modification (toward threat)
ACTIVE COMPARATORA dot-probe task of 160 trials. Trials begins with a fixation cross (+), on which the participant is asked to focus (500ms). Then two face stimuli (one angry one neutral) are presented above and below the fixation cross (500ms). After the stimuli disappear, a target probe (right- or left-pointing arrowhead) appears in place of one of the face stimuli. The participant is asked to indicate which target probe was presented using a predetermined key. The target probe will remain on the screen until response, after which a new trial will begin. Participants are instructed to identify the probe type as quickly and accurately as possible. In the training task, all of the target probes will appear in the threat location (angry face). Thus, over multiple trials, learning is expected to occurs such that the threatening face predicts the location of the target probe, thereby achieving the desired change in attention pattern.
Neutral Control
PLACEBO COMPARATORThis condition is also based on the dot-probe task (see Active Comparator) with a fundamental difference. In this task, only neutral faces will be displayed, and therefore, while participants are exposed to the same task parameters, there will be no attention training and there will be no exposure to threat stimuli.
Interventions
Feedback according to participants' viewing patterns, in order to modify their attention toward threat stimuli.
Attention training via repeated trials of a dot-probe task intended to direct attention toward threat stimuli using threat and neutral face stimuli.
Dot-probe task using only neutral stimuli with no training toward threat
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Each soldier from the allocated cohort who gives written consent will be able to participate in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Hebrew proficiency is insufficient to complete the study questionnaires.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Tel Aviv University
Tel Aviv, 6997801, Israel
Related Publications (1)
Wald I, Fruchter E, Ginat K, Stolin E, Dagan D, Bliese PD, Quartana PJ, Sipos ML, Pine DS, Bar-Haim Y. Selective prevention of combat-related post-traumatic stress disorder using attention bias modification training: a randomized controlled trial. Psychol Med. 2016 Sep;46(12):2627-36. doi: 10.1017/S0033291716000945. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
PMID: 27377418BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yair Bar-Haim, PhD
Tel Aviv University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 8, 2022
First Posted
March 24, 2022
Study Start
June 30, 2021
Primary Completion
August 14, 2023
Study Completion
June 21, 2024
Last Updated
April 11, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share