NCT05295771

Brief Summary

Teenage children and adults often undergo orthodontic treatment each year to improve their dental esthetics and chewing function. One common problem they present with is having a small maxilla compared to the mandible. The standard of treatment to correct this issue is to expand the maxilla using either a tooth-anchored expander, a bone-anchored expander, or braces. Unfortunately, these treatment options can sometimes result in a loss of gum tissue and supporting structures of the teeth. Certain patients, especially ones that have thin gum tissue, are at a higher risk of this gum tissue loss. Orthodontic treatment for these patients will expand their jaw, causing further pressure on already thin gums. An increasingly common treatment to prevent this is to proactively modify patient's thin tissue surgically prior to their orthodontic treatment so they can withstand the tooth movement. The gold standard of doing this surgical intervention consists of harvesting a connective tissue from the palate which is not well tolerated by the younger population. Our study will evaluate the use of a biomaterial substitute instead of harvesting the patient's own tissue to thicken the gingival tissues. Surgical healing, patient satisfaction, pain index, as well as tissue contour post orthodontic treatment will be assessed thoroughly. This study will help us understand: 1) if biomaterials can be a substitute for traditional autogenous gum grafts to help thicken the patient's gum tissue prior to orthodontic treatment, and 2) if they are able to withstand the pressure of orthodontic movement. This will be the first long-term study of this kind.

Trial Health

30
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2022

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 23, 2021

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 25, 2022

Completed
7 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2022

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 23, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 23, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

January 25, 2024

Status Verified

January 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1.8 years

First QC Date

December 23, 2021

Last Update Submit

January 23, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Keratinized Tissue Thickness

    The thickness of the keratinized gingiva will be measured on the mid buccal of the tooth 1 mm apical to the gingival margin using an endo- reamer at the site of surgical intervention.

    Before orthodontic treatment commences on average 4 weeks after surgery.

  • Keratinized Tissue Width

    Measure the width from the free gingival margin to the mucogingival junction at the site of surgical intervention.

    12 weeks after surgery

  • Keratinized Tissue Width

    Measure the width from the free gingival margin to the mucogingival junction at the site of surgical intervention.

    24 weeks after surgery

  • Gingival margin level in relation to the Cemento Enamel Junction CEJ

    The gingival margin will either be at the CEJ, apical to it or coronal to it at the site of surgical intervention.

    12 weeks after surgery

  • Gingival margin level in relation to the Cemento Enamel Junction CEJ

    The gingival margin will either be at the CEJ, apical to it or coronal to it at the site of surgical intervention.

    24 weeks after surgery

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Duration of Surgery

    Day of surgical intervention

  • Visual Analog Score for Pain

    One day after surgery.

  • Visual Analog Score for Pain

    2 weeks after surgery.

  • Visual Analog Score for Discomfort

    One day after surgery.

  • Visual Analog Score for Discomfort

    2 weeks after surgery.

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Test arm

EXPERIMENTAL

Geistlich Fibro-Gide ®.

Procedure: Gingival Phenotype Modification

Control

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Autogenous Connective Tissue Graft.

Procedure: Gingival Phenotype Modification

Interventions

Autogenous Connective Tissue Graft is the current gold standard for soft tissue phenotype modification. This is being compared with a substitute material called Geistlich Fibro-Gide ® for soft tissue phenotype modification before orthodontic treatment. Geistlich Fibro-Gide ® is a porcine, porous, resorbable and volume-stable collagen matrix, designed for soft-tissue regeneration. Surgical flap design will be an envelope for both interventions.

ControlTest arm

Eligibility Criteria

Age13 Years - 17 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • presence of all permanent dentition, presence of unilateral or bilateral cross-bite or transverse maxillary deficiency,
  • subjects must have at least one tooth with thin gingival phenotype on maxillary canines, premolars or first molars (mesial root only) on either side;
  • teeth should have less than 2 mm of keratinized gingiva to be considered for surgical intervention
  • subjects should be systemically health.

You may not qualify if:

  • patients with Class V restorations or abfractions that obliterate cementoenamel junction
  • patients with active caries or endodontically involved teeth
  • immunocompromised patients that can influence wound healing
  • patients with parafunctional habits
  • patient with any history of smoking
  • pregnant or lactating females
  • teeth that have greater than Miller grade I mobility.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Alberta, Kaye Edmonton Clinic

Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2H5, Canada

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Malocclusion

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Tooth DiseasesStomatognathic Diseases

Study Officials

  • Monica P Gibson, BDS,MS(Perio),PhD,FRCD(C)

    U of Alberta Co-Director,Perio Graduate Prog,Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry-Dentistry Dept

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
0

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: 30 patients with bilaterally thin gingival phenotype and minimal keratinized tissues will be treated randomly (left or right maxillary site to be randomized) with either Geistlich Fibro- Gide ® (Test arm) on one side and Autogenous Connective Tissue Graft (Control arm) on the contralateral side of the mouth.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 23, 2021

First Posted

March 25, 2022

Study Start

April 1, 2022

Primary Completion

January 23, 2024

Study Completion

January 23, 2024

Last Updated

January 25, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-01

Locations