Tow Maxillary Hybrid Expanders Screw Supported Versus Lateral Angulated One; a Prospective Randomized Clinical Study
Comparison of Tow Maxillary Hybrid Expanders -Perpendicular Screw Supported Versus Lateral Angulated One; a Prospective Randomized Clinical Study
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
in this study i will use to different designs of t maxillary hybrid expanders that consists of HYREX supported with tow miniscrews to treat the collapsed maxilla in Yonge adolescents
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2021
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 10, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 3, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 18, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 10, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 14, 2023
CompletedJanuary 18, 2022
January 1, 2022
1.9 years
January 3, 2022
January 3, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
change in maxillary width
millimeter
12 weeks following end of treatment
Study Arms (2)
group (1)
EXPERIMENTALtow perpendicular miniscrews supported hybrid expanders
group (2)
EXPERIMENTALtow angulated miniscrews supported hybrid expanders
Interventions
tow maxillary hybrid expanders supported anteriorly with tow miniscrews
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Medically free male or female patients
- Patients that necessitated maxillary expansion due to constricted maxillary arch shown by a unilateral or bilateral posterior crossbite.
- The patient should have no missing teeth except third molars.
- Age ranged from 12 to 18 years old.
- The patient should have a good gingival condition.
- The patient should have a good periodontal condition.
You may not qualify if:
- hisory of previous orthodontic treatment. 2- Lack of cooperation. 3- Mental problems. 4- Skeletal open bite. 5- TMJ problem.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Al azhar university
Cairo, 11311, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Comparison of tow maxillary hybrid expanders -perpendicular screw Supported versus lateral angulated one; a prospective randomized clinical study
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 3, 2022
First Posted
January 18, 2022
Study Start
July 10, 2021
Primary Completion
June 10, 2023
Study Completion
October 14, 2023
Last Updated
January 18, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-01