Percutaneous Versus Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Liver Biopsy (PEREUS)
PEREUS
Prospective, Randomized, Comparative, Non-inferiority, Multicentre Trial of Quality of Samples Obtained by Percutaneous Liver Biopsy Versus Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Liver Biopsy
1 other identifier
interventional
92
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Although the use of liver biopsy (LB) has decreased with the emerging non-invasive markers and techniques to evaluate liver fibrosis, histopathologic examination of liver tissue is necessary to confirm the type of liver injury. The aim of our study is to compare two methods for obtaining histological material from the liver: the percutaneous liver biopsy (PLB) and the Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided liver biopsy (EUS-LB)
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 16, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 19, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 25, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2022
CompletedMarch 1, 2023
February 1, 2023
8 months
January 16, 2022
February 28, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Quality of tissue samples obtained by EUS-guided liver biopsy compared to percutaneous liver biopsy.
The quality of samples is based in the combination of a specimen length \>20 mms and more than 10 complete portal triads (both conditions are required).
Up to 2 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Diagnostic accuracy of EUS-guided liver biopsy compared to percutaneous liver biopsy.
Up to 2 weeks
Adverse events associated with EUS-guided liver biopsy compared to percutaneous liver biopsy.
At 1 hour, 4 hours, 24 hours, 7 days, and 30 days
Patient satisfaction after EUS-guided liver biopsy compared to percutaneous liver biopsy.
24 hours
Study Arms (2)
PERCUTANEOUS LIVER BIOPSY (PLB)
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients randomized to percutaneous liver biopsy.
ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND GUIDED LIVER BIOPSY (EUS - LB)
EXPERIMENTALPatients randomized to EUS-guided liver biopsy
Interventions
Percutaneous liver biopsy using a 16 gauge (G) Trucut needle.
EUS-guided liver biopsy using a 19 gauge (G) Franseen core EUS needle
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age over 18 years, any gender
- Understanding and informed consent signed
- Fit for deep sedation
You may not qualify if:
- Age below 18 years
- Not signed informed consent
- Contraindication for a deep sedation
- Pregnancy
- Focal liver lesion that requires biopsy visualized by other imaging techniques
- Coagulopathy (INR\>1.5 or platelets \< 50,000)
- Inability to withdraw anticoagulant or antithrombotic agents
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital Clinico Universitario de Santiago
Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, 15706, Spain
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
J. Enrique Dominguez-Muñoz, MD, PhD
Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director of the Department of Gastroenterology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 16, 2022
First Posted
March 25, 2022
Study Start
January 19, 2022
Primary Completion
September 1, 2022
Study Completion
December 1, 2022
Last Updated
March 1, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share