NCT05289401

Brief Summary

comparison between the erector spinae block and caudal block with the aid of the of ultra sound in children as regard time of request of rescue analgesia , degree of intra and post operative pain relief , effect of hemodynamic stability and incidences of complication in open renal surgeries .

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2021

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2021

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2022

Completed
28 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2022

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 13, 2022

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 21, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

March 21, 2022

Status Verified

March 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

March 13, 2022

Last Update Submit

March 13, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

erector spinae block , caudal block

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • primary outcome

    The first time to require rescue analgesia in minutes (from the time of erector spinae block or caudal injection to the first registration of CHEOPS pain score more than 6)

    at the time of transfer from PACU and then at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 and 12 hours postoperatively

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • secondary outcome

    at time of transfer to PACU and then at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 and 12 hours.

Study Arms (2)

ESPB

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Unilateral erector spinae block will be performed in the lateral position . 0.5 mL/Kg of bupivacaine 0.125% will be injected taking care not to exceed the maximum recommended dose (2 mg/kg of bupivacaine)

Other: ultrasound guided blocks

CB

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

caudal block performed in lateral position . bolus of 1.2 ml/Kg bupivacaine 0.125% .

Other: ultrasound guided blocks

Interventions

Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Ultrasound Guided Caudal Block in Pediatric

CBESPB

Eligibility Criteria

Age2 Years - 6 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients 2-6 years old.
  • American society of anesthesiologists classification (ASA) I and II .
  • Patients undergoing unilateral open renal surgeries.

You may not qualify if:

  • Refusal of block.
  • Bleeding disorders (platelets count \< 150,000; INR \>1.5; PC\< 60%).
  • Skin lesion, wounds or infection at the puncture site.
  • Known allergy to local anesthetic drugs.
  • Contraindications to neuraxial block as sepsis, severe aortic stenosis, increased intracranial pressure.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Cairo University

Cairo, C, 11211, Egypt

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Agnosia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Perceptual DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
M.Sc

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 13, 2022

First Posted

March 21, 2022

Study Start

January 1, 2021

Primary Completion

February 1, 2022

Study Completion

March 1, 2022

Last Updated

March 21, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-03

Locations