The Efficacy of Balance and Proprioception Exercises in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis
1 other identifier
interventional
89
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aime to investigate the effects of balance and proprioception exercises using two different methods (classical balance training and Balance System™ SD) in addition to strengthening exercises on dynamic balance, pain, functional status and quality of life in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable knee-osteoarthritis
Started May 2014
Typical duration for not_applicable knee-osteoarthritis
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 1, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 18, 2022
CompletedMarch 18, 2022
March 1, 2022
2 years
March 1, 2022
March 10, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Dynamic balance
The postural stability test, was performed with the following parameters: Duration: 20 seconds, Stability level: 8, and Stance: two legs. The value of overall stability index (OSI) is obtained by calculating the standard deviations of the degrees of inclination with respect to the zero point (locked position). Higher values indicate poorer equilibrium.
Baseline
Dynamic balance
The postural stability test, was performed with the following parameters: Duration: 20 seconds, Stability level: 8, and Stance: two legs. The value of overall stability index (OSI) is obtained by calculating the standard deviations of the degrees of inclination with respect to the zero point (locked position). Higher values indicate poorer equilibrium.
10th week
Dynamic balance
The modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction and Balance (mCTSIB).The entire test is performed with the platform in the locked position. The test consists of 4 conditions: Condition 1: eyes open firm surface, Condition 2: eyes closed firm surface, Condition 3: eyes open dynamic (foam) surface, and Condition 4: eyes closed dynamic (foam) surface. The firm and dynamic surface tests assess static and dynamic balance, respectively. The conditions under which visual data are blocked are designed to detect even minor balance disturbances caused by the sensorimotor system. The sway index obtained as a result of the test represents the average position of the patient's center of mass relative to the center of the platform. Higher values indicate poorer balance. mCTSIB Condition-3, and mCTSIB Condition-4 dynamic balance assessment tests were used to assess dynamic balance.
Baseline
Dynamic balance
The modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction and Balance (mCTSIB).The entire test is performed with the platform in the locked position. The test consists of 4 conditions: Condition 1: eyes open firm surface, Condition 2: eyes closed firm surface, Condition 3: eyes open dynamic (foam) surface, and Condition 4: eyes closed dynamic (foam) surface. The firm and dynamic surface tests assess static and dynamic balance, respectively. The conditions under which visual data are blocked are designed to detect even minor balance disturbances caused by the sensorimotor system. The sway index obtained as a result of the test represents the average position of the patient's center of mass relative to the center of the platform. Higher values indicate poorer balance. mCTSIB Condition-3, and mCTSIB Condition-4 dynamic balance assessment tests were used to assess dynamic balance.
10th week
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Pain score
Baseline
Pain score
10th week
Physical function
Baseline
Physical function
10th week
Physical function
Baseline
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Biodex Training (BT) group
ACTIVE COMPARATORBiodex Balance System features a platform that can move simultaneously in the anteroposterior (AP) or medio-lateral (ML) direction in 12 different levels of stability within a 20-degree range of inclination, as well as a locked position for static environments. For this platform, 1 represents the least stable level and 12 represents the most stable level. Interactive, game-like training modes are provided with the on-screen grid and score-keeping functions. Patients in the BT group performed exercises with the Balance SystemTM SD once a day, three days a week for 10 weeks under the physicians' supervision. Furthermore this group received closed kinetic chain exercises (CKCE) in addition to their own exercise program, which was applied in exactly the same way. The CKCE were performed in three sets of 10 repetitions with five seconds rest between each exercise. The exercises consisted of mini-squats, wall sits, and lunges.
Classical balance training group (CT group)
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in the CT group completed the exercise program once a day and three days a week during the 10-week period under the physicians' supervision. The exercises consisted of standing on one leg, tandem walking (heel-to-toe), balance board exercises, Romberg exercise, backward walking, and side-to-side stepping exercises. The total duration of these exercises was 20-30 minutes. Furthermore this group also received CKCE in addition to their own exercise program, which was applied in exactly the same way. The CKCE were performed in three sets of 10 repetitions with five seconds rest between each exercise. The exercises consisted of mini-squats, wall sits, and lunges.
Control group
ACTIVE COMPARATORIsometric home exercises, which can be considered the most basic and feasible strengthening program, were selected to compare the effects they had when added to the intervention groups and administered alone. All patients in the study performed isometric exercises for the quadriceps and hamstrings at home once a day, three days a week for 10 weeks. The exercises were performed as 10 repetitive cycles of six-second contractions and two-second rest periods. All patients were given a daily exercise chart to mark the home program, and adherence to the exercises was monitored weekly by telephone call.
Interventions
Balance and proprioception exercises using two different methods (classical balance training and Biodex) in addition to strengthening exercises
Isometric exercises for the quadriceps and hamstrings at home
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients were included if they had a knee OA diagnosis according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) diagnostic criteria, had suffered from knee pain for at least six months, had radiologically verified bilateral knee OA of grade II or III according to the Kellgren-Lawrence classification and had not previously participated in a regular exercise program.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who had undergone knee surgery, who had received hyaluronic acid or corticosteroid injections into the knee within six months, and patients with conditions that might affect balance were excluded from the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Izmir Bozyaka Research and Training Hostpital
Izmir, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (5)
Jordan JM, Helmick CG, Renner JB, Luta G, Dragomir AD, Woodard J, Fang F, Schwartz TA, Abbate LM, Callahan LF, Kalsbeek WD, Hochberg MC. Prevalence of knee symptoms and radiographic and symptomatic knee osteoarthritis in African Americans and Caucasians: the Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project. J Rheumatol. 2007 Jan;34(1):172-80.
PMID: 17216685BACKGROUNDAnwer S, Alghadir A, Brismee JM. Effect of Home Exercise Program in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2016 Jan-Mar;39(1):38-48. doi: 10.1519/JPT.0000000000000045.
PMID: 25695471BACKGROUNDNiino N, Tsuzuku S, Ando F, Shimokata H. Frequencies and circumstances of falls in the National Institute for Longevity Sciences, Longitudinal Study of Aging (NILS-LSA). J Epidemiol. 2000 Apr;10(1 Suppl):S90-4. doi: 10.2188/jea.10.1sup_90.
PMID: 10835834BACKGROUNDKhan SJ, Khan SS, Usman J, Mokhtar AH, Abu Osman NA. Effects of different foot progression angles and platform settings on postural stability and fall risk in healthy and medial knee osteoarthritic adults. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2018 Feb;232(2):163-171. doi: 10.1177/0954411917750409. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
PMID: 29283019BACKGROUNDJan MH, Lin CH, Lin YF, Lin JJ, Lin DH. Effects of weight-bearing versus nonweight-bearing exercise on function, walking speed, and position sense in participants with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Jun;90(6):897-904. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.11.018.
PMID: 19480863BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
BUGRA INCE, MD
Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital
- STUDY DIRECTOR
ALTINAY GOKSEL KARATEPE, MD
University of Health Sciences Izmır Faculty, Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The patients, the outcome assessor, care provider physicians, and the statistician were blinded to allocation. The supervising physician was not blinded.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 1, 2022
First Posted
March 18, 2022
Study Start
May 1, 2014
Primary Completion
May 1, 2016
Study Completion
June 1, 2016
Last Updated
March 18, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
upon request