NCT05287802

Brief Summary

This study aime to investigate the effects of balance and proprioception exercises using two different methods (classical balance training and Balance System™ SD) in addition to strengthening exercises on dynamic balance, pain, functional status and quality of life in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
89

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable knee-osteoarthritis

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2014

Typical duration for not_applicable knee-osteoarthritis

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2014

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2016

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2016

Completed
5.8 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 1, 2022

Completed
17 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 18, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

March 18, 2022

Status Verified

March 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

March 1, 2022

Last Update Submit

March 10, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Dynamic balance

    The postural stability test, was performed with the following parameters: Duration: 20 seconds, Stability level: 8, and Stance: two legs. The value of overall stability index (OSI) is obtained by calculating the standard deviations of the degrees of inclination with respect to the zero point (locked position). Higher values indicate poorer equilibrium.

    Baseline

  • Dynamic balance

    The postural stability test, was performed with the following parameters: Duration: 20 seconds, Stability level: 8, and Stance: two legs. The value of overall stability index (OSI) is obtained by calculating the standard deviations of the degrees of inclination with respect to the zero point (locked position). Higher values indicate poorer equilibrium.

    10th week

  • Dynamic balance

    The modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction and Balance (mCTSIB).The entire test is performed with the platform in the locked position. The test consists of 4 conditions: Condition 1: eyes open firm surface, Condition 2: eyes closed firm surface, Condition 3: eyes open dynamic (foam) surface, and Condition 4: eyes closed dynamic (foam) surface. The firm and dynamic surface tests assess static and dynamic balance, respectively. The conditions under which visual data are blocked are designed to detect even minor balance disturbances caused by the sensorimotor system. The sway index obtained as a result of the test represents the average position of the patient's center of mass relative to the center of the platform. Higher values indicate poorer balance. mCTSIB Condition-3, and mCTSIB Condition-4 dynamic balance assessment tests were used to assess dynamic balance.

    Baseline

  • Dynamic balance

    The modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction and Balance (mCTSIB).The entire test is performed with the platform in the locked position. The test consists of 4 conditions: Condition 1: eyes open firm surface, Condition 2: eyes closed firm surface, Condition 3: eyes open dynamic (foam) surface, and Condition 4: eyes closed dynamic (foam) surface. The firm and dynamic surface tests assess static and dynamic balance, respectively. The conditions under which visual data are blocked are designed to detect even minor balance disturbances caused by the sensorimotor system. The sway index obtained as a result of the test represents the average position of the patient's center of mass relative to the center of the platform. Higher values indicate poorer balance. mCTSIB Condition-3, and mCTSIB Condition-4 dynamic balance assessment tests were used to assess dynamic balance.

    10th week

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Pain score

    Baseline

  • Pain score

    10th week

  • Physical function

    Baseline

  • Physical function

    10th week

  • Physical function

    Baseline

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Biodex Training (BT) group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Biodex Balance System features a platform that can move simultaneously in the anteroposterior (AP) or medio-lateral (ML) direction in 12 different levels of stability within a 20-degree range of inclination, as well as a locked position for static environments. For this platform, 1 represents the least stable level and 12 represents the most stable level. Interactive, game-like training modes are provided with the on-screen grid and score-keeping functions. Patients in the BT group performed exercises with the Balance SystemTM SD once a day, three days a week for 10 weeks under the physicians' supervision. Furthermore this group received closed kinetic chain exercises (CKCE) in addition to their own exercise program, which was applied in exactly the same way. The CKCE were performed in three sets of 10 repetitions with five seconds rest between each exercise. The exercises consisted of mini-squats, wall sits, and lunges.

Other: Balance and proprioception exercises

Classical balance training group (CT group)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients in the CT group completed the exercise program once a day and three days a week during the 10-week period under the physicians' supervision. The exercises consisted of standing on one leg, tandem walking (heel-to-toe), balance board exercises, Romberg exercise, backward walking, and side-to-side stepping exercises. The total duration of these exercises was 20-30 minutes. Furthermore this group also received CKCE in addition to their own exercise program, which was applied in exactly the same way. The CKCE were performed in three sets of 10 repetitions with five seconds rest between each exercise. The exercises consisted of mini-squats, wall sits, and lunges.

Other: Balance and proprioception exercises

Control group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Isometric home exercises, which can be considered the most basic and feasible strengthening program, were selected to compare the effects they had when added to the intervention groups and administered alone. All patients in the study performed isometric exercises for the quadriceps and hamstrings at home once a day, three days a week for 10 weeks. The exercises were performed as 10 repetitive cycles of six-second contractions and two-second rest periods. All patients were given a daily exercise chart to mark the home program, and adherence to the exercises was monitored weekly by telephone call.

Other: Home exercises program

Interventions

Balance and proprioception exercises using two different methods (classical balance training and Biodex) in addition to strengthening exercises

Biodex Training (BT) groupClassical balance training group (CT group)

Isometric exercises for the quadriceps and hamstrings at home

Control group

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years - 70 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients were included if they had a knee OA diagnosis according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) diagnostic criteria, had suffered from knee pain for at least six months, had radiologically verified bilateral knee OA of grade II or III according to the Kellgren-Lawrence classification and had not previously participated in a regular exercise program.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who had undergone knee surgery, who had received hyaluronic acid or corticosteroid injections into the knee within six months, and patients with conditions that might affect balance were excluded from the study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Izmir Bozyaka Research and Training Hostpital

Izmir, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Jordan JM, Helmick CG, Renner JB, Luta G, Dragomir AD, Woodard J, Fang F, Schwartz TA, Abbate LM, Callahan LF, Kalsbeek WD, Hochberg MC. Prevalence of knee symptoms and radiographic and symptomatic knee osteoarthritis in African Americans and Caucasians: the Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project. J Rheumatol. 2007 Jan;34(1):172-80.

    PMID: 17216685BACKGROUND
  • Anwer S, Alghadir A, Brismee JM. Effect of Home Exercise Program in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2016 Jan-Mar;39(1):38-48. doi: 10.1519/JPT.0000000000000045.

    PMID: 25695471BACKGROUND
  • Niino N, Tsuzuku S, Ando F, Shimokata H. Frequencies and circumstances of falls in the National Institute for Longevity Sciences, Longitudinal Study of Aging (NILS-LSA). J Epidemiol. 2000 Apr;10(1 Suppl):S90-4. doi: 10.2188/jea.10.1sup_90.

    PMID: 10835834BACKGROUND
  • Khan SJ, Khan SS, Usman J, Mokhtar AH, Abu Osman NA. Effects of different foot progression angles and platform settings on postural stability and fall risk in healthy and medial knee osteoarthritic adults. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2018 Feb;232(2):163-171. doi: 10.1177/0954411917750409. Epub 2017 Dec 28.

    PMID: 29283019BACKGROUND
  • Jan MH, Lin CH, Lin YF, Lin JJ, Lin DH. Effects of weight-bearing versus nonweight-bearing exercise on function, walking speed, and position sense in participants with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Jun;90(6):897-904. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.11.018.

    PMID: 19480863BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis, KneeSomatosensory Disorders

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

OsteoarthritisArthritisJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic DiseasesSensation DisordersNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • BUGRA INCE, MD

    Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • ALTINAY GOKSEL KARATEPE, MD

    University of Health Sciences Izmır Faculty, Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The patients, the outcome assessor, care provider physicians, and the statistician were blinded to allocation. The supervising physician was not blinded.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: This study was planned to compare the effects of isometric strengthening exercises plus balance and proprioception exercises performed by two different methods with isometric strengthening exercises alone. This was a single-center randomized trial with 3 parallel arms
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 1, 2022

First Posted

March 18, 2022

Study Start

May 1, 2014

Primary Completion

May 1, 2016

Study Completion

June 1, 2016

Last Updated

March 18, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

upon request

Locations