Hypnosis in Working Memory Rehabilitation
Releasing Residual Cognitive Capacity After Acquired Brain Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial Using Hypnotic Suggestion in Rehabilitation of Working Memory
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Establishment of effective, efficient, and evidence-based interventions in rehabilitation of working memory (WM) deficits after acquired brain injury (ABI) is sorely needed. Despite robust evidence for the usefulness of clinical hypnosis in a wide range of clinical conditions, and improved understanding of mechanisms underlying it ́s effects, the potential of clinical hypnosis in cognitive rehabilitation is virtually unexplored. The current study seeks to replicate resent intriguing findings where large effects of hypnotic suggestion were seen on WM capacity following ABI, and further, explore underlying mechanisms of change.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 9, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 18, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 15, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2024
CompletedNovember 8, 2022
November 1, 2022
1.6 years
March 9, 2022
November 7, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change in WM on neuropsychological tests
Measured by the WM Index WAIS IV
Change from Baseline (T1) to immediately after the intervention period (T2) and 8 months after Baseline (T3)
Change in WM-related symptoms in everyday life
Assessed with the WM subscale from the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive functioning Adult version (BRIEF-A) on a 3-point scale: Never a problem, sometimes a problem or often a problem. Higher scaled score indicates higher level of problems with WM.
Change from Baseline (T1) to immediately after the intervention period (T2) and 8 months after Baseline (T3)
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Change in cognitive composite score as seen on neuropsychological tests
Change from Baseline (T1) to immediately after the intervention period (T2) and 8 months after Baseline (T3)
Change in TBI related challenges in everyday life
Change from Baseline (T1) to immediately after the intervention period (T2) and 8 months after Baseline (T3)
Change in self reported mental health
Change from Baseline (T1) to immediately after the intervention period (T2) and 8 months after Baseline (T3)
Change in quality of life
Change from Baseline (T1) to immediately after the intervention period (T2) and 8 months after Baseline (T3)
Changes in community integration
Change from Baseline (T1) to immediately after the intervention period (T2) and 8 months after Baseline (T3)
Other Outcomes (2)
Changes in ABI related self-efficacy
Change from Baseline (T1) to immediately after the intervention period (T2) and 8 months after Baseline (T3)
Changes in WM self-efficacy
Change from Baseline (T1) to immediately after the intervention period (T2) and 8 months after Baseline (T3)
Study Arms (3)
Hypnotic suggestion
EXPERIMENTALDuring the first phase of the study, two groups will receive identical hypnotic inductions followed by targeted suggestion for one group and non-targeted suggestion for the other. The targeted procedure consists of suggestions about enhancing WM functions through the instantiation of preinjury WM ability in the present using age regression and visualizations of brain plasticity.
Mindfulness
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe targeted procedure consists of suggestions about enhancing WM functions through the instantiation of preinjury WM ability in the present using age regression and visualizations of brain plasticity.
No treatment
NO INTERVENTIONThe passive control group receives no intervention
Interventions
The intervention group will receive four weekly 60 min. sessions with hypnosis treatment including induction followed by hypnotic suggestion.
The active control group will receive four weekly 60 min. sessions of induction and mindfulness-based instructions.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- A documented non-progressive ABI, minimum 12 months post- injury and ongoing WM deficits by self-report and/or neuropsychological assessment
- The above mentioned patients have received multidisciplinary cognitive rehabilitation before participation
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with severe mental illness
- Patients progressive neurologic disease
- Patients with ongoing ICD-10 diagnosis of substance dependence
- Patients that lack Norwegian language skills
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospitallead
- University of Oslocollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital
Nesoddtangen, Akershus, 1453, Norway
Related Publications (1)
Eide LS, Rike PO, Reme SE, Snekkevik H, Rossner S, Rosen G, Lindelov JK, Lovstad M. Using hypnotic suggestion in the rehabilitation of working memory capacity after acquired brain injury: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2024 Jan 2;25(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07867-z.
PMID: 38167204DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marianne Løvstad, Profesor
Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital and University of Oslo
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- It is not possible to blind participants or therapists to group allocation during the intervention. Independent Outcome Assessor(s) will be blinded to group allocation. Participants will be provided with new IDs in final database, blinding researchers to which group is the interventions group, active control group or passive control group during analysis.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 9, 2022
First Posted
March 18, 2022
Study Start
August 15, 2022
Primary Completion
April 1, 2024
Study Completion
April 1, 2024
Last Updated
November 8, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-11