Facilitating Adaptive Expertise in Learning Computed Tomography
FAIL CT
The FAIL CT Study: Facilitating Adaptive Expertise in Learning Computed Tomography, a Multi-center Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
150
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The main objective of this study is to demonstrate that Error Management Training improves adaptive expertise in head computed tomography interpretation. The investigators will conduct a randomized controlled trial comparing two learning strategies, Error Management Training vs Error Avoidance Training, in emergency medicine residents. The investigators hypothesize that Error Management Training, as compared to Error Avoidance Training, will improve adaptive expertise, as measured by skills transfer, when used to teach head computed tomography interpretation to emergency medicine residents.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jul 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 10, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 17, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 18, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2023
CompletedApril 2, 2024
March 1, 2024
1 year
March 10, 2022
March 31, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percent correct on an assessment of transfer of skills (adaptive expertise)
Participants will have to demonstrate transfer of head computed tomography interpretation skills by interpreting novel radiology cases different from those used in the instructional session. Performance will be assessed by percent score on a head computed tomography interpretation test using novel radiology content not addressed in the instructional session. Score range is 0-100%.
Immediately after instructional session (up to 60 minutes to complete the assessment)
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Percent correct on an assessment of post-session proficiency for learning objectives (routine expertise)
Immediately after instructional session (up to 60 minutes to complete the assessment)
Effect of post-graduate year level on post-test performance
Immediately after instructional session (up to 60 minutes to complete the assessment)
Mediation effect of errors on performance on the adaptive expertise cases
Number of errors will be measured during the educational intervention
Study Arms (3)
Error Management Training (Difficult)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants receive the learning strategy Error Management Training and encounter difficult questions.
Error Management Training (Easy)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants receive the learning strategy Error Management Training and encounter easy questions.
Error Avoidance Training
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants receive the learning strategy Error Avoidance Training.
Interventions
Error Management Training is used to teach head computed tomography interpretation. Participants encounter difficult questions.
Error Management Training is used to teach head computed tomography interpretation. Participants encounter easy questions.
Error Avoidance Training used to teach head computed tomography interpretation.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Study participation will be available to all current emergency medicine residents at Stanford and at thirteen external sites.
You may not qualify if:
- Adults unable to consent
- Pregnant women
- Individuals who are not yet adults (infants, children, teenagers)
- Prisoners
- Medical students
- Residents from specialties other than emergency medicine
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Stanford Universitylead
- Brown Universitycollaborator
- Alameda Health Systemcollaborator
- University of California, Los Angelescollaborator
- University of Chicagocollaborator
- The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houstoncollaborator
- University of Wisconsin, Madisoncollaborator
- Vanderbilt Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Stanford University
Stanford, California, 94305, United States
Related Publications (16)
Aliaga L, Clarke SO. Rethinking Radiology: An Active Learning Curriculum for Head Computed Tomography Interpretation. West J Emerg Med. 2022 Jan 1;23(1):47-51. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2021.10.53665.
PMID: 35060860BACKGROUNDPusic MV, Santen SA, Dekhtyar M, Poncelet AN, Roberts NK, Wilson-Delfosse AL, Cutrer WB. Learning to balance efficiency and innovation for optimal adaptive expertise. Med Teach. 2018 Aug;40(8):820-827. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1485887. Epub 2018 Aug 9.
PMID: 30091659BACKGROUNDRoyce CS, Hayes MM, Schwartzstein RM. Teaching Critical Thinking: A Case for Instruction in Cognitive Biases to Reduce Diagnostic Errors and Improve Patient Safety. Acad Med. 2019 Feb;94(2):187-194. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002518.
PMID: 30398993BACKGROUNDKing A, Holder MG Jr, Ahmed RA. Errors as allies: error management training in health professions education. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Jun;22(6):516-9. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-000945. Epub 2013 Jan 3.
PMID: 23293120BACKGROUNDDyre L, Tabor A, Ringsted C, Tolsgaard MG. Imperfect practice makes perfect: error management training improves transfer of learning. Med Educ. 2017 Feb;51(2):196-206. doi: 10.1111/medu.13208. Epub 2016 Dec 12.
PMID: 27943372BACKGROUNDGardner AK, Abdelfattah K, Wiersch J, Ahmed RA, Willis RE. Embracing Errors in Simulation-Based Training: The Effect of Error Training on Retention and Transfer of Central Venous Catheter Skills. J Surg Educ. 2015 Nov-Dec;72(6):e158-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.08.002. Epub 2015 Sep 8.
PMID: 26362712BACKGROUNDMylopoulos M, Brydges R, Woods NN, Manzone J, Schwartz DL. Preparation for future learning: a missing competency in health professions education? Med Educ. 2016 Jan;50(1):115-23. doi: 10.1111/medu.12893.
PMID: 26695471BACKGROUNDKeith N, Frese M. Effectiveness of error management training: a meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol. 2008 Jan;93(1):59-69. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.59.
PMID: 18211135BACKGROUNDKeith N, Frese M. Self-regulation in error management training: emotion control and metacognition as mediators of performance effects. J Appl Psychol. 2005 Jul;90(4):677-91. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.677.
PMID: 16060786BACKGROUNDKua J, Lim WS, Teo W, Edwards RA. A scoping review of adaptive expertise in education. Med Teach. 2021 Mar;43(3):347-355. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1851020. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
PMID: 33251895BACKGROUNDEva KW. Diagnostic error in medical education: where wrongs can make rights. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2009 Sep;14 Suppl 1:71-81. doi: 10.1007/s10459-009-9188-9. Epub 2009 Aug 11.
PMID: 19669913BACKGROUNDSoderstrom NC, Bjork RA. Learning versus performance: an integrative review. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015 Mar;10(2):176-99. doi: 10.1177/1745691615569000.
PMID: 25910388BACKGROUNDMetcalfe J. Learning from Errors. Annu Rev Psychol. 2017 Jan 3;68:465-489. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044022. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
PMID: 27648988BACKGROUNDMylopoulos M, Kulasegaram K, Woods NN. Developing the experts we need: Fostering adaptive expertise through education. J Eval Clin Pract. 2018 Jun;24(3):674-677. doi: 10.1111/jep.12905. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
PMID: 29516651BACKGROUNDMylopoulos M, Steenhof N, Kaushal A, Woods NN. Twelve tips for designing curricula that support the development of adaptive expertise. Med Teach. 2018 Aug;40(8):850-854. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1484082. Epub 2018 Jul 15.
PMID: 30009648BACKGROUNDAliaga L, Bavolek RA, Cooper B, Mariorenzi A, Ahn J, Kraut A, Duong D, Burger C, Gisondi MA. Error Management Training and Adaptive Expertise in Learning Computed Tomography Interpretation: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2431600. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.31600.
PMID: 39250155DERIVED
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Leonardo Aliaga, MD
Stanford University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Instructor, Department of Emergency Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 10, 2022
First Posted
March 17, 2022
Study Start
July 18, 2022
Primary Completion
July 31, 2023
Study Completion
September 30, 2023
Last Updated
April 2, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
No current plan to share data.