A Prospective, Single Center, Single-Arm Clinical Study of 20 Participants to Reduce the Appearance of the Peri-orbital Wrinkles. Participants Will Receive up to Four Treatments With Tixel Every 4 Weeks. Follow-up Will Occur 1 Month and 3 Months Following Last Treatment.
A Prospective, Single-arm Clinical Study Evaluating the Safety and Effectiveness of the Tixel Fractional System in the Treatment of Periorbital Wrinkles
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A Prospective, Single center, Single-Arm Clinical Study of 13-20 study participants who are seeking a procedure to reduce the appearance of the peri-orbital wrinkles. Each study participant will receive up to four (4) treatments with the Tixel in a monthly interval. Follow-up will occur 1 month and 3 months following last treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 20, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 15, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 16, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 20, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 20, 2022
CompletedMarch 16, 2022
March 1, 2022
1 year
February 15, 2022
March 7, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Safety Adverse Events report
Evaluation of related adverse events up to the 3-month after last treatment visit
Up to 12 months
Effectiveness using Fitzpatrick Wrinkle Classification Scale (FWCS)
Comparison of the proportion of subjects with a ≥ 1-score improvement on the Fitzpatrick Wrinkle Classification Scale (FWCS) at the 3-month visit compared to baseline. The FWCS is a clinically validated assessment tool used to assess skin wrinkle severity and elastosis on a scale from 1 through 9, where the lower score is considered better.
Up to 12 months
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Effectiveness using Fitzpatrick Wrinkle Classification Scale (FWCS)- Unblinded
Up to 12 months
Effectiveness using GAIS-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale Assessment-Unblinded
Up to 12 months
Evaluation of the pain and discomfort
Up to 12 months
Subject Subjective Downtime Assessment
Up to 12 months
Patients' Reported Outcomes
Up to 12 months
Study Arms (1)
Tixel 2
EXPERIMENTALTixel 2 Treatment, 4 treatment sessions, followed by 2 Follow up sessions, 1 and 3 months after last treatment visit. Subject would be questioned about pain level, subjective downtime assessment and subjective response assessment. Images would be taken at the baseline and in Follow up visits.
Interventions
Thermo-mechanical technology for fractional treatment of human skin. Dermal heating and coagulative effect that occur during the treatment session provide dermal remodeling and collagen restructuring that promote wrinkles appearance improvement.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female 35-75 years old diagnosed with clinically evident fine (mild) to moderate depth periorbital wrinkles.
- Willingness and ability to comply with all required study activities including returning for follow-up visits and protocol requirements.
- The subject is able to provide written informed consent and perform the study's activities according to HIPAA guidelines.
- Fitzpatrick wrinkle score of 3-7 in the peri-orbital areas per the treating investigator.
- Stable body weight during the study period.
- Skin Type I - V as per Fitzpatrick Skin Scale
You may not qualify if:
- Past treatment with Tixel device.
- The subject may not undergo treatment by the Tixel device according to the device's contra-indications for use, as defined in the User Manual and in the Instructions for Use and by any other labeling of the device.
- Subjects who, in the investigator's opinion, have a history of poor cooperation, noncompliance with medical treatment, or unreliability.
- Female subjects who are pregnant, or planning to become pregnant, or have given birth less than 3 months ago or are lactating.
- Subjects with significant exposure to critical amounts of ultraviolet light (Suntan).
- Subjects who have had the following treatments:
- a cosmetic procedure to improve periorbital rhytides within 6 months.
- Injectable filler in temples and in the upper face area to be treated within 12 months of investigation.
- Any subject who have visible scars or other visible changes over the treated areas that may affect evaluation of response and/or quality of photography.
- Subjects with any type of active cut, wound, inflammation, lesion (benign, premalignant or malignant) or active bacterial, viral, fungal, or herpetic infection on the skin on the designated treatment sites or in close proximity to it.
- Existing or history of the following (when discussing skin conditions, refers only to the periorbital sites):
- skin malignancy, or any diagnosis of suspected malignancy
- Collagen or vascular or bleeding disease
- Immunosuppression or autoimmune disease
- History of persistent beyond 2 years post inflammatory hyperpigmentation.
- +13 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Physicians Laser & Dermatology Institute, LLC
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
Related Publications (10)
Park SE, Kim SS, Kim CW, Her Y. A Prospective Split-Face Comparative Study of Periorbital Wrinkle Treatments: Fractional Erbium-Doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet Laser, Intense Pulsed Light, and Topical 0.1% Tretinoin Cream. Ann Dermatol. 2016 Oct;28(5):650-652. doi: 10.5021/ad.2016.28.5.650. Epub 2016 Sep 30. No abstract available.
PMID: 27746652BACKGROUNDManriquez JJ, Majerson Gringberg D, Nicklas Diaz C. Wrinkles. BMJ Clin Evid. 2008 Dec 16;2008:1711.
PMID: 19445782BACKGROUNDGupta MA, Gupta AK. Photodamaged skin and quality of life; reasons for therapy. J Dermatol Treat 1996; 7:261-264
BACKGROUNDGanceviciene R, Liakou AI, Theodoridis A, Makrantonaki E, Zouboulis CC. Skin anti-aging strategies. Dermatoendocrinol. 2012 Jul 1;4(3):308-19. doi: 10.4161/derm.22804.
PMID: 23467476BACKGROUNDHruza G, Taub AF, Collier SL, Mulholland SR. Skin rejuvenation and wrinkle reduction using a fractional radiofrequency system. J Drugs Dermatol. 2009 Mar;8(3):259-65.
PMID: 19271373BACKGROUNDMulholland RS, Ahn DH, Kreindel M, Paul M. Fractional Ablative Radio-Frequency Resurfacing in Asian and Caucasian Skin: A Novel Method for Deep Radiofrequency Fractional Skin Rejuvenation. Journal of Cosmetics, Dermatological Sciences and Applications. 2012;2(3):144-150
BACKGROUNDMichaud T, Gassia V, Belhaouari L. Facial dynamics and emotional expressions in facial aging treatments. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2015 Mar;14(1):9-21. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12128. Epub 2015 Jan 24.
PMID: 25620090BACKGROUNDFitzpatrick RE, Goldman MP, Satur NM, Tope WD. Pulsed carbon dioxide laser resurfacing of photo-aged facial skin. Arch Dermatol. 1996 Apr;132(4):395-402.
PMID: 8629842BACKGROUNDGold AH, Pozner J, Weiss R. A Fractional Bipolar Radiofrequency Device Combined with a Bipolar Radiofrequency and Infrared Light Treatment for Improvement in Facial Wrinkles and Overall Skin Tone and Texture. Aesthet Surg J. 2016 Oct;36(9):1058-67. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjw086. Epub 2016 Jul 29.
PMID: 27474769BACKGROUNDKim JK, Roh MR, Park GH, Kim YJ, Jeon IK, Chang SE. Fractionated microneedle radiofrequency for the treatment of periorbital wrinkles. J Dermatol. 2013 Mar;40(3):172-6. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.12046. Epub 2012 Dec 17.
PMID: 23252484BACKGROUND
Related Links
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jerome Garden, M.D.
Physician Laser & Dermatology Institute
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- Blinded assessed of the improvement would be done between Last FU images and baseline, following randomization of the images.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 15, 2022
First Posted
March 16, 2022
Study Start
August 20, 2021
Primary Completion
August 20, 2022
Study Completion
August 20, 2022
Last Updated
March 16, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Undecided