Study Stopped
Delay in recruitment as per last protocol amendment due to Covid-19
A Safety and Effectiveness Study of the Tixel Device, (Fractional Peri-orbital Wrinkles Treatment ) Compared With Laser
A Prospective, Randomized, Double Arm, Controlled Study With Blinded Assessment to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the Tixel Fractional System in the Treatment of Periorbital Wrinkles in Comparison With Fractional Laser
1 other identifier
interventional
68
2 countries
2
Brief Summary
This study is designed to explore the safety and the effectiveness of the Tixel device. This device performs fractional treatment of the skin by applying thermal (heat) energy to the skin. The study shall compare the safety and the effectiveness of the Tixel with the safety and the effectiveness of a laser device which is currently cleared for marketing in the US.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 17, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 6, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 12, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 4, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 4, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 20, 2024
CompletedAugust 23, 2024
August 1, 2024
2.5 years
February 17, 2018
July 9, 2023
August 22, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mean Change by Blinded Assessor Evaluation by Fitzpatrick Classification of Facial Wrinkling (FWCS) Scale
The FWCS shall be assessed and quantified by 3 blinded assessors comparing baseline visit to +42 weeks visit.
baseline, 42 Weeks
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Mean Change of Subject Experience as Measured by Subject's Subjective Satisfaction Score
Treatment 1 (Baseline), Treatment 4 (Week 12), Treatment 5 (Week 16), Follow-up Visit 1 (Week 20), Follow-up Visit 3 (Week 42)
Number of Days Reported by Subject Using Subjective Subject Downtime Assessment
visit 1 - visit 5
Pain Level as Measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Scale
treatment 1 - treatment 5
Number on End-User Experience Scale
After performing 5 treatments with each device. After performing between 20 or 30 treatments with each device. After completing all the required treatments in the investigator's study site with both devices.
Mean Score Performance as Measured by the Fitzpatrick Classification of Facial Wrinkling (FWCS)
baseline, 42 Weeks
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Tixel
EXPERIMENTALTixel Treatment.
Laser
ACTIVE COMPARATORLaser Treatment.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female 40-70 years old diagnosed with clinically evident fine (mild) to moderate depth periorbital wrinkling
- Willingness and ability to comply with all required study activities and protocol requirements.
- The subject is able to provide written informed consent and perform the study's activities according to HIPAA guidelines and/or Israeli law, depending on each specific study site.
- \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
You may not qualify if:
- The subject may not undergo treatment by the Tixel or comparator device according to the device's contra-indications for use, as defined in the User Manual and in the Instructions for Use and by any other labeling of the device.
- Female subjects who are pregnant, or planning to become pregnant, or have given birth less than 3 months ago or are lactating.
- Subjects with significant exposure to critical amounts of ultraviolet light (Sun tan).
- Subjects who have had the following treatments:
- a prior cosmetic procedure to improve facial rhytides (i.e., rhytidectomy, periorbital or eyelid/eyebrow surgery, brow lift, CO2/Erbium/similar laser/fractional resurfacing, radiofrequency treatment) within 12 months
- prior facial treatments with laser, surgical, chemical or light based facial treatments within the previous 6 months, such as for botulinum toxin injections, retinoid, microdermabrasion or prescription level glycolic acid treatments
- Injectable filler in area to be treated within 9 months of investigation.
- permanent facial implant
- Any subject who have visible scars that may affect evaluation of response and/or quality of photography.
- Subjects with any type of active cut, wound, inflammation, lesion (benign, premalignant or malignant) or active bacterial, viral, fungal, or herpetic infection on the skin on the designated treatment sites or in close proximity to it.
- Existing or history of the following (when discussing skin conditions, refers only to the periorbital sites):
- skin malignancy, or any diagnosis of suspected malignancy
- Collagen or vascular or bleeding disease
- Immunosuppression or autoimmune disease
- Erythema with or without blistering
- +14 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Novoxel Ltd.lead
Study Sites (2)
New York Laser & Skin Care
New York, New York, 10028, United States
Dr. Artzi Skin Center Clinic - Linked to Hillel Yaffe Medical Center
Tel Aviv, 6937947, Israel
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Ifat Klein
- Organization
- Novoxel Ltd
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Arielle NB Kauvar, M.D
New York Laser & Skin Care Clinic
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Sharon Naim, B.Sc,
Novoxel Ltd.
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rafi Carasso, M.D
Hillel Yaffe Medical Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The assessor shall be blinded to the type of intervention when assessing the outcome of the treatment.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 17, 2018
First Posted
March 6, 2018
Study Start
March 12, 2018
Primary Completion
September 4, 2020
Study Completion
September 4, 2020
Last Updated
August 23, 2024
Results First Posted
June 20, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share