Comparison of the Effect of Subcutaneous Progesterone and Vaginal Progesterone for Luteal Phase Support
1 other identifier
interventional
146
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The invesigators aimed to seperate the patients,which is going to be applied IUI, to two different groups as prospective randomized controlled ;assess the efficacy of the two different way pressurised progesterone by appling intravaginal progesterone to the first group; subcutaneous to the second group.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 3, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 11, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2022
CompletedSeptember 9, 2022
September 1, 2022
2 months
March 3, 2022
September 8, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
clinical pregnancy rate
after iui betahcg levels blood sampling
day 15
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Ongoing pregnancy rate
Months 3
Study Arms (2)
subcutaneous progesterone
EXPERIMENTALPROLUTEX® 25 mg Solution for injection, IBSA Group, Lugano, Switzerland
vaginal progesterone
ACTIVE COMPARATORLUTINUS® 100 mg vaginal tablets, Ferring GmbH Wittland/Kiel/Germany
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Absence of follicles larger than 10 mm on basal ultrasound
- Endometrial thickness less than 5 mm
- Patients with FSH\<10 IU/ml, E2\<60-80 pg/ml in the blood hormone test performed on the third day of the cycle and patients with antral follicle count above 7 on ultrasound
- Total motile sperm count greater than 10 million/ml
- years old female, 18-50 years old male
- Anovulation, patients diagnosed with unexplained mild male factor infertility
- Female partners, who's BMI\<25 kg/m²
- Being voluntarily
You may not qualify if:
- Other infertility reasons
- The patients who doesn't meet the criterias
- Refusing to attend to the research
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Bezmialem Vakif University
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (7)
Erdem A, Erdem M, Atmaca S, Guler I. Impact of luteal phase support on pregnancy rates in intrauterine insemination cycles: a prospective randomized study. Fertil Steril. 2009 Jun;91(6):2508-13. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.04.029. Epub 2008 Aug 9.
PMID: 18692788BACKGROUNDOktem M, Altinkaya SO, Yilmaz SA, Bozkurt N, Erdem M, Erdem A, Gumuslu S. Effect of luteal phase support after ovulation induction and intrauterine insemination. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2014;30(12):909-12. doi: 10.3109/09513590.2014.947567. Epub 2014 Aug 7.
PMID: 25102275BACKGROUNDMaher MA. Luteal phase support may improve pregnancy outcomes during intrauterine insemination cycles. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Jul;157(1):57-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.03.022. Epub 2011 Apr 21.
PMID: 21514032BACKGROUNDOzcan P, Takmaz T. Identification of predictive factors for the probability of pregnancy following ovulation stimulation-intra-uterine insemination cycles in terms of female and male. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2021 Mar;47(3):893-899. doi: 10.1111/jog.14594. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
PMID: 33403758BACKGROUNDKeskin M, Aytac R. Does Luteal Phase Support Effect Pregnancy Rates in Intrauterine Insemination Cycles? A Prospective Randomised Controlled Study in a Tertiary Center. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2020 Aug 5;2020:6234070. doi: 10.1155/2020/6234070. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 32831851BACKGROUNDKhosravi D, Taheripanah R, Taheripanah A, Tarighat Monfared V, Hosseini-Zijoud SM. Comparison of oral dydrogesterone with vaginal progesteronefor luteal support in IUI cycles: a randomized clinical trial. Iran J Reprod Med. 2015 Jul;13(7):433-8.
PMID: 26494991BACKGROUNDGreen KA, Zolton JR, Schermerhorn SM, Lewis TD, Healy MW, Terry N, DeCherney AH, Hill MJ. Progesterone luteal support after ovulation induction and intrauterine insemination: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2017 Apr;107(4):924-933.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.01.011. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
PMID: 28238492BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Gurkan Kiran, MD
Bezmialem Vakif University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 3, 2022
First Posted
March 11, 2022
Study Start
April 1, 2022
Primary Completion
June 1, 2022
Study Completion
September 1, 2022
Last Updated
September 9, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share