NCT03767192

Brief Summary

The primary objective of the study is to assess the safety and effectiveness of SPG stimulation with the ISS in patients with an acute ischemic stroke in the anterior circulation initiated within 24 hours from stroke onset.

Trial Health

60
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
327

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2009

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
3 countries

8 active sites

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2009

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2011

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2012

Completed
6.8 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 5, 2018

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 6, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

January 28, 2019

Status Verified

December 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

December 5, 2018

Last Update Submit

January 25, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

acute ischemic strokerandomized clinical trialeffectivenesssafety

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Sliding Dichotomy modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 months

    Final global disability level on the modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 3 months better than expectation (sliding dichotomy analysis) ) assessed in the modified intention to treat (mITT) population defined as all randomized subjects receiving at least the minimal exposure of 1 treatment (ISS Stimulation or Sham Control) session out of the 5 planned sessions. mRS Scale: * 0 - No symptoms. * 1 - No significant disability. Able to carry out all usual activities, despite some symptoms. * 2 - Slight disability. Able to look after own affairs without assistance, but unable to carry out all previous activities. * 3 - Moderate disability. Requires some help, but able to walk unassisted. * 4 - Moderately severe disability. Unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance, and unable to walk unassisted. * 5 - Severe disability. Requires constant nursing care and attention, bedridden, incontinent. * 6 - Dead.

    90 ±7 days

  • Number of participants with Serious Adverse Events

    Comparison between the active and sham stimulation groups of all serious adverse events (SAEs)

    90 ±7 days

  • Number of participants with neurological deterioration

    Comparison between the active and sham stimulation groups of the rate of neurological deterioration, defined as an increase of 4 or more points on the NIHSS related to any neurological event within the first 10 days after stroke onset

    10 days

  • Number of participants with implantation complications

    The rate of implantation complications as classified by the investigator

    90 ±7 days

  • Number of participants with stimulation-related adverse events

    Comparison between the active and sham stimulation groups of stimulation-related adverse events as classified by the investigator

    90 ±7 days

  • Mortality rate

    Comparison of mortality rates between the active and sham stimulation groups

    90 ±7 days

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Sliding Dichotomous 90-day mRS for patients with Aphasia at baseline

    90 ±7 days

  • Binary NIHSS at Day 90

    90 ±7 days

  • Stroke-related quality of life at 3 months: Stroke Impact Scale-16

    90 ±7 days

Study Arms (2)

Active Stimulation

EXPERIMENTAL

Device: The Ischemic Stroke System SPG stimulation and standard of care

Device: Active Stimulation

Sham Stimulation

SHAM COMPARATOR

Device: Sham control Sham stimulation and standard of care

Device: Sham Stimulation

Interventions

SPG stimulation and standard of care

Active Stimulation

Sham SPG stimulation and standard of care

Sham Stimulation

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 85 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age: ≥ 18 years and ≤ 85 of both genders.
  • Clinical diagnosis of an acute ischemic stroke in the Carotid, Middle or Anterior Cerebral Artery territories
  • Baseline NIHSS ≥ 7 and ≤ 18
  • Ability to initiate treatment within 8- 24 hours from stroke onset.

You may not qualify if:

  • Intracranial hemorrhage or hemorrhagic transformation
  • Massive stroke
  • Acute ischemic stroke in the posterior circulation
  • Minor stroke
  • Treated with IV-tPA ,IA-tPA or neurothrombectomy devices for the current stroke
  • Previous stroke in the last 6 months or pre-existing disability
  • Patients with bleeding propensity or any condition in the oral cavity that prevents implantation
  • Known cerebral arteriovenous malformation, cerebral aneurysm.
  • Clinical suspicion of septic embolus.
  • Uncontrolled hypertension (systolic \>185 mmHg and/or diastolic \>110 mmHg)
  • Serious systemic infection.
  • Women known to be pregnant or having a positive or indeterminate pregnancy test.
  • Patients with other implanted neural stimulator/ electronic devices (pacemakers).
  • Life expectancy \< 1 year from causes other than stroke.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (8)

Erlanger Stroke Center

Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37404, United States

Location

Erlangen University Clinic

Erlangen, Germany

Location

Essen University Clinic

Essen, Germany

Location

Heidelberg University Clinic

Heidelberg, Germany

Location

Leipzig University Clinic

Leipzig, Germany

Location

Munster University Clinic

Münster, Germany

Location

Hospital Vall d'Hebron

Barcelona, Spain

Location

Hospital Universitari de Girona

Girona, Spain

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Bornstein NM, Saver JL, Diener HC, Gorelick PB, Shuaib A, Solberg Y, Devlin T, Leung T, Molina CA; ImpACT-24A Investigators. Sphenopalatine Ganglion Stimulation to Augment Cerebral Blood Flow: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial. Stroke. 2019 Aug;50(8):2108-2117. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.024582. Epub 2019 May 23.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Ischemic Stroke

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

StrokeCerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • Eyal Shay

    BrainsGate

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 5, 2018

First Posted

December 6, 2018

Study Start

January 1, 2009

Primary Completion

January 1, 2011

Study Completion

March 1, 2012

Last Updated

January 28, 2019

Record last verified: 2018-12

Locations