A Nurse-led Health Coaching Intervention for Heart Failure Self-care Management
The Implementation and Initial Impact of a Nurse-led Health Coaching Intervention for Heart Failure Self-care Management
1 other identifier
interventional
20
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
There is an increase in Heart Failure (HF) hospitalizations and readmissions despite medical advances (Desai \& Stevenson, 2012; Ambrosy et al.,2014) and in spite of the education provided to HF patients regarding the signs of fluid accumulation, HF exacerbations persist. Unfortunately, there seems to be a gap between patients recognizing these signs of fluid accumulation and performing timely self-management activities to control it. Currently, there is no standardized approach for the delivery of a nurse-led health coaching intervention to assist patients to engage in HF symptom management with self-care activities within a Primary Health Care (PHC) setting. To address this gap, the aim of this research is to examine the feasibility, acceptability, and initial effectiveness of a nurse-led health coaching intervention, involving a self-care activity of the Adjusted Diuretic Dosing (ADD) tool with stable HF patients and their significant others a PHC approach and within a PHC setting. In the proposed study, nurses will engage with health coaching and a health coaching tool (developed in Phase 1 of this research with the assistance of nurses working in this area) to assist the patient to identify barriers to self-care and develop the patient's goals to successfully engage in HF self-care strategies. It is also necessary for the nurse to capture through documentation what decision-making strategies the nurse performed to assist the patient with HF management. It is through these decision-making points, identified strategies can be examined by the researcher to determine what care gaps or process has occurred. Also, It is through the awareness of the patient's knowledge, skills, past experience, and values and beliefs, those daily decisions will be made by the patient, e.g., decisions will be influenced by the interactions among the person, the problem, and setting or environment - they are situation-specific (Riegel et al., 2016). It is expected that through this kind of naturalistic decision-making process the patient's self-confidence will increase to take action towards maintaining HF self-care activities (such as medication and diet adherence, and weight monitoring), respond to the perception of HF symptoms (seeking medical attention), and be supported to manage their HF condition (adjusting diuretics in response to fluid retention); this to support improved health outcomes and quality of life.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable heart-failure
Started Apr 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable heart-failure
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 26, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 8, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2022
CompletedMarch 25, 2022
January 1, 2022
3 months
January 26, 2022
March 9, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Quality of Life Scale on the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ)
The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) is a 21-item paper self- administered questionnaire designed as a measure of heart failure, as indicated by its adverse effects on patients' lives. The MLHFQ quantifies a single overall score as a measure of the impact of heart failure on the patient's life. Higher scores indicate worse physical and emotional quality of life. Physical 0-40 Emotional 0-25
Baseline
Patient Self Confidence on the Self-Care Heart Failure Index (SCHFI)
Patient Self-Confidence on the Self-Care Heart Failure Index (SCHFI) measures self-care with three scales: self-care maintenance, measuring behaviors to maintain HF stability; symptom perception, measuring monitoring behaviors; and self-care management, assessing the response to symptoms.Physical 0-40 Emotional 0-25 Scores 0-100.
Baseline
Caregiver Self Confidence on the Caregiver Contribution for Self-Care Heart Failure Index (CC-SCHFI)
The Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (CC-SCHFI) measures these contributions across three scales: self-care maintenance (symptom monitoring and treatment adherence); self-care management (dealing with symptoms); and confidence in contributing to the self-care (self-efficacy in managing self-care). Higher scores indicating greater caregiver contributions to heart failure self-care. Scores 0-100.
Baseline
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Changes in the Quality of Life Scale on the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ)
6 months
Changes in Patient Self Confidence on the Self-Care Heart Failure Index (SCHFI)
6 months
Changes in Caregiver Self Confidence on the Caregiver Contribution for Self-Care Heart Failure Index (CC-SCHFI)
6 months
Study Arms (1)
Health-coaching Intervention
EXPERIMENTALA nurse-lead health coaching intervention to support heart failure self-care management is employed by the nurses. This is a pre-post single group design - there is only one arm.
Interventions
A focus group meeting will be arranged with the nurse participants to provide training on the study intervention specific to the Nurse-led health coaching intervention. The intervention involves identifying barriers and finding strategies and solutions to self-care management, while employing a self-care HF management tool of adjusting diuretic dosing (ADD) according to the congestive cardiac calendar (designed in collaboration with nurses in Phase 1). It will be essential for the nurses to document key information pertaining to the rationale for these decision-making strategies or solutions. This is in comparison to the standard of care in primary health care of nurses not taking a standardize approach towards health coaching and the patient being instructed by the practitioner to take a set diuretic dosing (SDD).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult HF patients (age 18 years or older) with a documented diagnosis of HF on the medical record who are stable with no acute signs of HF decompensation and on a stable dose of diuretics for a minimum of three months.
- Patients registered within the Family Medical Clinics in London who have a caregiver or support defined by a person who provides either direct HF support (medication or meal preparation) or indirect HF support (providing emotional support, transportation, or assisting with decision-making around symptom perception or management).
- Patient and caregiver dyads who have a willingness and ability to participate in an interview and complete surveys; and
- English speaking.
- Registered nurses, including Nurse Practitioners employed at the Family Medical Clinics in London who participate in the care of patients living with HF.
You may not qualify if:
- A person with cognitive impairment that would interfere with their ability to provide informed consent.
- A person with any medical condition that has an expected survival of less than 6 months: End-stage renal disease, end-stage liver disease, end stage Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), end-stage/terminal cancer.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Victoria Smye, PhD
Western University
Central Study Contacts
Maureen Leyser, MN
CONTACT
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 26, 2022
First Posted
March 8, 2022
Study Start
April 1, 2022
Primary Completion
July 1, 2022
Study Completion
July 1, 2022
Last Updated
March 25, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-01