Effectiveness of Basketball Pre-injury Attack Program to Reduce the Susceptibility of Injury in Youth Basketball Players

NCT05256186 | Completed

• 1 other identifier: 123/2018 (phase 2)
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 212
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

Basketball is an impact, coordination-opposition sport with continuous contact among players and it is considered a sport of medium-high injury incidence. Players are force to have a physical condition appropriate to their practice and the demand to which they must respond due to the intensity of the efforts this sport requires. In order to achieve this, it is necessary to establish an evaluation protocol that allows the detection of functional deficiencies, to guide and conduct in a specific and early way every moment of players' health and growth. The purpose of this study is to design, apply and analyze the effectiveness of a specific and individualized therapeutic exercise program (Basketball Pre-injury Attack) based on the approach of the functional deficiencies detected by the Basketball Injury Defense, to reduce the susceptibility to injury of youth basketball players (U14 - U17).

Conditions

Injury;Sports; Biomechanical Lesions; Musculoskeletal Injury; Sports Physical Therapy

Keywords

Basketball; Prevention

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (8)

• Ankle dorsiflexion under load

  The Weight-bearing Lunge Test measured with the Leg Motion® system (Check Your Motion, Albacete) was used. Ankle dorsiflexion was recorded in centimeters.

  1 year

• Active hip, knee and ankle dorsiflexion

  The Hurdle Step Test measured with the Leg Motion® system (Check Your Motion, Albacete) was used. A frontal and sagittal view was recorded with two filming devices so that the results could be analyzed later. Impairment was considered in those cases in which the subject was not able to step the foot over the rope during the hurdle step or if he/she performed adduction, internal or external rotation of the hip, and lost alignment between the hip, knee and ankle.

  1 year

• Ankle stability in monopodal loading

  The Single Leg Squat Test was used and the criteria established by Perrot were used: it was considered stable if the foot remained in neutral position during the movement; and unstable if excessive pronation of the foot was evident during the movement or external rotation of the leg. To analyze the results, a frontal and sagittal view was recorded with two filming devices.

  1 year

• Monopodal dynamic knee valgus

  The Single Leg Squat Test was used. The evaluator recorded a frontal and sagittal view with two filming devices. The knee was considered to be aligned if the patella was over the second toe.

  1 year

• Lumbo-pelvic stability

  It was evaluated qualitatively with the Single Leg Squat Test and the Hurdle Step Test. To analyze the results, a frontal and sagittal view was recorded with two filming devices and the criteria established by Perrot were used. It was considered stable if there was minimal movement in all three planes, the pelvic girdle was aligned and there was no evidence of excessive anteroposterior tilt and/or trunk rotation. It was considered unstable if these criteria were not met.

  1 year

• Dynamic postural stability

  It was analyzed qualitatively with the Single Leg Squat Test. The test was recorded with two filming devices (frontal and sagittal) and the criteria established by Perrot and Crossley were used. For this purpose, the deviation of the trunk with respect to the center of gravity was observed. It was considered stable if there was minimal translation of the center of mass, i.e., no lateral flexion/tilt, rotation or trunk flexion/extension.

  1 year

• Jumping/landing technique

  It was analyzed with de Single Hop for distance Test. Ankle stability at landing, dynamic knee valgus, lumbopelvic stability and dynamic postural stability were analyzed.

  1 year

• Symmetry between the dominant and non-dominant limb

  From the distance obtained in the Single Hop for distance Test, the Symmetry Index was calculated using the formula: (Distance dominant limb/Distance non-dominant limb)\*100.

  1 year

Secondary Outcomes (7)

• Age

  1 year

• Category

  1 year

• Gender

  1 year

• Weight

  1 year

• Height

  1 year

Study Arms (2)

Basketball pre-injury attack program

EXPERIMENTAL

The intervention group carried out a program for 24 weeks. The participant had to perform the program 3 days per week for 12-15' each day (training days with the team, prior to group activation).

Other: Basketball Pre-injury Attack program

Control

NO INTERVENTION

The control group performed only the initial, follow-up (12 weeks) and final (24 weeks) evaluations.

Interventions

Basketball Pre-injury Attack program OTHER

The intervention had a total duration of 24 weeks, with 3 sessions per week (before starting training) with a total duration of 12 to 15 minutes per session. Each session consisted of 8 exercises with a load of 2 to 3 series between 6 and 12 repetitions; and with a rest at the end of each series of \<60 seconds.

Basketball pre-injury attack program

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 14 Years - 17 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Child (0-17)

You may qualify if:

• Be between 10 and 17 years old
• Be an active player at the time of selection
• Sign the informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

• Being diagnosed with a psychological and/or psychiatric illness.
• Being diagnosed with an oncological disease.
• Be injured at the time of selection.

Sponsors & Collaborators

• University Rovira i Virgili: lead

Study Sites (1)

Federación Catalana de Baloncesto

Barcelona, 08018, Spain

Location

Related Publications (15)

• Romero Morales C, Calvo Lobo C, Rodriguez Sanz D, Sanz Corbalan I, Ruiz Ruiz B, Lopez Lopez D. The concurrent validity and reliability of the Leg Motion system for measuring ankle dorsiflexion range of motion in older adults. PeerJ. 2017 Jan 3;5:e2820. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2820. eCollection 2017.

  PMID: 28070457 BACKGROUND

• Aerts I, Cumps E, Verhagen E, Wuyts B, Van De Gucht S, Meeusen R. The effect of a 3-month prevention program on the jump-landing technique in basketball: a randomized controlled trial. J Sport Rehabil. 2015 Feb;24(1):21-30. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2013-0099. Epub 2014 Jun 6.

  PMID: 24911356 BACKGROUND

• Myer GD, Ford KR, McLean SG, Hewett TE. The effects of plyometric versus dynamic stabilization and balance training on lower extremity biomechanics. Am J Sports Med. 2006 Mar;34(3):445-55. doi: 10.1177/0363546505281241. Epub 2005 Nov 10.

  PMID: 16282579 BACKGROUND

• Myklebust G, Engebretsen L, Braekken IH, Skjolberg A, Olsen OE, Bahr R. Prevention of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in female team handball players: a prospective intervention study over three seasons. Clin J Sport Med. 2003 Mar;13(2):71-8. doi: 10.1097/00042752-200303000-00002.

  PMID: 12629423 BACKGROUND

• Moody JA, Naclerio F, Green P, Lloyd RS. Motor skill development in youths. En: Lloyd R, Oliver JL. Strength and Conditioning for Young Athletes: Science and Application. 1ª edición. New York:Routledge;2014

  BACKGROUND

• Dill KE, Begalle RL, Frank BS, Zinder SM, Padua DA. Altered knee and ankle kinematics during squatting in those with limited weight-bearing-lunge ankle-dorsiflexion range of motion. J Athl Train. 2014 Nov-Dec;49(6):723-32. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.29.

  PMID: 25144599 BACKGROUND

• Baumbach SF, Braunstein M, Seeliger F, Borgmann L, Bocker W, Polzer H. Ankle dorsiflexion: what is normal? Development of a decision pathway for diagnosing impaired ankle dorsiflexion and M. gastrocnemius tightness. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016 Sep;136(9):1203-1211. doi: 10.1007/s00402-016-2513-x. Epub 2016 Jul 14.

  PMID: 27418341 BACKGROUND

• Gonzalo-Skok O, Serna J, Rhea MR, Marin PJ. AGE DIFFERENCES IN MEASURES OF FUNCTIONAL MOVEMENT AND PERFORMANCE IN HIGHLY YOUTH BASKETBALL PLAYERS. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2017 Oct;12(5):812-821.

  PMID: 29181258 BACKGROUND

• Branta C, Haubenstricker J, Seefeldt V. Age changes in motor skills during childhood and adolescence. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 1984;12:467-520.

  PMID: 6734680 BACKGROUND

• Fort-Vanmeerhaeghe A, Gual G, Romero-Rodriguez D, Unnitha V. Lower Limb Neuromuscular Asymmetry in Volleyball and Basketball Players. J Hum Kinet. 2016 Apr 13;50:135-143. doi: 10.1515/hukin-2015-0150. eCollection 2016 Apr 1.

  PMID: 28149351 BACKGROUND

• Doherty C, Delahunt E, Caulfield B, Hertel J, Ryan J, Bleakley C. The incidence and prevalence of ankle sprain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective epidemiological studies. Sports Med. 2014 Jan;44(1):123-40. doi: 10.1007/s40279-013-0102-5.

  PMID: 24105612 BACKGROUND

• McKeon PO, Hertel J. Systematic review of postural control and lateral ankle instability, part I: can deficits be detected with instrumented testing. J Athl Train. 2008 May-Jun;43(3):293-304. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-43.3.293.

  PMID: 18523566 BACKGROUND

• Perrott MA, Pizzari T, Opar M, Cook J. Development of clinical rating criteria for tests of lumbopelvic stability. Rehabil Res Pract. 2012;2012:803637. doi: 10.1155/2012/803637. Epub 2011 Dec 29.

  PMID: 22263111 BACKGROUND

• Teyhen D, Bergeron MF, Deuster P, Baumgartner N, Beutler AI, de la Motte SJ, Jones BH, Lisman P, Padua DA, Pendergrass TL, Pyne SW, Schoomaker E, Sell TC, O'Connor F. Consortium for health and military performance and American College of Sports Medicine Summit: utility of functional movement assessment in identifying musculoskeletal injury risk. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2014 Jan-Feb;13(1):52-63. doi: 10.1249/JSR.0000000000000023.

  PMID: 24412892 BACKGROUND

• Hewett TE, Myer GD, Ford KR, Heidt RS Jr, Colosimo AJ, McLean SG, van den Bogert AJ, Paterno MV, Succop P. Biomechanical measures of neuromuscular control and valgus loading of the knee predict anterior cruciate ligament injury risk in female athletes: a prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 2005 Apr;33(4):492-501. doi: 10.1177/0363546504269591. Epub 2005 Feb 8.

  PMID: 15722287 BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Athletic Injuries

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Wounds and Injuries

Study Officials

• Cristina Adillón, MsC

  University Rovira i Virgili

  PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: SINGLE
• Who Masked: INVESTIGATOR
• Masking Details: The study was blinded to the investigators who performed both recruitment and assessments. In this way, detection bias could be controlled. It was not possible to perform a double-blind study, since it was a physical intervention and the player knew that he/she was undergoing an intervention program.
• Purpose: TREATMENT
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Associate Professor

Model Details: Randomized controlled trial

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: February 15, 2022
• First Posted: February 25, 2022
• Study Start: June 1, 2019
• Primary Completion: February 28, 2020
• Study Completion: June 30, 2020
• Last Updated: February 25, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-02

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will not share

Locations

ES (1)