Pronase Granules in Gastric Cleaning
The Efficiency of Pronase Granules in Gastric Cleaning of Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Study
1 other identifier
interventional
290
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (MCE) is now widely used all over the world. However, the standard gastric preparation method by dimethicone we used clinically still has mucus at the bottom of the stomach. In this study, we aimed to determine whether pronase granules is helpful to improve the cleanliness of gastric mucosa in MCE.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Feb 2021
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 24, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 9, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 20, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 22, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2022
CompletedFebruary 22, 2022
February 1, 2021
12 months
February 9, 2022
February 21, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Gastric Cleanliness Score (GCS)
Six primary anatomical landmarks of the stomach (cardia, fundus, body, angulus, antrum, and pylorus) were recorded for evaluation. A 4-point grading scale was introduced to define the cleanliness as excellent (no adherent mucus and foam: score 4), good (mild mucus and foam but do not obscure vision: score 3), fair (considerable amount of mucus or foam present precluding a completely reliable examination: score 2) and poor (large amount of mucus or foam residue needing water to clear it: score 1). GCS was the total scores of all six landmarks, ranging from 6 (completely unprepared) to 24 (perfect). GCS of≥18 was regarded as acceptable.
2 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Visualization of the small bowel Visualization of the small bowel Visualization of the small bowel Visualization of the small bowel Visualization of the small bowel
2 weeks
Fullness score
2 weeks
Gastric Examination Time (GET)
2 weeks
Esophageal transit time (ETT)
2 weeks
Gastric transit time (GTT)
2 weeks
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Control group
PLACEBO COMPARATORAll patients underwent a bowel preparation that consisted of a low-residue diet for 24 hours, fluid intake, and ingestion of two liters of polyethylene glycol-based electrolyte solution 12 hours before the examination. On the examination day, patients arrived at the hospital in the morning after an overnight fast (\>8hours). Then they would be randomly assigned to the control group or pronase group randomly. 40 minutes before capsule ingestion, all patients swallowed 100ml clear water containing 50mg dimethicone. And 25 minutes before swallowing the capsule, the patient was asked to take 200ml warm water. There is still have 800-1000ml water for gastric filling 10 minutes before swallowing the capsule.
Pronase group
EXPERIMENTALAll patients underwent a bowel preparation that consisted of a low-residue diet for 24 hours, fluid intake, and ingestion of two liters of polyethylene glycol-based electrolyte solution 12 hours before the examination. On the examination day, patients arrived at the hospital in the morning after an overnight fast (\>8hours). Then they would be randomly assigned to the control group or pronase group randomly. 40 minutes before capsule ingestion, all patients swallowed 100ml clear water containing 50mg dimethicone. And 25 minutes before swallowing the capsule, the patient was asked to take 20000 IU pronase Granules Combined with 1 g NaHCO3 dissolved in 200ml warm water to maintain the intragastric pH at 6 - 8. There is still have 800-1000ml water for gastric filling 10 minutes before swallowing the capsule.
Interventions
Drink Deyo with 200ml warm water 25 minutes before swallowing the capsule to remove mucus in the stomach.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 18 years old.
- Those who underwent upper gastrointestinal and small intestinal mucosal examination under magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy at Shanghai Changhai Hospital and Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital after January 2020.
- Able to provide informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- dysphagia or symptoms of gastric outlet obstruction, suspected or known intestinal stenosis, overt gastrointestinal bleeding, history of upper gastrointestinal surgery or abdominal surgery altering gastrointestinal anatomy, or post-abdominal radiation;
- congestive heart failure, renal insufficiency, use of anticoagulant medication,
- implanted metallic devices such as pacemakers, defibrillators, artificial heart valves or joint prostheses (although the low magnetic field used technically should not interfere with such devices);
- pregnancy;
- currently participating in another clinical study.
- Patients who fail to follow the prescribed procedures for magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy;
- Patients who only undergo gastric examination under magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy;
- Patients who only undergo small bowel examination under magnetic control capsule endoscopy;
- The patient's basic information in the database is incomplete#
- Patient fail to be followed up.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Changhai Hospital
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
Related Publications (6)
Zhu SG, Qian YY, Tang XY, Zhu QQ, Zhou W, Du H, An W, Su XJ, Zhao AJ, Ching HL, McAlindon ME, Li ZS, Liao Z. Gastric preparation for magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy: A prospective, randomized single-blinded controlled trial. Dig Liver Dis. 2018 Jan;50(1):42-47. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2017.09.129. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
PMID: 29110963RESULTLiao Z, Hou X, Lin-Hu EQ, Sheng JQ, Ge ZZ, Jiang B, Hou XH, Liu JY, Li Z, Huang QY, Zhao XJ, Li N, Gao YJ, Zhang Y, Zhou JQ, Wang XY, Liu J, Xie XP, Yang CM, Liu HL, Sun XT, Zou WB, Li ZS. Accuracy of Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy, Compared With Conventional Gastroscopy, in Detection of Gastric Diseases. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Sep;14(9):1266-1273.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.05.013. Epub 2016 May 20.
PMID: 27211503RESULTKrijbolder MS, Grooteman KV, Bogers SK, de Jong DJ. Addition of simethicone improves small bowel capsule endoscopy visualisation quality. Neth J Med. 2018 Jan;76(1):27-31.
PMID: 29380729RESULTCave DR, Hakimian S, Patel K. Current Controversies Concerning Capsule Endoscopy. Dig Dis Sci. 2019 Nov;64(11):3040-3047. doi: 10.1007/s10620-019-05791-4.
PMID: 31468267RESULTShamsudhin N, Zverev VI, Keller H, Pane S, Egolf PW, Nelson BJ, Tishin AM. Magnetically guided capsule endoscopy. Med Phys. 2017 Aug;44(8):e91-e111. doi: 10.1002/mp.12299. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
PMID: 28437000RESULTJiang X, Pan J, Li ZS, Liao Z. Standardized examination procedure of magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy. VideoGIE. 2019 May 30;4(6):239-243. doi: 10.1016/j.vgie.2019.03.003. eCollection 2019 Jun. No abstract available.
PMID: 31194028RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 9, 2022
First Posted
February 22, 2022
Study Start
February 24, 2021
Primary Completion
February 20, 2022
Study Completion
March 1, 2022
Last Updated
February 22, 2022
Record last verified: 2021-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share