NCT04203264

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate the performance of real-time auxiliary system based on artificial intelligence algorithm in lesion detection and quality control in magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2019

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 16, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 16, 2019

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 18, 2019

Completed
14 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

December 18, 2019

Status Verified

December 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

16 days

First QC Date

December 16, 2019

Last Update Submit

December 16, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

artificial intelligencemagnetically controlled capsule endoscopy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Sensitivity

    The sensitivity of lesions detected by system

    up to 2 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Delay time

    up to 2 weeks

  • Specificity

    up to 2 weeks

  • Accuracy of anatomic landmarks identification

    up to 2 weeks

  • Completeness of real-time observation with assistance

    up to 2 weeks

  • Accuracy of heat map

    up to 2 weeks

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Interventions

The patients swallowed the MCE with a small amount of water in the left lateral decubitus position. Once the capsule reached the stomach after investigating the esophagus, it was lifted away from the posterior wall, rotated and advanced to the fundus and cardiac regions, and then to the gastric body, angulus, antrum and pylorus. The magnetic steering time for passing through the pylorus was not allowed more than 15 min. The real-time auxiliary system implemented real-time processing for the output image of MCE system. Professional operators guarantee the integrity of the examination and the diagnostic results of professional endoscopist was used as the gold standard. The system diagnosis results was recorded at the same time. The sensitivity, delay time, specificity of lesions and anatomical landmarks will be analyzed.

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Outpatients undergoing magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy examination

You may qualify if:

  • With or without gastrointestinal complaints
  • Scheduled to undergo a capsule endoscopy for both stomach and small bowel
  • Signed the informed consents before joining this study

You may not qualify if:

  • Dysphagia or symptoms of gastric outlet obstruction, suspected or known intestinal stenosis, overt gastrointestinal bleeding, history of upper gastrointestinal surgery or abdominal surgery altering gastrointestinal anatomy
  • Refused abdominal surgery to take out the capsule in case of capsule retention
  • Implanted pacemaker, except the pacemaker is compatible with MRI
  • Other implanted electromedical devices or magnetic metal foreign bodies
  • Pregnancy or suspected pregnancy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Changhai Hospital

Shanghai, 200433, China

RECRUITING

Related Publications (4)

  • Liao Z, Duan XD, Xin L, Bo LM, Wang XH, Xiao GH, Hu LH, Zhuang SL, Li ZS. Feasibility and safety of magnetic-controlled capsule endoscopy system in examination of human stomach: a pilot study in healthy volunteers. J Interv Gastroenterol. 2012 Oct-Dec;2(4):155-160. doi: 10.4161/jig.23751. Epub 2012 Oct 1.

    PMID: 23687601BACKGROUND
  • Liao Z, Hou X, Lin-Hu EQ, Sheng JQ, Ge ZZ, Jiang B, Hou XH, Liu JY, Li Z, Huang QY, Zhao XJ, Li N, Gao YJ, Zhang Y, Zhou JQ, Wang XY, Liu J, Xie XP, Yang CM, Liu HL, Sun XT, Zou WB, Li ZS. Accuracy of Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy, Compared With Conventional Gastroscopy, in Detection of Gastric Diseases. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Sep;14(9):1266-1273.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.05.013. Epub 2016 May 20.

    PMID: 27211503BACKGROUND
  • Wu L, Zhang J, Zhou W, An P, Shen L, Liu J, Jiang X, Huang X, Mu G, Wan X, Lv X, Gao J, Cui N, Hu S, Chen Y, Hu X, Li J, Chen D, Gong D, He X, Ding Q, Zhu X, Li S, Wei X, Li X, Wang X, Zhou J, Zhang M, Yu HG. Randomised controlled trial of WISENSE, a real-time quality improving system for monitoring blind spots during esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Gut. 2019 Dec;68(12):2161-2169. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-317366. Epub 2019 Mar 11.

    PMID: 30858305BACKGROUND
  • Ding Z, Shi H, Zhang H, Meng L, Fan M, Han C, Zhang K, Ming F, Xie X, Liu H, Liu J, Lin R, Hou X. Gastroenterologist-Level Identification of Small-Bowel Diseases and Normal Variants by Capsule Endoscopy Using a Deep-Learning Model. Gastroenterology. 2019 Oct;157(4):1044-1054.e5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.06.025. Epub 2019 Jun 25.

    PMID: 31251929BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Zhuan Liao

    Changhai Hospital

    STUDY CHAIR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 16, 2019

First Posted

December 18, 2019

Study Start

December 16, 2019

Primary Completion

January 1, 2020

Study Completion

January 1, 2020

Last Updated

December 18, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations