Effect of Off-site Assistance on Success Rate of Selective Cannulation During hands-on ERCP Training
1 other identifier
interventional
600
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a technically challenging procedure. It takes time to learn the basic skills and need at least 180 - 200 cases for trainees to achieve competency in ERCP. Hands-on practice in patients remains the gold standard for ERCP training. Traditional hands-on ERCP training requires the trainer to be on-site to assist the trainee with ERCP operations. We hypothesized that the trainee can be safely guided by trainer off-site with interactive audio and endoscopic and fluoroscopic view. Technology-enabled health care at a distance has profound scientific potential and accordingly has been met with growing interest. Teleguidance facilitated ERCP cannulation is a strategy to provide expert cannulation guidance to trainee in settings where such expertise is not on-site. Teleguidance not only reduces unnecessary radiation exposure of endoscopist, but also provides remote assistance for trainees to complete training or further improve skills. Given the advantages of the off-site teleguidance, it could be an attractive substitute for on-site hands-on ERCP training. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate whether off-site assistance (Off group) could achieve a comparable success rate to on-site assistance (On group) regarding the rates of successful selective biliary cannulation during ERCP training.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Nov 2020
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 30, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 10, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 21, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2023
CompletedMay 31, 2023
May 1, 2023
2.9 years
February 10, 2022
May 28, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Success rate of selective cannulation by trainee
The rate of successful selective cannulation by trainee during the training period.
up to one year
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Complication rate
up to one year
Performance score of selective cannulation
up to one year
Final success rate of cannulation
up to one year
Total time of successful cannulation
up to one year
Radiation exposure time
up to one year
Study Arms (2)
Off-site assistance group
EXPERIMENTALThe trainer supervised the trainee's cannulation operation outside the procedure room through a high-definition screen displaying the endoscopic and fluoroscopic view. The trainer was allowed to provide unlimited verbal instructions to the trainee by an intercom. The trainer was not allowed to enter the procedure room and touch the endoscope or accessories until the trainee ask for help or failed to achieve deep biliary cannulation. The trainer would halt and correct the trainee's inappropriate maneuvers immediately to avoid unnecessary papillary trauma and potential complications. Then the trainer would then take over and continue with the cannulation.
On-site assistance group
NO INTERVENTIONThe trainer supervised the trainee's cannulation operation in the procedure room. The trainer was allowed to provide unlimited verbal instructions to the trainee on-site. The trainer was not allowed to touch the endoscope or accessories until the trainee ask for help or failed to achieve deep biliary cannulation. The trainer would halt and correct the trainee's inappropriate maneuvers immediately to avoid unnecessary papillary trauma and potential complications. Then the trainer would then take over and continue with the cannulation.
Interventions
The trainer supervised the trainee's cannulation operation outside the procedure room through a high-definition screen displaying the endoscopic and fluoroscopic view. The trainer was allowed to provide unlimited verbal instructions to the trainee by an intercom.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18-90 years old
- With native papilla
You may not qualify if:
- History of partial or total gastrectomy (Billroth I/II, Roux-en-Y)
- Type II duodenal stenosis
- Previously failed cannulation
- Chronic pancreatitis with stones in the pancreatic head
- Hemodynamic instability
- Lactating or pregnant women
- Inability to give written informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Endoscopic center, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases
Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710032, China
Related Publications (5)
Pan Y, Zhao L, Leung J, Zhang R, Luo H, Wang X, Liu Z, Wan B, Tao Q, Yao S, Hui N, Fan D, Wu K, Guo X. Appropriate time for selective biliary cannulation by trainees during ERCP--a randomized trial. Endoscopy. 2015 Aug;47(8):688-95. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1391564. Epub 2015 Mar 6.
PMID: 25750038BACKGROUNDWani S, Han S, Simon V, Hall M, Early D, Aagaard E, Abidi WM, Banerjee S, Baron TH, Bartel M, Bowman E, Brauer BC, Buscaglia JM, Carlin L, Chak A, Chatrath H, Choudhary A, Confer B, Cote GA, Das KK, DiMaio CJ, Dries AM, Edmundowicz SA, El Chafic AH, El Hajj I, Ellert S, Ferreira J, Gamboa A, Gan IS, Gangarosa L, Gannavarapu B, Gordon SR, Guda NM, Hammad HT, Harris C, Jalaj S, Jowell P, Kenshil S, Klapman J, Kochman ML, Komanduri S, Lang G, Lee LS, Loren DE, Lukens FJ, Mullady D, Muthusamy RV, Nett AS, Olyaee MS, Pakseresht K, Perera P, Pfau P, Piraka C, Poneros JM, Rastogi A, Razzak A, Riff B, Saligram S, Scheiman JM, Schuster I, Shah RJ, Sharma R, Spaete JP, Singh A, Sohail M, Sreenarasimhaiah J, Stevens T, Tabibian JH, Tzimas D, Uppal DS, Urayama S, Vitterbo D, Wang AY, Wassef W, Yachimski P, Zepeda-Gomez S, Zuchelli T, Keswani RN. Setting minimum standards for training in EUS and ERCP: results from a prospective multicenter study evaluating learning curves and competence among advanced endoscopy trainees. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Jun;89(6):1160-1168.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.01.030. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
PMID: 30738985BACKGROUNDPahlsson HI, Groth K, Permert J, Swahn F, Lohr M, Enochsson L, Lundell L, Arnelo U. Telemedicine: an important aid to perform high-quality endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in low-volume centers. Endoscopy. 2013;45(5):357-61. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1326269. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
PMID: 23468194BACKGROUNDBrinne Roos J, Bergenzaun P, Groth K, Lundell L, Arnelo U. Telepresence-teleguidance to facilitate training and quality assurance in ERCP: a health economic modeling approach. Endosc Int Open. 2020 Mar;8(3):E326-E337. doi: 10.1055/a-1068-9153. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
PMID: 32118106BACKGROUNDShimizu S, Itaba S, Yada S, Takahata S, Nakashima N, Okamura K, Rerknimitr R, Akaraviputh T, Lu X, Tanaka M. Significance of telemedicine for video image transmission of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasonography procedures. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2011 May;18(3):366-74. doi: 10.1007/s00534-010-0351-8.
PMID: 21127912BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 10, 2022
First Posted
February 21, 2022
Study Start
November 30, 2020
Primary Completion
November 1, 2023
Study Completion
December 1, 2023
Last Updated
May 31, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-05