NCT05248724

Brief Summary

A randomized controlled trial about periarticular injection and hamstring block versus placebo for pain control in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
44

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2017

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2017

Completed
3.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2020

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2020

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 6, 2022

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 21, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

March 8, 2022

Status Verified

February 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

3.1 years

First QC Date

February 6, 2022

Last Update Submit

February 21, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

postoperative analgesiaLocal Anestheticpostoperative pain

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Pain in the knee at 8 hours after surgery assessed by visual analog scale

    pain registered in the knee, which was measured using a 100-mm visual analog scale from 0 (no pain) to 100 (the worst pain)

    registered at 8 hours

  • Pain in the knee at 24 hours after surgery assessed by visual analog scale

    pain registered in the knee, which was measured using a 100-mm visual analog scale from 0 (no pain) to 100 (the worst pain)

    registered at 24 hours

  • Pain in the posterior proximal thigh at 8 hours after surgery assessed by visual analog scale

    pain registered in the posterior proximal thigh, which was measured using a 100-mm visual analog scale from 0 (no pain) to 100 (the worst pain)

    registered at 8 hours

  • Pain in the posterior proximal thigh at 24 hours after surgery assessed by visual analog scale

    pain registered in the posterior proximal thigh, which was measured using a 100-mm visual analog scale from 0 (no pain) to 100 (the worst pain)

    registered at 24 hours

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • analgesic rescue medication

    24 hours post operative

Study Arms (2)

Intervention,

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients allocated to the intervention group received a periarticular infiltration with a solution containing 200 mg of ropivacaine hydrochloride (10mg/ml Kabi Fresenius Kabi Norway AS),150 mg if the patient weight was below 65kg, 5 mg of morphine hydrochloride (10mg/ml Braun Medical SA Spain), 30 mg of ketorolac tromethamine (Normon Spain), 300 micrograms of adrenaline (epinephrine Braun Medical SA Spain), and saline 0.9% till reaching 50 ml of volume

Combination Product: periarticular infiltration (50ml) with Ropivacaine Hydrochloride 10 MG/ML (200 mg) + ketorolac tromethamine 30 mg/ml (30 mg) + adrenaline 1mg/ml (300 microgram) + morphine hydrochloride 10mg/ml (5 mg)

placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Participants in the placebo group received a periarticular infiltration of 50 ml of saline 0.9%.

Drug: placebo

Interventions

Patients allocated to the intervention group received a periarticular infiltration with a solution containing 200 mg of ropivacaine hydrochloride ,150 mg if the patient weight was below 65kg, 5 mg of morphine hydrochloride , 30 mg of ketorolac tromethamine, 300 micrograms of adrenaline and saline 0.9% till reaching 50 ml of volume. Half of the solution was injected into the proximal hamstring stump. The surgical team closed the wounds and injected the other half of the intervention into the subcutaneous tissue in the distal wound and portals. There was not any medication introduced inside the articulation. Patients of the placebo group were treated in the same way, but the solution injected was 50 ml of saline 0.9%.

Intervention,

50 ml of 0.9 saline

placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

You may not qualify if:

  • revision surgery.
  • reconstruction with a different graft from hamstring tendons.
  • Associated osteotomy.
  • Less than 50 kg, and allergy.
  • medical contraindication for any of the components of the periarticular infiltration or postoperative analgesic medical protocol.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Virgen de la Luz Hospital

Cuenca, 16004, Spain

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Kurosaka K, Tsukada S, Nakayama H, Iseki T, Kanto R, Sugama R, Yoshiya S. Periarticular Injection Versus Femoral Nerve Block for Pain Relief After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Arthroscopy. 2018 Jan;34(1):182-188. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.08.307. Epub 2017 Dec 6.

    PMID: 29203380BACKGROUND
  • Lefevre N, Klouche S, de Pamphilis O, Herman S, Gerometta A, Bohu Y. Peri-articular local infiltration analgesia versus femoral nerve block for postoperative pain control following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Prospective, comparative, non-inferiority study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016 Nov;102(7):873-877. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.07.011. Epub 2016 Oct 4.

    PMID: 27720193BACKGROUND
  • Bushnell BD, Sakryd G, Noonan TJ. Hamstring donor-site block: evaluation of pain control after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2010 Jul;26(7):894-900. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.11.022. Epub 2010 May 13.

    PMID: 20620788BACKGROUND
  • Jansson H, Narvy SJ, Mehran N. Perioperative Pain Management Strategies for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. JBJS Rev. 2018 Mar;6(3):e3. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.17.00059. No abstract available.

    PMID: 29533268BACKGROUND
  • Fauno P, Lund B, Christiansen SE, Gjoderum O, Lind M. Analgesic effect of hamstring block after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction compared with placebo: a prospective randomized trial. Arthroscopy. 2015 Jan;31(1):63-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.07.024. Epub 2014 Sep 17.

    PMID: 25239172BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain, Postoperative

Interventions

RopivacaineKetorolac TromethamineEpinephrine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Postoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AnilidesAmidesOrganic ChemicalsAniline CompoundsAminesIndomethacinIndolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsEthanolaminesAmino AlcoholsAlcoholsBiogenic MonoaminesBiogenic AminesCatecholaminesCatecholsPhenolsBenzene DerivativesHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbons

Study Officials

  • Joaquin De Lamo-Rovira, MD

    Virgen de La Luz Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Masking Details
The participants were not informed about what group (intervention or placebo) they were assigned.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: This study was a prospective single-blind, two arms, parallel-group
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 6, 2022

First Posted

February 21, 2022

Study Start

August 1, 2017

Primary Completion

September 1, 2020

Study Completion

October 1, 2020

Last Updated

March 8, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations