"Pontic-shield" Technique in Alveolar Ridge Preservation
Effectiveness of "Pontic-shield" Technique in Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Alveolar bone resorption after dental extraction frequently leads to situations in which long-term function and esthetic success of rehabilitations with dental implants is a challenge. "Pontic-shield" has been described as an alternative technique to maintain alveolar ridge after tooth extraction. The aim of this study is to analyze the effectiveness of "Pontic-shield" technique in alveolar ridge preservation comparing to fresh socket and ridge preservation using deproteinized bovine bone and a porcine collagen membrane.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2023
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 23, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 15, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2024
CompletedAugust 20, 2024
August 1, 2024
10 months
January 23, 2022
August 19, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Bone resorption
Radiographic changes between preoperative (prior to tooth extraction) and postoperative (4 months after intervention) will be analyzed. This variation will be assessed by measuring changes in width and height (in millimeters) of the socket by superimposition of CBCT before and after the intervention.
From the day of the extraction to 4 months after
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Satisfaction assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS)
From the day of the surgical procedure to the seventh-day
Study Arms (3)
Study group
EXPERIMENTAL"Pontic-shield" will be performed as ridge preservation technique.
Positive control (ridge preservation)
ACTIVE COMPARATORDeproteinized bovine bone and porcine collagen membrane will be placed after tooth extraction.
Negative control (fresh socket)
NO INTERVENTIONNo intervention will be performed after tooth extraction. Blood clot will be maintained after extraction.
Interventions
A 1mm thick fragment of the vestibular aspect of the root will remain after extraction (partial extraction)
Particulate deproteinized bovine bone and porcine collagen membrane will be placed after tooth extraction
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient from 18 to 80 years old
- Patients who sign the informed consent
- Need to perform extraction from second premolar to second premolar in maxilla and mandible
You may not qualify if:
- Tobacco consumption (more than 10 cigarettes per day)
- Severe systemic disease ( ASA III or IV - American Society of Anaesthesiology)
- Drug use that could interfere with alveolar bone healing
- Active periodontal disease
- Acute or chronic apical pathology of the tooth
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Luis Miguel Sáez-Alcaide
Madrid, 28011, Spain
Related Publications (5)
Avila-Ortiz G, Chambrone L, Vignoletti F. Effect of alveolar ridge preservation interventions following tooth extraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2019 Jun;46 Suppl 21:195-223. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13057. Erratum In: J Clin Periodontol. 2020 Jan;47(1):129. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13212.
PMID: 30623987BACKGROUNDCanullo L, Del Fabbro M, Khijmatgar S, Panda S, Ravida A, Tommasato G, Sculean A, Pesce P. Dimensional and histomorphometric evaluation of biomaterials used for alveolar ridge preservation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Jan;26(1):141-158. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04248-1. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
PMID: 34826029BACKGROUNDSaez-Alcaide LM, Gonzalez Fernandez-Tresguerres F, Cortes-Breton Brinkmann J, Segura-Mori L, Iglesias-Velazquez O, Perez-Gonzalez F, Lopez-Pintor RM, Torres Garcia-Denche J. Socket shield technique: A systematic review of human studies. Ann Anat. 2021 Nov;238:151779. doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2021.151779. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
PMID: 34087383BACKGROUNDHurzeler MB, Zuhr O, Schupbach P, Rebele SF, Emmanouilidis N, Fickl S. The socket-shield technique: a proof-of-principle report. J Clin Periodontol. 2010 Sep;37(9):855-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01595.x.
PMID: 20712701BACKGROUNDAraujo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 2005 Feb;32(2):212-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00642.x.
PMID: 15691354BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 23, 2022
First Posted
February 15, 2022
Study Start
January 1, 2023
Primary Completion
November 1, 2023
Study Completion
December 1, 2024
Last Updated
August 20, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share