The Assessment of Immune Response in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Patients Treated With Pembrolizumab
PIRG
A Single Center, Open-Label, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Pembrolizumab on Top of Standard Chemo-Radiotherapy (Stupp Protocol) in Treatment of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM).
1 other identifier
interventional
36
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To evaluate the short-term and longer-term safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of neoadjuvant and adjuvant Pembrolizumab on top of standard therapy (Stupp protocol) in patients with Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM). Randomized comparison of safety, tolerability, and clinical efficacy of (1) neoadjuvant and adjuvant Pembrolizumab (on top of Stupp protocol, n=12 patients), (2) neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab (on top of Stupp protocol, n=12 patients), and (3) standard of care (Stupp protocol only, n=12 patients). Immuno-PET examination will be performed before and after surgery in all patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Mar 2022
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 1, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 11, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 30, 2026
ExpectedAugust 31, 2023
August 1, 2023
3.3 years
February 1, 2022
August 28, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Overall survival
Proportion of patients remaining alive from initial tumor resection
3 years after initial tumor surgery
Progression-free survival
Time from initial tumor resection to the first occurrence of progression/relapse or death from any cause, whichever occurs first
3 years after initial tumor surgery
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Time-to-progression
3 years after initial tumor surgery
Other Outcomes (1)
Usability assessment of immuno-PET imaging with 89Zr-DFO-Atezolizumab for quantitative analysis of early changes in PD-L1 expression
48 hours after surgery
Study Arms (3)
Treatment arm 1
ACTIVE COMPARATORn=12 evaluable patients - neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab (2 doses, 200mg each) plus adjuvant Pembrolizumab (16 cycles q3w, 200mg each) on top of standard chemo-radiotherapy (Stupp protocol: radiotherapy 60Gy over 6 weeks, 2 Gy per daily fraction Mo-Fri setting plus Temozolomide 75mg/m2 of body surface area (BSA) daily during radiotherapy and six cycles post-radiotherapy of 150-200mg/m2 for 5 days in each 28-day cycle)
Treatment arm 2
ACTIVE COMPARATORn=12 evaluable patients - neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab (2 doses, 200mg each) on top of standard chemo-radiotherapy (Stupp protocol: radiotherapy 60Gy over 6 weeks, 2 Gy per daily fraction Mo-Fri setting plus Temozolomide 75mg/m2 BSA daily during radiotherapy and six cycles post-radiotherapy of 150-200mg/m2 for 5 days in each 28-day cycle)
Treatment arm 3
NO INTERVENTIONn=12 evaluable patients - standard chemo-radiotherapy (Stupp protocol: radiotherapy 60Gy over 6 weeks, 2 Gy per daily fraction Mo-Fri setting plus Temozolomide 75mg/m2 BSA daily during radiotherapy and six cycles post-radiotherapy of 150-200mg/m2 for 5 days in each 28-day cycle)
Interventions
Adding Pembrolizumab as a neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy to the standard of care protocol
Eligibility Criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from study entry:
- Any active concomitant malignancy, except:
- Locally treated basal or squamous cell carcinoma
- Cervical carcinoma in situ
- Breast cancer in situ
- Bladder cancer in situ
- Low grade prostate cancer (under observation with PSA level in normal range)
- Any previous systemic cancer treatment, including, but not limited to:
- Radiotherapy
- Brachytherapy for brain tumor
- Chemotherapy
- Carmustine wafer treatment (Gliadel®)
- Any immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy or any anticancer vaccination
- Hypersensitivity or allergy to any substance with similar action mechanism to Pembrolizumab, Atezolizumab, Temozolomide, other monoclonal antibodies or contrast agents
- Any active immunosuppressive systemic therapy (except corticosteroids under 12mg)
- +19 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Wojciech Kaspera
Sosnowiec, Silesian, 41-200, Poland
Related Publications (15)
Lammers PE, Dank M, Masetti R, Abbas R, Hilton F, Coppola J, Jacobs I. Neoadjuvant PF-05280014 (a potential trastuzumab biosimilar) versus trastuzumab for operable HER2+ breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2018 Aug;119(3):266-273. doi: 10.1038/s41416-018-0147-1. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
PMID: 30002437BACKGROUNDWolchok JD, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, Rutkowski P, Grob JJ, Cowey CL, Lao CD, Wagstaff J, Schadendorf D, Ferrucci PF, Smylie M, Dummer R, Hill A, Hogg D, Haanen J, Carlino MS, Bechter O, Maio M, Marquez-Rodas I, Guidoboni M, McArthur G, Lebbe C, Ascierto PA, Long GV, Cebon J, Sosman J, Postow MA, Callahan MK, Walker D, Rollin L, Bhore R, Hodi FS, Larkin J. Overall Survival with Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2017 Oct 5;377(14):1345-1356. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1709684. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
PMID: 28889792BACKGROUNDZhao J, Chen AX, Gartrell RD, Silverman AM, Aparicio L, Chu T, Bordbar D, Shan D, Samanamud J, Mahajan A, Filip I, Orenbuch R, Goetz M, Yamaguchi JT, Cloney M, Horbinski C, Lukas RV, Raizer J, Rae AI, Yuan J, Canoll P, Bruce JN, Saenger YM, Sims P, Iwamoto FM, Sonabend AM, Rabadan R. Immune and genomic correlates of response to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in glioblastoma. Nat Med. 2019 Mar;25(3):462-469. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0349-y. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
PMID: 30742119BACKGROUNDBensch F, van der Veen EL, Lub-de Hooge MN, Jorritsma-Smit A, Boellaard R, Kok IC, Oosting SF, Schroder CP, Hiltermann TJN, van der Wekken AJ, Groen HJM, Kwee TC, Elias SG, Gietema JA, Bohorquez SS, de Crespigny A, Williams SP, Mancao C, Brouwers AH, Fine BM, de Vries EGE. 89Zr-atezolizumab imaging as a non-invasive approach to assess clinical response to PD-L1 blockade in cancer. Nat Med. 2018 Dec;24(12):1852-1858. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0255-8. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
PMID: 30478423BACKGROUNDLiu J, Blake SJ, Yong MC, Harjunpaa H, Ngiow SF, Takeda K, Young A, O'Donnell JS, Allen S, Smyth MJ, Teng MW. Improved Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Compared to Adjuvant Immunotherapy to Eradicate Metastatic Disease. Cancer Discov. 2016 Dec;6(12):1382-1399. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-16-0577. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
PMID: 27663893BACKGROUNDForde PM, Chaft JE, Smith KN, Anagnostou V, Cottrell TR, Hellmann MD, Zahurak M, Yang SC, Jones DR, Broderick S, Battafarano RJ, Velez MJ, Rekhtman N, Olah Z, Naidoo J, Marrone KA, Verde F, Guo H, Zhang J, Caushi JX, Chan HY, Sidhom JW, Scharpf RB, White J, Gabrielson E, Wang H, Rosner GL, Rusch V, Wolchok JD, Merghoub T, Taube JM, Velculescu VE, Topalian SL, Brahmer JR, Pardoll DM. Neoadjuvant PD-1 Blockade in Resectable Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018 May 24;378(21):1976-1986. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1716078. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
PMID: 29658848BACKGROUNDAmaria RN, Reddy SM, Tawbi HA, Davies MA, Ross MI, Glitza IC, Cormier JN, Lewis C, Hwu WJ, Hanna E, Diab A, Wong MK, Royal R, Gross N, Weber R, Lai SY, Ehlers R, Blando J, Milton DR, Woodman S, Kageyama R, Wells DK, Hwu P, Patel SP, Lucci A, Hessel A, Lee JE, Gershenwald J, Simpson L, Burton EM, Posada L, Haydu L, Wang L, Zhang S, Lazar AJ, Hudgens CW, Gopalakrishnan V, Reuben A, Andrews MC, Spencer CN, Prieto V, Sharma P, Allison J, Tetzlaff MT, Wargo JA. Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade in high-risk resectable melanoma. Nat Med. 2018 Nov;24(11):1649-1654. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0197-1. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
PMID: 30297909BACKGROUNDBlank CU, Rozeman EA, Fanchi LF, Sikorska K, van de Wiel B, Kvistborg P, Krijgsman O, van den Braber M, Philips D, Broeks A, van Thienen JV, Mallo HA, Adriaansz S, Ter Meulen S, Pronk LM, Grijpink-Ongering LG, Bruining A, Gittelman RM, Warren S, van Tinteren H, Peeper DS, Haanen JBAG, van Akkooi ACJ, Schumacher TN. Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant ipilimumab plus nivolumab in macroscopic stage III melanoma. Nat Med. 2018 Nov;24(11):1655-1661. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0198-0. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
PMID: 30297911BACKGROUNDCloughesy TF, Mochizuki AY, Orpilla JR, Hugo W, Lee AH, Davidson TB, Wang AC, Ellingson BM, Rytlewski JA, Sanders CM, Kawaguchi ES, Du L, Li G, Yong WH, Gaffey SC, Cohen AL, Mellinghoff IK, Lee EQ, Reardon DA, O'Brien BJ, Butowski NA, Nghiemphu PL, Clarke JL, Arrillaga-Romany IC, Colman H, Kaley TJ, de Groot JF, Liau LM, Wen PY, Prins RM. Neoadjuvant anti-PD-1 immunotherapy promotes a survival benefit with intratumoral and systemic immune responses in recurrent glioblastoma. Nat Med. 2019 Mar;25(3):477-486. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0337-7. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
PMID: 30742122BACKGROUNDSchalper KA, Rodriguez-Ruiz ME, Diez-Valle R, Lopez-Janeiro A, Porciuncula A, Idoate MA, Inoges S, de Andrea C, Lopez-Diaz de Cerio A, Tejada S, Berraondo P, Villarroel-Espindola F, Choi J, Gurpide A, Giraldez M, Goicoechea I, Gallego Perez-Larraya J, Sanmamed MF, Perez-Gracia JL, Melero I. Neoadjuvant nivolumab modifies the tumor immune microenvironment in resectable glioblastoma. Nat Med. 2019 Mar;25(3):470-476. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0339-5. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
PMID: 30742120BACKGROUNDWeber JS, D'Angelo SP, Minor D, Hodi FS, Gutzmer R, Neyns B, Hoeller C, Khushalani NI, Miller WH Jr, Lao CD, Linette GP, Thomas L, Lorigan P, Grossmann KF, Hassel JC, Maio M, Sznol M, Ascierto PA, Mohr P, Chmielowski B, Bryce A, Svane IM, Grob JJ, Krackhardt AM, Horak C, Lambert A, Yang AS, Larkin J. Nivolumab versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma who progressed after anti-CTLA-4 treatment (CheckMate 037): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Apr;16(4):375-84. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70076-8. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
PMID: 25795410BACKGROUNDRizvi NA, Mazieres J, Planchard D, Stinchcombe TE, Dy GK, Antonia SJ, Horn L, Lena H, Minenza E, Mennecier B, Otterson GA, Campos LT, Gandara DR, Levy BP, Nair SG, Zalcman G, Wolf J, Souquet PJ, Baldini E, Cappuzzo F, Chouaid C, Dowlati A, Sanborn R, Lopez-Chavez A, Grohe C, Huber RM, Harbison CT, Baudelet C, Lestini BJ, Ramalingam SS. Activity and safety of nivolumab, an anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor, for patients with advanced, refractory squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (CheckMate 063): a phase 2, single-arm trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Mar;16(3):257-65. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70054-9. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
PMID: 25704439BACKGROUNDRobert C, Ribas A, Schachter J, Arance A, Grob JJ, Mortier L, Daud A, Carlino MS, McNeil CM, Lotem M, Larkin JMG, Lorigan P, Neyns B, Blank CU, Petrella TM, Hamid O, Su SC, Krepler C, Ibrahim N, Long GV. Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma (KEYNOTE-006): post-hoc 5-year results from an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2019 Sep;20(9):1239-1251. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30388-2. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
PMID: 31345627BACKGROUNDPowles T, Eder JP, Fine GD, Braiteh FS, Loriot Y, Cruz C, Bellmunt J, Burris HA, Petrylak DP, Teng SL, Shen X, Boyd Z, Hegde PS, Chen DS, Vogelzang NJ. MPDL3280A (anti-PD-L1) treatment leads to clinical activity in metastatic bladder cancer. Nature. 2014 Nov 27;515(7528):558-62. doi: 10.1038/nature13904.
PMID: 25428503BACKGROUNDOmuro A, Vlahovic G, Lim M, Sahebjam S, Baehring J, Cloughesy T, Voloschin A, Ramkissoon SH, Ligon KL, Latek R, Zwirtes R, Strauss L, Paliwal P, Harbison CT, Reardon DA, Sampson JH. Nivolumab with or without ipilimumab in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: results from exploratory phase I cohorts of CheckMate 143. Neuro Oncol. 2018 Apr 9;20(5):674-686. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nox208.
PMID: 29106665BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- Open Label
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 1, 2022
First Posted
February 11, 2022
Study Start
March 1, 2022
Primary Completion
June 1, 2025
Study Completion (Estimated)
May 30, 2026
Last Updated
August 31, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share