Can Mindfulness and Self-monitoring Improve Control Over Maladaptive Daydreaming?
Can Mindfulness Meditation and Self-monitoring Can Help Improve Control Over Maladaptive Daydreaming: A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Self-guided Web-based Program
1 other identifier
interventional
697
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Maladaptive daydreaming (MD) is a compulsive form of daydreaming that causes distress and functional impairment among tens of thousands of self-diagnosed sufferers. This is the first controlled treatment trial for MD. The investigators built an internet-based self-help program for MD and tested the effectiveness of mindfulness and self-monitoring in improving control over MD, comparing three groups across three measurement points in time.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Dec 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 20, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 3, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 28, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 19, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 11, 2022
CompletedFebruary 11, 2022
February 1, 2022
1.1 years
January 19, 2022
February 9, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change from baseline in maladaptive daydreaming
Change in the 16-item Maladaptive Daydreaming Scale (MDS-16) compared to baseline, measured 2 months and 6 months post-intervention. The MDS-16 is the primary self-report scale that gauges maladaptive daydreaming on a 10-point Likert scale. Scores range from 0 to 100, with the mean score of 40 set as an evidence-based cut-off score for clinical-level MD. Higher scores indicate an elevated level of maladaptive daydreaming, hence, a worse outcome.
Baseline, post, and follow-up (8 month total)
Change from baseline in daydreaming frequency
Change in the Daydreaming Frequency Scale (DDFS) compared to baseline, measured 2 months and 6 months post-intervention. The DDFS is a 12-item subscale of the Imaginal Processes Inventory, gauging reported daydreaming frequency. Items are marked on a 5-point Likert scale. Scores range from 12 to 60. Higher scores indicate an elevated frequency of daydreaming, hence, a worse outcome.
Baseline, post, and follow-up (8 month total)
Change from baseline in work and social adjustment
Change in the Daydreaming Work and Social Adjustment Scale (DWSAS) compared to baseline, measured 2 months and 6 months post-intervention. The DWSAS is a 6-item measure assessing adjustment and disfunction in relation to daydreaming. Items are ranked on a 9-point Likert scale ranging from 0 to 8. The DWSAS scores range from 0 to 48. A score of 12 or lower indicates "no pathology and disfunction". Scores between 12 and 24 indicate "pathology and impaired function", while scores of 24 or above suggest "severe pathology and impaired function".
Baseline, post, and follow-up (8 month total)
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Change from baseline in psychiatric symptoms
Baseline, post, and follow-up (8 month total)
Change from baseline in intervention outcome
Baseline, post, and follow-up (8 month total)
Other Outcomes (3)
Change from baseline mindful attention awareness
Baseline, post, and follow-up (8 month total)
The Feedback Questionnaire
Post-intervention, and follow-up (6 month total)
The Childhood Trauma Questionnaire
Baseline (1 day)
Study Arms (3)
The Full Intervention (FI) group
EXPERIMENTALThe full intervention (FI) group received a psycho-education module about MD and its addictive behavior mechanism, a motivation enhancement module based on motivational interviewing, mindfulness modules, and self-monitoring modules.
The partial intervention (PI) group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe partial intervention (PI) group received an intervention identical to the FI group (a psycho-education module about MD and its addictive behavior mechanism, a motivation enhancement module based on motivational interviewing, mindfulness modules) with the exclusion of the self-monitoring modules.
Waiting List (WL) group
NO INTERVENTIONWaiting List (WL) group did not undergo any intervention during the study period. However, WL participants were told that the program will commence in three months. During their waiting time participants were instructed to reduce their daydreaming activity to the best of their ability. Since all participants were recruited for this study from an online support forum (that is not part of this research design), the investigators labeled WL as the Internet Support as Usual (ISAU) group.
Interventions
An 8-weeks internet-based self-guided intervention program, accompanied by e-mail. The content of the intervention and training modules comprised texts, illustrations, explanatory video and audio lectures, as well as interactive worksheets embedded in each week's lesson. Typically, a lesson started with a textual description of its target and duration. Then, participants received a summary of what had been taught thus far, and finally, a novel technique or skill was introduced. Each lesson required about 60 minutes to complete. Users had open access to web pages of previous lessons. Upon completion of each lesson, participants received a list of home assignments to practice during the following week. Our internet-based program featured a notification and download center containing the program's materials and pertinent messages from the researchers.
An 8-weeks internet-based self-guided intervention program, accompanied by e-mail. The content of the intervention and training modules comprised texts, illustrations, explanatory video and audio lectures, as well as interactive worksheets embedded in each week's lesson. Typically, a lesson started with a textual description of its target and duration. Then, participants received a summary of what had been taught thus far, and finally, a novel technique or skill was introduced. Each lesson required about 60 minutes to complete. Users had open access to web pages of previous lessons. Upon completion of each lesson, participants received a list of home assignments to practice during the following week. Our internet-based program featured a notification and download center containing the program's materials and pertinent messages from the researchers.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age above 18 years
- MD diagnosis
- Not being in any concurrent treatment for MD
- English fluent
- Daily access to the internet, and to a device with internet access
- Give informed consent to the study
- Respondents who reported being on a stable dose of medication for at least three months could take part in the study provided that they did not change their dosages while participating in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Age under 18 years
- No MD diagnosis
- In concurrent psychology therapy for MD
- Not fluent in English
- Not having a daily internet access
- Taking medication for less than three months
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Haifa
Haifa, 3498838, Israel
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Oren Herscu, PhD
School of Social Work, University of Haifa, Israel
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Eli Somer, PhD
School of Social Work, University of Haifa, Israel
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nirit Soffer-Dudek, PhD
Department of Psychology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor Eli Somer
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 19, 2022
First Posted
February 11, 2022
Study Start
December 20, 2018
Primary Completion
February 3, 2020
Study Completion
February 28, 2021
Last Updated
February 11, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Non