Patient-driven Internet Delivered Psychological Treatment
1 other identifier
interventional
56
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The effect of iCBT for adults with anxiety disorders is well-known. However, drop-out rates are common. In recent years more focus has been directed to the importance of patients being active agents in their own care and to increase the patient´s involvement in health care. Studies show that involving patients´ in treatment decisions and management of their own health care can contribute to better treatment outcomes and more appropriate use of health care service. Few studies have evaluated patient involvement in iCBT-treatment. This study aims to evaluate the effect of patient-driven iCBT-treatment for patients with anxiety disorders seeking primary care in a randomized controlled trial. The study investigates the effect of patient-driven iCBT treatment of perceptions of being able to control the treatment and on drop-out from treatment. In addition, secondary research questions investigate measures of empowerment, anxiety and depression symptoms, general disability, satisfaction with treatment and feelings of being able to cope with one's mental illness in patient-driven iCBT.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 17, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 30, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 30, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 30, 2021
CompletedMay 1, 2023
April 1, 2023
1.4 years
December 17, 2020
April 28, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Questions of perceptions in how much one has been able to control the treatment
Perceptions in how much one has been able to control the treatment is measured by a questionnaire developed by the researchers for this study. The questionnaire consists of 9 items and each item is answered on a seven-point scale, from "Not at all" to "To a large extent".
At the end of treatment (after 8-16 weeks depending on treatment condition)
Adherence to treatment
Adherence to treatment is measured by counting number of completed modules in the treatment program for each participant
At the end of treatment (after 8-16 weeks depending on treatment condition)
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Changes in feelings of empowerment
Baseline (Pre-treatment), Middle of treatment, At the end of treatment (after 8-16 weeks depending on treatment condition) and by 3 months follow up
Perceptions of being able to cope with one's mental illness
At the end of treatment (after 8-16 weeks depending on treatment condition) and by 3 months follow up
Satisfaction with treatment
At the end of treatment (after 8-16 weeks depending on treatment condition) and by 3 months follow up
Changes in Anxiety symptoms
Baseline (Pre-treatment), Middle of treatment, At the end of treatment (after 8-16 weeks depending on treatment condition) and by 3 months follow up
Changes in Depressive symptoms
Baseline (Pre-treatment), middle of treatment, At the end of treatment (after 8-16 weeks depending on the treatment condition) and by 3 months follow up
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Patient-driven iCBT
EXPERIMENTALParticipants who are randomized to the experimental condition are asked to make choices regarding the structure of their treatment program
Standardized iCBT (TAU)
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients who are randomized to the control condition undergo the usual iCBT program available for anxiety disorders for a standardized time period of 8 weeks
Interventions
1\) Participants who are randomized to the experimental condition are asked to make choices regarding the structure of their treatment by the time of the randomization call. The participant can choose which of the available treatment programs (targeting anxiety, worry, stress, sleep disorders or depression) they want to undergo, how many modules in the treatment program they want to complete and in what order, for how many weeks they want to complete the treatment as well as how much telephone contact and how much written contact they want to have with their therapist.
2\) Patients who are randomized to the control condition (standardized iCBT) undergo the usual iCBT program available for anxiety disorders for 8 weeks. The psychologist provide weekly feedback on the patient's exercises and interact with the patient via secure encrypted messages in the treatment program. A follow-up telephone call takes place at the middle of treatment and at the end of the treatment.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Has reached the age of 18
- Has access to a computer with internet connection
- Speak and understand Swedish
- Meets the diagnostic criteria for an anxiety disorder (social anxiety, GAD (Generalized Anxiety Disorder), panic disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder or unspecified anxiety disorder)
You may not qualify if:
- has started medication for mental illness or made major changes regarding the medication during the past 4 weeks
- has serious suicidal thoughts or suicidal plans
- has complex comorbidity or is in need of other care for mental illness in addition to iCBT
- is receiving other psychological treatment during the treatment period
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Psychology, University of Gothenburg
Gothenburg, Sweden
Related Publications (1)
Nissling L, Kraepelien M, Kaldo V, Hange D, Larsson A, Persson M, Weineland S. Effects of patient-driven iCBT for anxiety in routine primary care and the relation between increased experience of empowerment and outcome: A randomized controlled trial. Internet Interv. 2021 Sep 21;26:100456. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100456. eCollection 2021 Dec.
PMID: 34603972DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Linnea Nissling, Phd-student
Department of Psychology, University of Gothenburg, Sweden
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Martin Kraepelien, PhD
Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Viktor Kaldo, Professor
Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Dominique Hange, Docent
General Medicine, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, Sweden
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Anna Larsson, Psy M
Research, Development, Education and Innovation, Primary Health Care, Region Västra Götaland,Sweden
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sandra Weineland, Docent
Department of Psychology, University of Gothenburg, Sweden
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- The groups are predetermined based on the tool randomizer.org and blinded to the researcher assigning the participants to groups.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 17, 2020
First Posted
December 30, 2020
Study Start
November 1, 2019
Primary Completion
March 30, 2021
Study Completion
March 30, 2021
Last Updated
May 1, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
We will share the data if a corresponding author or otherwise authorized person asks for it