Trial Evaluating the Tailored Versus the Systematic Use of Defunctioning Stoma After Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer (GRECCAR17)
GRECCAR17
A Phase III Randomized Trial Evaluating the Tailored Versus the Systematic Use of Defunctioning Stoma After Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer
1 other identifier
interventional
212
1 country
28
Brief Summary
GRECCAR 17 will be the first prospective and randomized trial to assess a tailored policy in the use of defunctioning stoma after TME according to the personalized risk of anastomotic leakage. The tailored use of defunctioning stoma after TME for rectal cancer should improve both the quality of life of patients and the anorectal function, without any impact on anastomotic leakage. Moreover, for the healthcare system, this new approach could be a cost-effective strategy, leading to a decrease in healthcare expenses. The main objective is to compare the impact of tailored defunctioning stoma after TME for rectal cancer versus the systematic use of defunctioning stoma on the evolution of the specific Quality Of Life (QLQC30) during the 12 months after surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Mar 2022
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
28 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 8, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 10, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 24, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2025
CompletedMay 16, 2024
May 1, 2024
3.4 years
November 8, 2021
May 14, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Quality of life over the 12 months after surgery
The QLQ-C30 is a patient self-rating questionnaire (30 questions) that measures physical, role, social, emotional, and cognitive functions as well as overall QoL. Scores can be linearly transformed to provide a score from 0 to 100 REF. Higher scores represent better functioning on the functional scales and a higher level of symptoms of the symptom scales. The area under the quality of life curve will be measured over the 12 months after rectal surgery, with measurement time points at 1, 4, 8 and 12 months.
At 1, 4, 8, and 12 months of follow-up
Secondary Outcomes (21)
Proportion of anastomotic leakage
At 1 and 4 months after the rectal surgery
The PF, RF, CF, EF, SF, FA, PA, NV, QL Dimensions of the QLQ-C30 questionnaire
At 1, 4, 8 and 12 months after the rectal surgery
The urinary frequency
At 1, 4, 8, and 12 months post-surgery
Blood or mucus in stools
At 1, 4, 8, and 12 months post-surgery
Stool frequency
At 1, 4, 8, and 12 months post-surgery
- +16 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Arm A: Tailored use of defunctioning stoma after TME
EXPERIMENTALThe tailored use of defunctioning stoma includes two steps: * Firstly, the decision to use or not a defunctioning stoma will be based on the personalized risk of anastomotic leakage (according to AFOR score). This score is ranked from 0 to 6, and includes gender, Body Mass Index, smoking, diabetes, tumor size and preoperative radiotherapy. * Patients with AFORS equal to 0 or 1 (risk of anastomotic leakage less than 10%) will not have defunctioning stoma; * Patients with AFORS equal to or between 2 and 6 (risk of anastomotic leakage more than 20%) will have a defunctioning stoma. * Secondly, in patients with a defunctioning stoma, an early closure will be performed day 8-12 after TME if: * No fever postoperatively (≤ 38°C), * CRP at day 2 lower than 115mg/L (+/- 10 mg/L), decreasing at day 4, * CT-scan with colonic contrast retrograde enema showing no anastomotic leakage.
Arm B: Systematic use of defunctioning stoma
ACTIVE COMPARATORSystematic use of defunctioning stoma for 3 months after TME according to French national guidelines
Interventions
Tailored use of defunctioning stoma after TME based on a 2-step process: i) to perform or not a defunctioning stoma according to the personalized risk of anastomotic leakage (defunctioning stoma only if Anastomotic Failure Observed Risk Score=\[2-6\]), ii) to perform an early stoma closure at day 8-12, according to clinical (fever), biological (CRP level days 2 and 4 postoperatively) and radiological postoperative assessment (CT-scan with colonic contrast retrograde enema day 7-8 postoperatively)
Systematic use of defunctioning stoma for 2-3 months after TME, according to French national and international guidelines
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18-80 years;
- Rectal adenocarcinoma (histologically proven)
- No metastasis or medical history of colorectal metastasis (M0)
- Patients with rectal cancer \< 12 cm from the anal verge (determined by rectal examination or MRI)
- Patients operated on by mini-invasive TME (laparoscopic, robotic or TaTME);
- With or without neo adjuvant treatment
- Realize a stapling anastomosis \< 7 cm from the anal verge (determined by rectal examination or MRI)
- Patients with expected defunctioning ileostomy
- Appropriate hematologic function: hemoglobin ≥ 10.5 g/dL, leukocytes \> 4000/mm3, blood platelets \> 100,000/mm3);
- Appropriate renal function (serum creatinine \< 15 mg/dL);
- Effective contraception of childbearing age : Male patients and premenopausal women should agree to use two medically validated contraceptive methods (one for the patient et one for the partner) during the study
- Patient affiliated or beneficiary to a health security system;
- Patient and doctor have signed informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with rectal cancer requiring TME surgery with handsewn anastomosis;
- Patients operated on by open approach;
- Previous pelvic irradiation for reasons other than rectal cancer
- Concomitant cancer or medical history of cancer within 5 years other than cancers treated in situ (cervical carcinoma or basocellular carcinoma or spinocellular carcinoma)
- Patients with expected defunctioning colostomy;
- Patients with perforated rectal cancer or preoperative pelvic sepsis;
- Patients with inflammatory bowel disease and/or bowel obstruction,
- Patients operated on in emergency;
- Patients with poor nutrition (Albumin \< 34 g/L, pre-Alb \< 0.14 g/L)
- Patients with extended-TME or pelvic exenteration (prostate);
- Patients with history of heart or vascular ischemia;
- Severe heart disease or congestive heart disease;
- Patients with immunodeficiency and/or under corticotherapy;
- Severe lung disease or respiratory failure;
- Severe kidney disease;
- +4 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (28)
CHU Amiens-Picardie - Service de Chirurgie Digestive
Amiens, France
CHRU de Besançon - Service de Chirurgie Générale, Digestive et Cancérologique - Unité de Transplantation Hépatique
Besançon, France
CHU de Bordeaux - Service de Chirurgie Digestive et Endocrinienne - Unité Colorectale
Bordeaux, France
Clinique Tivoli Ducos - Service de Chirurgie Digestive
Bordeaux, France
CHU de Clermont-Ferrand - Service de Chirurgie Digestive et Hépato-biliaire
Clermont-Ferrand, France
APHP - Hôpital Beaujon - Service de Chirurgie Digestive
Clichy, France
CHU Grenoble Alpes - Service de Chirurgie Digestive
La Tronche, France
APHP - Hôpital Bicêtre - Service de Chirurgie Générale et Digestive
Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
CHU de Lille - Service de Chirurgie Générale et Digestive
Lille, France
Centre Lyonnais de Chirurgie Digestive
Lyon, France
APHM - Hôpital La Timone - Service de Chirurgie Digestive et Générale
Marseille, France
APHM - Hôpital Nord - Service de Chirurgie Digestive
Marseille, France
Hôpital Européen de Marseille - Service de Chirurgie Digestive
Marseille, France
Institut Paoli Calmette - Service de Chirurgie Digestive
Marseille, France
Institut du Cancer de Montpellier - Service de Chirurgie Digestive
Montpellier, France
APHP - HEGP- Service de Chirurgie Digestive
Paris, France
APHP - Hôpital Saint Antoine - Service de Chirurgie Digestive
Paris, France
APHP - Hôpital Saint-Louis - Service de Chirurgie Viscérale, Cancérologique et Endocrinienne
Paris, France
GH Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon - Service de Chirurgie Digestive
Paris, France
Groupe Hospitalier Paris St. Joseph - Service de Chirurgie Digestive et Obésité
Paris, France
Hospices Civils de Lyon - Sevice de Chirurgie Digestive
Pierre-Bénite, France
CHU de Rennes - Service de Chirurgie Hépatobiliaire et Digestive
Rennes, France
CHU de Rouen - Service de Chirugie Digestive
Rouen, France
CHRU de Strasbourg - Service de Chirurgie Générale et
Strasbourg, France
CHU de Toulouse - Service de Chirurgie Digestive
Toulouse, France
CHRU de Tours - Service de Chirurgie Digestive Oncologique et Colorectale
Tours, France
CHRU de Nancy - Service de Chirugie Digestive, Hépatobiliaire, endocrinienne et Cancérologique
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
Institut Gustave Roussy - Service de Chirurgie Viscérale Oncologique
Villejuif, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Christophe LAURENT
University Hospital, Bordeaux
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 8, 2021
First Posted
February 10, 2022
Study Start
March 24, 2022
Primary Completion
September 1, 2025
Study Completion
September 1, 2025
Last Updated
May 16, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-05