Robotic Versus Hybrid Assisted Ventral Hernia Repair
ROHYB
Robotic Assisted vs. Laparoscopic Hybrid IPOM Ventral Hernia Repair: a Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Postoperative Outcomes
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) may be associated with chronic pain, seroma formation, bulging and failure to restore abdominal wall function. These outcomes are risk factors for hernia recurrence and poor quality of life (QoL). Our study evaluates whether robotic-assisted ventral hernia repair (rVHR) diminish these complications compared to LVHR with primary closure of the defect (hybrid).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable pain
Started Sep 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 28, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 5, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 10, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 30, 2025
CompletedFebruary 10, 2022
January 1, 2022
4.1 years
January 5, 2022
February 9, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Robotic-assisted ventral hernia repair vs hybrid. Change in pain
VAS scale from 0 to 10. Zero in VAS is no pain and number ten is the highest possible pain
1-year
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Robotic-assisted ventral hernia repair vs hybrid. Change in the social functioning status.
1-year
Study Arms (2)
Robotic
EXPERIMENTALFifteen patients undergo rVHR operation.
hybrid
EXPERIMENTALFifteen patients undergo hybrid operation.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ventral hernia size 3-6 cm
You may not qualify if:
- previous ventral hernia
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Kuopio University Hospital
Kuopio, Northern Savonia, 70200, Finland
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Pirjo Käkelä, PhD
gi -surgeon, clinical teacher
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Pirjo Käkelä, PhD
gi-surgeon, clinical teacher
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- clinical teacher, MD, PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 5, 2022
First Posted
February 10, 2022
Study Start
September 28, 2021
Primary Completion
November 1, 2025
Study Completion
November 30, 2025
Last Updated
February 10, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share