Assessing the Histological Quality of Biopsy Samples Obtained With Multibite Forceps
Comparison of the Histological Quality of Endoscopic Biopsy Samples Obtained With Novel Multiple-bite Forceps Versus Conventional Double Bite Forceps
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Biopsies are routinely taken during endoscopy and colonoscopy in order to facilitate histological analysis of various disease processes. The current practice of obtaining biopsies involves taking a maximum of two biopsies at a single time (ie. with a single pass). When investigating certain diseases, such as celiac disease, there is a need to obtain several biopsies (sometimes greater than 6) and the current practice of taking one to two biopsies at a time can lengthen endoscopy time. This study investigates a new approved multiple bite forceps that has the ability to retrieve six biopsies during a single pass which could reduce endoscopy time and improve diagnostic yield. This study will assess the histological quality of multiple biopsies when taken with the multiple bite forceps compared to the standard double bite forceps. This multiple bite forcep is approved for clinical use in Canada.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 27, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 7, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 21, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 30, 2023
CompletedApril 3, 2024
April 1, 2024
8 months
January 27, 2022
April 2, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Histological quality
Comparison of the histological quality of specimens retrieved with multiple bite forceps compared to double bite forceps
Duration of endoscopy and pathological assessment of specimens
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Time duration
Duration of endoscopy
Study Arms (2)
Group A (double bite forceps)
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants in group A will proceed to have their biopsies during endoscopy taken with the conventional double bite forceps. Meaning, they will have two biopsies taken each time the forcep is passed through the endoscope. To obtain a total of six biopsies, the forceps will be passed through the endoscope a total of three times.
Group B (multiple bite forceps)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in group B will have their biopsies during endoscopy retrieved with the multiple bite forceps. Meaning, they will have six consecutive biopsies taken with each pass through the endoscope.
Interventions
Alligator style 2.4 mm diameter jaws that can hold up to six samples in one pass through endoscope.
Use of conventional double bite forceps that can store up to two specimens in one pass through endoscope
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients who were referred for outpatient upper endoscopy at Hotel Dieu Hospital requiring biopsies to investigate for celiac disease or H. Pylori infection.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with clinical or endoscopic evidence of gastric mucosal atrophy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hotel Dieu Hospital
Kingston, Ontario, K7L 5G2, Canada
Related Publications (5)
Lebwohl B, Kapel RC, Neugut AI, Green PH, Genta RM. Adherence to biopsy guidelines increases celiac disease diagnosis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Jul;74(1):103-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236. Epub 2011 May 20.
PMID: 21601201BACKGROUNDRostom A, Murray JA, Kagnoff MF. American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute technical review on the diagnosis and management of celiac disease. Gastroenterology. 2006 Dec;131(6):1981-2002. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.10.004. No abstract available.
PMID: 17087937BACKGROUNDRubio-Tapia A, Hill ID, Kelly CP, Calderwood AH, Murray JA; American College of Gastroenterology. ACG clinical guidelines: diagnosis and management of celiac disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 May;108(5):656-76; quiz 677. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.79. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
PMID: 23609613BACKGROUNDZaidman JS, Frederick WG, Furth EE, Su CG, Ginsberg GG. Comparison of Pelican single-use multibite biopsy forceps and traditional double-bite forceps: evaluation in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Oct;64(4):582-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.06.060.
PMID: 16996354BACKGROUNDFantin AC, Neuweiler J, Binek JS, Suter WR, Meyenberger C. Diagnostic quality of biopsy specimens: comparison between a conventional biopsy forceps and multibite forceps. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001 Nov;54(5):600-4. doi: 10.1067/mge.2001.118945.
PMID: 11677476RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lawrence C Hookey, MD
Queen's University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- The participant will be blinded as to which forceps (ie. conventional double bite or multiple bite forceps) are used for sampling during endoscopy. The pathologists assessing the histological quality of biopsy specimens will also be blinded to which forceps were used to obtain the samples.
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 27, 2022
First Posted
February 7, 2022
Study Start
May 1, 2022
Primary Completion
December 21, 2022
Study Completion
July 30, 2023
Last Updated
April 3, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share