Computational Neuroscience of Language Processing in the Human Brain
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Language is a signature human cognitive skill, but the precise computations that support language understanding remain unknown. This study aims to combine high-quality human neural data obtained through intracranial recordings with advances in computational modeling of human cognition to shed light on the construction and understanding of speech.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 2, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 24, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 3, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 31, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 31, 2026
CompletedJanuary 20, 2026
January 1, 2026
5 years
January 24, 2022
January 16, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Cortical maps of linguistic responses
By using sEEG intracranial recordings of the brain, EEG power in frequency bands will reflect cortical maps of responses to different linguistic manipulations, informing the functional organization of the human language system. Power is measured in arbitrary units; higher power reflects greater activity at the investigated frequency.
Throughout intracranial monitoring period, up to approximately 10 days
Neural time-courses during naturalistic language comprehension
Time-courses of neural response to language across diverse parts of the language network. These data will be used to predict across-time variation in response strength from the properties of linguistic input.
Throughout intracranial monitoring period, up to approximately 10 days
Brain scores for diverse artificial neural network (ANN) language models
Human neural data will be compared to ANN language models to test how well these models predict human responses to language and why. There are no minimum or maximum scores. Higher values mean better model predictivity (i.e., a better match between model representations and neural responses).
Throughout intracranial monitoring period, up to approximately 10 days
Study Arms (1)
Epileptic participants undergoing intracranial monitoring
OTHERPatients with pharmaco-resistant epilepsy undergoing intracranial monitoring involving the left cerebral hemisphere.
Interventions
Participants will listen to sentences and stories while neural data are recorded through electrodes placed for clinical purposes.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- clinical indications to proceed with intracranial monitoring involving the left cerebral hemisphere, as determined by a multidisciplinary epilepsy surgery team
- the ability to comply with test directions and provide informed consent
- between ages 18 - 85
You may not qualify if:
- inability to understand or perform the task outlined in the protocol, or who are unwilling or unable to participate
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
Related Publications (14)
Blank I, Balewski Z, Mahowald K, Fedorenko E. Syntactic processing is distributed across the language system. Neuroimage. 2016 Feb 15;127:307-323. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.069. Epub 2015 Dec 5.
PMID: 26666896BACKGROUNDBlank IA, Fedorenko E. No evidence for differences among language regions in their temporal receptive windows. Neuroimage. 2020 Oct 1;219:116925. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116925. Epub 2020 May 11.
PMID: 32407994BACKGROUNDFedorenko E, Behr MK, Kanwisher N. Functional specificity for high-level linguistic processing in the human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Sep 27;108(39):16428-33. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1112937108. Epub 2011 Sep 1.
PMID: 21885736BACKGROUNDFedorenko E, Blank IA. Broca's Area Is Not a Natural Kind. Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Apr;24(4):270-284. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.01.001. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
PMID: 32160565BACKGROUNDFedorenko E, Duncan J, Kanwisher N. Language-selective and domain-general regions lie side by side within Broca's area. Curr Biol. 2012 Nov 6;22(21):2059-62. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.09.011. Epub 2012 Oct 11.
PMID: 23063434BACKGROUNDFedorenko E, Hsieh PJ, Nieto-Castanon A, Whitfield-Gabrieli S, Kanwisher N. New method for fMRI investigations of language: defining ROIs functionally in individual subjects. J Neurophysiol. 2010 Aug;104(2):1177-94. doi: 10.1152/jn.00032.2010. Epub 2010 Apr 21.
PMID: 20410363BACKGROUNDFedorenko E, Nieto-Castanon A, Kanwisher N. Lexical and syntactic representations in the brain: an fMRI investigation with multi-voxel pattern analyses. Neuropsychologia. 2012 Mar;50(4):499-513. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.014. Epub 2011 Sep 17.
PMID: 21945850BACKGROUNDFedorenko E, Scott TL, Brunner P, Coon WG, Pritchett B, Schalk G, Kanwisher N. Neural correlate of the construction of sentence meaning. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Oct 11;113(41):E6256-E6262. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1612132113. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
PMID: 27671642BACKGROUNDMollica F, Siegelman M, Diachek E, Piantadosi ST, Mineroff Z, Futrell R, Kean H, Qian P, Fedorenko E. Composition is the Core Driver of the Language-selective Network. Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2020 Mar 1;1(1):104-134. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00005. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 36794007BACKGROUNDNieto-Castanon A, Fedorenko E. Subject-specific functional localizers increase sensitivity and functional resolution of multi-subject analyses. Neuroimage. 2012 Nov 15;63(3):1646-69. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.065. Epub 2012 Jul 8.
PMID: 22784644BACKGROUNDNorman-Haignere S, Kanwisher NG, McDermott JH. Distinct Cortical Pathways for Music and Speech Revealed by Hypothesis-Free Voxel Decomposition. Neuron. 2015 Dec 16;88(6):1281-1296. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.11.035.
PMID: 26687225BACKGROUNDPereira F, Lou B, Pritchett B, Ritter S, Gershman SJ, Kanwisher N, Botvinick M, Fedorenko E. Toward a universal decoder of linguistic meaning from brain activation. Nat Commun. 2018 Mar 6;9(1):963. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03068-4.
PMID: 29511192BACKGROUNDShain C, Blank IA, van Schijndel M, Schuler W, Fedorenko E. fMRI reveals language-specific predictive coding during naturalistic sentence comprehension. Neuropsychologia. 2020 Feb 17;138:107307. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107307. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
PMID: 31874149BACKGROUNDSiegelman M, Blank IA, Mineroff Z, Fedorenko E. An Attempt to Conceptually Replicate the Dissociation between Syntax and Semantics during Sentence Comprehension. Neuroscience. 2019 Aug 10;413:219-229. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.06.003. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
PMID: 31200104BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director, Functional Neurosurgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 24, 2022
First Posted
February 3, 2022
Study Start
April 2, 2021
Primary Completion
March 31, 2026
Study Completion
March 31, 2026
Last Updated
January 20, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share