Digital Marking Systems
Comparing Two Digital Marking Systems
1 other identifier
interventional
15
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Comparison of the alignment axis of the Alcon Verion and the Zeiss Callisto alignment systems intraoperatively
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2021
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 21, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 2, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2024
CompletedFebruary 2, 2022
January 1, 2022
2 years
January 21, 2022
January 21, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Alignment axis
Difference in aligment axis will be assessed with the Verion and the Callisto digital marking system
24 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Loss of Tracking
24 months
Luminance
24 months
Study Arms (1)
Verion and Callisto
EXPERIMENTALAlignment axis will be analysed with both, the Verion and the Callisto, digital marking system in the same eye of the same patient
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age-related cataract and scheduled for cataract surgery
- age 21 or older
- written informed consent prior to surgery
You may not qualify if:
- dense cataract or corneal pathology that would significantly influence the measurements
- previous ocular surgery, ocular inflammation, or ocular trauma
- nystagmus or pathologies that might affect patient's fixation
- pregnancy
- corneal astigmatism \> 1.5 dpt. or need for a toric IOL
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery (VIROS), Hanusch Hospital
Vienna, 1140, Austria
Related Publications (1)
Zeilinger J, Schlatter A, Ruiss M, Bayer N, Kronschlager M, Findl O. Comparison of two digital alignment systems for toric intraocular lens implantation. BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2024 Sep 16;9(1):e001875. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001875.
PMID: 39284678DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Oliver Findl, MD
Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 21, 2022
First Posted
February 2, 2022
Study Start
July 1, 2021
Primary Completion
July 1, 2023
Study Completion
July 1, 2024
Last Updated
February 2, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share