LIVIA 2.0 : A RCT Of Two French Internet Intervention For Adults Struggling With Prolonged Grief Symptoms
LIVIA 2.0: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Two French Internet Intervention for Adults Struggling With Prolonged Grief Symptoms After the Loss of a Close One (by Bereavement or Separation/Divorce)
1 other identifier
interventional
64
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The investigators aim to compare the efficacy of an IBI targeting complicated grief symptoms (LIVIA 2.0) compared to an already investigated IBI (LIVIA 1) using a guidance on demand design in a randomised controlled trial (RCT). More specifically, the investigators will test the following primary hypotheses:
- Both interventions will significantly increase participants' well-being and decrease their distress, and those changes will be stable until follow-up.
- LIVIA 2.0 will be more efficient than LIVIA 1 on all measure outcomes.
- LIVIA 2.0 will have less dropouts than LIVIA 1.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 23, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 2, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 6, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 31, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 10, 2023
CompletedSeptember 8, 2023
September 1, 2023
9 months
December 23, 2021
September 7, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change in complicated grief symptoms
assessed with a French version (Cherblanc \& Zech, 2021) of The Traumatic Grief Inventory (Boelen et al., 2019), on a scale ranging from 1 = never to 5 = always. The mean score is used as a final score. Higher score represent a higher symptom load.
Pretest; 12-week post-test; 3-month Follow-up
Change in depression symptoms
assessed with the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (Kroenke \& Spitzer, 2002; Kroenke, Spitzer \& Williams, 2001), on a scale ranging from 0 = never to 4 = practically every day. The sum of the scores is used as a final score. Higher score represent a higher symptom load.
Pretest; 12-week post-test; 3-month Follow-up
Change in well-being
measured with the French version (Villieux et al., 2016) of the Flourishing Scale (Diener et al., 2010), on a scale ranging from 1 = I completely disagree, to 7 = I completely agree. The mean score is used as a final score. Higher score represent a better psychological well-being.
Pretest; 12-week post-test; 3-month Follow-up
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Change in anxiety symptoms
Pretest; 12-week post-test; 3-month Follow-up
Change in grief coping strategies
Pretest; 12-week post-test; 3-month Follow-up
Change in aspects related to identity
Pretest; 12-week post-test; 3-month Follow-up
Satisfaction with the program (utility, clarity, impact, etc.) assessed by an adapted version of the CSQ-I
12-week post-test
Change in the monitoring of the mood, solitude feelings and grief symptoms
Days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 43, 50, 57, 64, 71, 78, 85
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
LIVIA 1
ACTIVE COMPARATORLIVIA 1 is a 12-week intervention composed of 10 sessions, whereby we recommend completing one session per week. It includes psychoeducational content and exercises that are based on empirically validated intervention tools, mainly issued from Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy.
LIVIA 2.0
EXPERIMENTALLIVIA 2.0 is a 12-week intervention composed of 10 sessions, whereby we recommend completing one session per week. It includes psychoeducational content and exercises that are based on empirically validated intervention tools, mainly issued from Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy but also from positive psychology and cognitive psychopathology frame.
Interventions
The study aim to compare the efficacy of an IBI targeting complicated grief symptoms (LIVIA 2.0) compared to an already investigated IBI (LIVIA 1) using a guidance on demand design in a randomised controlled trial. Both programs are composed of 10 weekly sessions proposing educational material, questionnaires and exercises. They are based on current scientific theories of grief but present their content differently. Compared to LIVIA 1, LIVIA 2.0 is less based on academic readings and participants can choose more freely which topics and exercises they want to do. LIVIA 2.0 also offers a system of reminder messages to maximize adherence as well as more elaborate automated guidance.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Bereavement or separation/divorce
- Either of these events should have happened more than 6 months before participating in the study
- Feeling the need for support to cope with the loss (a diagnosis of complicated grief is not necessary)
- Age: 18 years or older
- Regular Internet access
- Mastery of the French language - Approved ICF
You may not qualify if:
- Moderate to acute current suicidality (SIDAS \> 19)
- Severe psychological or somatic disorders which need immediate treatment.
- Concomitant psychotherapy
- Prescription or change in dosage of psychoactive drugs in the month prior or during the self-help intervention.
- Inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g. due to comprehension problems
- Enrolment of the investigator, his/her family members, employees, and other dependent persons.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Debrot Aniklead
Study Sites (1)
University of Lausanne - Institute of Psychology
Lausanne, Canton of Vaud, 1015, Switzerland
Related Publications (2)
Debrot A, Efinger L, Kheyar M, Pomini V, Berthoud L. A French-Language Web-Based Intervention Targeting Prolonged Grief Symptoms in People Who Are Bereaved and Separated: Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Form Res. 2024 Oct 16;8:e57294. doi: 10.2196/57294.
PMID: 39412869DERIVEDDebrot A, Kheyar M, Efinger L, Berthoud L, Pomini V. Supporting People Who Have Lost a Close Person by Bereavement or Separation: Protocol of a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Two French-Language Internet-Based Interventions. JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Jun 23;11(6):e39026. doi: 10.2196/39026.
PMID: 35737454DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Valentino Pomini
University of Lausanne
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Sponsor-Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 23, 2021
First Posted
February 2, 2022
Study Start
May 6, 2022
Primary Completion
January 31, 2023
Study Completion
August 10, 2023
Last Updated
September 8, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Access Criteria
- The investigators demand that the purpose of the request is clearly stated.
After publishing the results, the investigators will make the codified data available on request.