NCT05218447

Brief Summary

The DOOR SCI project examines dosing effects of robotic gait training (RGT) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) initiated during inpatient rehabilitation and continued through early outpatient rehabilitation

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
144

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2022

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 20, 2021

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 1, 2022

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 20, 2022

Completed
3.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 14, 2025

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 14, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

February 6, 2025

Status Verified

September 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

3.1 years

First QC Date

December 20, 2021

Last Update Submit

February 4, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

ExoskeletonWearable assistive technologyTranscranial magnetic stimulationRobotic gait training

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury - II (WISCI-II) from baseline

    The WISCI-II defines the physical limitation for gait secondary to impairment at the person level and indicates the ability of a person to walk after SCI. The WISC-II rank orders the ability a person to walk on a scale of 0-20 with 0 representing no ability to stand or participate in assisted walking and 20 representing an ability to walk 10 meters with no devices, no braces, and no physical assistance.

    Change in baseline, within 5 days of discharge, within 5 days post-intervention (RGT Groups) or 1-month post-discharge (UC group), 1-month post-intervention or 2-months post-discharge (UC group) (5) 9-months post-SCI onset

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Change in 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT)

    Change in baseline, within 5 days of discharge, within 5 days post-intervention (RGT Groups) or 1-month post-discharge (UC group), 1-month post-intervention or 2-months post-discharge (UC group) (5) 9-months post-SCI onset

  • Change in Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM)

    Change in baseline, within 5 days of discharge, within 5 days post-intervention (RGT Groups) or 1-month post-discharge (UC group), 1-month post-intervention or 2-months post-discharge (UC group) (5) 9-months post-SCI onset

  • Change in Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)

    Change in baseline, within 5 days of discharge, within 5 days post-intervention (RGT Groups) or 1-month post-discharge (UC group), 1-month post-intervention or 2-months post-discharge (UC group) (5) 9-months post-SCI onset

  • Change in Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)

    Change in baseline, within 5 days of discharge, within 5 days post-intervention (RGT Groups) or 1-month post-discharge (UC group), 1-month post-intervention or 2-months post-discharge (UC group) (5) 9-months post-SCI onset

  • Change in Penn Spasm Frequency Scale (PSFS)

    Change in baseline, within 5 days of discharge, within 5 days post-intervention (RGT Groups) or 1-month post-discharge (UC group), 1-month post-intervention or 2-months post-discharge (UC group) (5) 9-months post-SCI onset

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (3)

  • Rate of adverse events

    Through study completion, an average of 9 months

  • Self-reported tolerance of treatment

    Through study completion, an average of 9 months

  • Rate of treatment completion

    Through study completion, an average of 9 months

Study Arms (4)

Low Frequency

EXPERIMENTAL

Subjects will receive 2 sessions of robotic gait training (RGT) per week for 12 weeks

Device: Robotic Gait Training

Moderate Frequency

EXPERIMENTAL

Subjects will receive 3 sessions of robotic gait training (RGT) per week for 8 weeks

Device: Robotic Gait Training

High Frequency

EXPERIMENTAL

Subjects will receive 4 sessions of robotic gait training (RGT) per week for 6 weeks

Device: Robotic Gait Training

Control Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Subjects will receive usual care gait training without robotic gait training

Other: Usual Care (UC) Gait Training

Interventions

Subjects will be randomized to one of 4 gait training group. The duration of treatment will span across their inpatient rehabilitation length of stay after providing informed consent to their 9 months post-SCI visit in the outpatient rehabilitation setting. Subjects will wear an exoskeleton device and receive robotic gait training (RGT) with a physical therapist during a 45-minutes inpatient rehabilitation session. Subjects will complete 24 robotic gait training sessions over different durations during outpatient rehabilitation. Subjects will also complete a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) assessment and questionnaires about walking and function. Subjects will be asked to wear an activity monitor to measure their activity.

Also known as: Ekso GT™ robotic exoskeleton
High FrequencyLow FrequencyModerate Frequency

Subjects will be randomized to one of 4 gait training group. The duration of treatment will span across their inpatient rehabilitation length of stay after providing informed consent to their 9 months post-SCI visit in the outpatient rehabilitation setting. Subjects will complete gait training with a physical therapist during a 45-minutes inpatient rehabilitation session. Subjects will also complete a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) assessment and questionnaires about walking and function. Subjects will be asked to wear an activity monitor to measure their activity.

Control Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age16 Years - 85 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • All types of motor incomplete SCI (traumatic and non-traumatic)
  • Acute/Subacute phase of recovery
  • Medically stable as deemed by physician
  • Undergoing medical care and rehabilitation at Baylor Scott \& White Institute for Rehabilitation
  • Both genders and all races and ethnicities
  • Meet the Ekso robotic exoskeleton frame limitations
  • Continence of or a program for bladder and bowel management

You may not qualify if:

  • Concurrent moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI)
  • Degenerative diagnoses
  • Pre-morbid developmental disability, significant psychological diagnosis, or other cognitive impairment
  • Pregnancy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Baylor Scott & White Institute for Rehabilitation

Dallas, Texas, 75246, United States

RECRUITING

Related Publications (5)

  • Swank C, Trammell M, Bennett M, Ochoa C, Callender L, Sikka S, Driver S. The utilization of an overground robotic exoskeleton for gait training during inpatient rehabilitation-single-center retrospective findings. Int J Rehabil Res. 2020 Sep;43(3):206-213. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000409.

    PMID: 32282573BACKGROUND
  • Swank C, Sikka S, Driver S, Bennett M, Callender L. Feasibility of integrating robotic exoskeleton gait training in inpatient rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020 May;15(4):409-417. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2019.1587014. Epub 2019 Mar 19.

    PMID: 30887864BACKGROUND
  • DiPasquale J, Trammell M, Clark K, Fowler H, Callender L, Bennett M, Swank C. Intensity of usual care physical therapy during inpatient rehabilitation for people with neurologic diagnoses. PM R. 2022 Jan;14(1):46-57. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12577. Epub 2021 Apr 15.

    PMID: 33599119BACKGROUND
  • Swank C, Galvan C, DiPasquale J, Callender L, Sikka S, & Driver D. Lessons Learned with Robotic Exoskeleton Use During Rehabilitation - therapeutic and medical severity considerations. Technology & Disability. 2020; 32(2): 103-110.

    BACKGROUND
  • Suhalka A, da Silva Areas FZ, Meza F, Ochoa C, Driver S, Sikka S, Hamilton R, Goh HT, Callender L, Bennett M, Shih HT, Swank C. Dosing overground robotic gait training after spinal cord injury: a randomized clinical trial protocol. Trials. 2024 Oct 18;25(1):690. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08503-0.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Spinal Cord Injuries

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Spinal Cord DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesTrauma, Nervous SystemWounds and Injuries

Study Officials

  • Chad Swank, PhD, PT, NCS

    Baylor Research Institute

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Christa Ochoa, MPH

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
All clinical and study specific assessments will be completed by trained assessors blinded to group allocation. Clinical assessments will be completed by a physical therapist (e.g., WISCI-II, SCIM). Study specific assessments (e.g., FSS, actigraphy, TMS) will be conducted by study staff and investigator. Subjects will not be blinded to group allocation.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Subjects will be randomly assigned into one of 4 gait training groups: usual care (UC) gait training only; high frequency RGT - 4 sessions/week for 6 weeks; moderate frequency RGT - 3 sessions/week for 8 weeks; or low frequency RGT - 2 sessions/week for 12 weeks
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Research Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 20, 2021

First Posted

February 1, 2022

Study Start

May 20, 2022

Primary Completion

June 14, 2025

Study Completion

September 14, 2025

Last Updated

February 6, 2025

Record last verified: 2024-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations