Evaluation of the Close to Home Program in California
3 other identifiers
interventional
1,000
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Investigators propose to rigorously evaluate the Close to Home (C2H) model via a cluster-matched control trial across 18 diverse communities (9 C2H, 9 control) in California via collection and analyses of social network, school-based and social media data. Close to Home is a primary prevention community mobilization model implemented in 10 communities across California that engages community members across multiple sectors and social networks to strengthen community connections and shift social norms regarding sexual violence (SV), but has never been rigorously evaluated. C2H moves beyond criminal justice, lobbying, or school-based curricular approaches, taking a true community-level and community-led approach. This is a five-year project, funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for 3 years with competitive awards for years 4 and 5, and is conducted in partnership with the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) and ValorUs (formerly CALCASA). The University of California, San Diego (UCSD) and CDPH partnership is uniquely poised to conduct the first rigorous evaluation of C2H in California at this time.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 4, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 3, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 25, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2025
CompletedOctober 3, 2025
September 1, 2025
4 years
December 3, 2021
September 29, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Virtual/Online Sexual Harassment - Digital Dating Abuse Scale
Two item measure sexual harassment victimization and six items measure perpetration online, over text, or through social media. Response options: yes, in the last 12 months; yes, prior to last 12 months; never. Items used are adapted from the Digital Dating Abuse Scale - Reed, L. A., Tolman, R. M., \& Ward, L. M. (2017). Gender matters: Experiences and consequences of digital dating abuse victimization in adolescent dating relationships. Journal of adolescence, 59, 79-89.
2 years
In-Person Sexual Harassment & Violence - Sexual Harassment & Violence Scale
One item measures in-person sexual harassment victimization and three items measure perpetration. Response options: yes, in the last 12 months; yes, prior to last 12 months; never. Items were adapted from Mitchell, K. J., Ybarra, M. L., \& Korchmaros, J. D. (2014). Sexual harassment among adolescents of different sexual orientations and gender identities. Child abuse \& neglect, 38(2), 280-295 and Miller, E., Jones, K. A., Ripper, L., Paglisotti, T., Mulbah, P., \& Abebe, K. Z. (2020). An athletic coach-delivered middle school gender violence prevention program: A cluster randomized clinical trial. JAMA pediatrics, 174(3), 241-249.
2 years
Dating Violence Victimization- Coaching Boys into Men Modified Dating Violence Victimization/Perpetration Scale
Two items measure dating violence victimization. Response options: yes, in the last 12 months; yes, prior to last 12 months; never. Items were adapted from Miller, E., Jones, K. A., Ripper, L., Paglisotti, T., Mulbah, P., \& Abebe, K. Z. (2020). An athletic coach-delivered middle school gender violence prevention program: A cluster randomized clinical trial. JAMA pediatrics, 174(3), 241-249.
2 years
Dating Violence Perpetration- Coaching Boys into Men Modified Dating Violence Victimization/Perpetration Scale
Four items measure perpetration. Response options: yes, in the last 12 months; yes, prior to last 12 months; never. Items were adapted from Miller, E., Jones, K. A., Ripper, L., Paglisotti, T., Mulbah, P., \& Abebe, K. Z. (2020). An athletic coach-delivered middle school gender violence prevention program: A cluster randomized clinical trial. JAMA pediatrics, 174(3), 241-249.
2 years
Sexual Violence Victimization/Perpetration - Coaching Boys into Men Modified Perpetration Scale
One item measures in-person sexual violence victimization and twp items measure perpetration. Response options: yes, in the last 12 months; yes, prior to last 12 months; never. Items were adapted from Miller, E., Jones, K. A., Ripper, L., Paglisotti, T., Mulbah, P., \& Abebe, K. Z. (2020). An athletic coach-delivered middle school gender violence prevention program: A cluster randomized clinical trial. JAMA pediatrics, 174(3), 241-249.
2 years
LGBTQ+ and Gender Minority Violence- Victimization Scale
Nine items measure specific forms of sexual violence and harassment victimization experienced by sexual and gender minority youth. Response options: yes, in the last 12 months; yes, prior to last 12 months; never. Items adapted from Peitzmeier SM, Wirtz AL, Humes E. et al. The transgender-specific intimate partner violence scale for research and practice: Validation in a sample of transgender women. Social Science \& Medicine. 2021. 291: 114495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114495 and Scheer J, Woulfe JM, Goodman LA. Psychometric validation of the identity abuse scale among LGBTQ individuals. Community Psychology. 2018.
2 years
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Social Norms- Sexual Violence Social Norms Scale
2 years
Social Norms- Shared Concern about Sexual and Dating Violence Scale
2 years
Social Cohesion Scale
2 years
Community Connectedness Scale
2 years
Sense of Belonging Scale
2 years
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Close to Home Intervention
EXPERIMENTALSites receiving the intervention arm were determined prior to the initiation of the research. The rape crisis center in each community applied for funding from the California Department of Public Health to implement the Close to Home model in their community and they were accepted via a competitive application process. Close to Home (C2H) is a community mobilization model developed in Boston and adapted for California and is specifically designed to prevent SV by strengthening community social connections and engaging whole communities in dialogue and action to transform social norms.
Control Program
NO INTERVENTIONThe control program is the 4-H Youth Development Program, which is implemented across every county in California via the University of California Cooperative Extension. In 4-H programs, kids and teens complete hands-on projects in areas like health, science, agriculture and civic engagement in a positive environment where they receive guidance from adult mentors and are encouraged to take on proactive leadership roles. The model does not use community mobilization and does not address sexual violence. Control communities were selected based on propensity score matching using sociodemographic and community-level variables related to risk for sexual violence. The closest match was recruited first, and a next-best match was used if the first match declined participation.
Interventions
Close to Home (C2H), a community mobilization model developed in Boston and adapted for California, is specifically designed to prevent SV by strengthening community social connections and engaging whole communities in dialogue and action to transform social norms. The C2H model guides communities through four phases: 1) Assess, 2) Talk, 3) Build, and 4) Act. C2H mobilizes diverse groups of people residing in a shared geography and linked by social and political ties to engage in joint actions for SV prevention
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Must be between 14-24 years old
- Must be enrolled in program with partner organization(s) or have been nominated by a peer enrolled in the partner programs
- Provide informed consent to participate
You may not qualify if:
- Under age 14
- Over age 24
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Dr. Jay Silverman
San Diego, California, 92093, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jay G Silverman, PhD
Tulane Center on Community-Engaged GBV Research
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Global Public Health
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 3, 2021
First Posted
January 25, 2022
Study Start
October 4, 2021
Primary Completion
September 30, 2025
Study Completion
September 30, 2025
Last Updated
October 3, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share