NCT05199792

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) using gadoterate meglumine to clinically obtained MRA using gadobutrol. The specific aims are to show:

  1. 1.Carotid, chest, and abdomenal MRA with gadoterate meglumine has a comparable image quality and diagnostic confidence to MRA using gadobutrol.
  2. 2.Carotid, chest, and abdomenal MRA with gadoterate meglumine has a comparable accuracy for vascular lesion and stenosis detection compared to MRA using gadobutrol.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
65

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2017

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 2, 2017

Completed
2.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2019

Completed
1 day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2020

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 8, 2021

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 20, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

January 20, 2022

Status Verified

January 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

2.6 years

First QC Date

December 8, 2021

Last Update Submit

January 19, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Assessment of MRA image quality

    assess the image quality of MRA studies acquired using these two contrast

    18 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Assessment of MRA accuracy

    18 months

Study Arms (1)

2x dose of Dotarem

qualifying MRA

Diagnostic Test: Dotarem

Interventions

DotaremDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

(Dotarem) (0.4 ml/kg (0.2 mmol/kg))

2x dose of Dotarem

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 89 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

qualifying MRA

You may qualify if:

  • Male or female subjects 18-89 years of age
  • Suspected or diagnosed vascular disease
  • Standard of care carotid, chest, or
  • Willingness to undergo 1 research MRA with up to double dose gadoterate meglumine
  • Able to complete the MR safety questionnaire
  • Able to comprehend and provide informed consent in English

You may not qualify if:

  • Allergy to gadolinium-containing contrast media
  • Chronic, severe kidney disease
  • eGFR \< 60mL/min/1.73m2
  • Acute kidney injury
  • Kidney or liver transplant within 8 weeks
  • Contraindication to MRI (implanted device, claustrophobia, dyspnea precluding the ability to follow breath-hold instructions)
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Adults unable to consent
  • Individual who are not yet adults
  • Prisoners

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Yasmeen Khan

Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Eng J. Sample size estimation: how many individuals should be studied? Radiology. 2003 May;227(2):309-13. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2272012051.

    PMID: 12732691BACKGROUND
  • Seeger A, Kramer U, Fenchel M, Grimm F, Bretschneider C, Doring J, Klumpp B, Tepe G, Rittig K, Seidensticker PR, Claussen CD, Miller S. Comparison between a linear versus a macrocyclic contrast agent for whole body MR angiography in a clinical routine setting. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2008 Dec 30;10(1):63. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-10-63.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Vascular Diseases

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cardiovascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • James Carr

    Northwestern University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 8, 2021

First Posted

January 20, 2022

Study Start

June 2, 2017

Primary Completion

December 31, 2019

Study Completion

January 1, 2020

Last Updated

January 20, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations