Different Treatment Modalities for Atrophied Distal Extension Maxillary Ridges
Comparison Between Three Different Treatment Modalities for Atrophied Distal Extension Maxillary Ridges Clinical and Radiographic Study
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will compare clinical and radiographic outcomes of three different treatment modalities for atrophied distal extension maxillary ridges these modalities include
- 1.Implant retained distal extension RPD
- 2.Sinus lift and long implant and screw-retained prosthesis
- 3.Short implant and screw-retained prosthesis
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2020
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 24, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 20, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2022
CompletedMarch 2, 2022
September 1, 2021
1.2 years
September 24, 2021
February 27, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Plaque index
measuring plaque accumulation around implants using scores
one year
Gingival index
measuring gingival inflammation around implants using scores
one year
Probing depth
measuring peri-implant probing depth in mm
one year
implant stability
measuring the mobility of the implants using resonance frequency analysis Implant stability quotient)
one year
Marginal bone loss
measuring crestal bone loss around implants in mm
one year
Patient satisfaction using VAS questionnaire (visual analogue scale)
Regarding VAS, participants were asked to score their answer according to the amount of satisfaction on a 100mm line (Score zero = no satisfaction at all and score 100 = complete satisfaction). The questions cover several items related to prosthesis such as: retention, stability, comfort, ease of cleaning, ease of speaking, ease of chewing, limited activities due to embarrassment, quality of bolus and appearance.
one year
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Prosthetic Aspects
one year
Muscle activity
one year
maximum bite force
one year
Study Arms (3)
overdentures
ACTIVE COMPARATORimplant overdentures
sinus lift
ACTIVE COMPARATORsinus lift and long implants and screw-retained prosthesis
short implants
ACTIVE COMPARATORshort implants and screw-retained prosthesis
Interventions
insertion of long implants anterior to the maxillary sinus to retain partial overdentures
performing sinus lift surgical procedure with simultaneous placement of long implants to support screw-retained prosthesis
placement of short implants in the remaining bone above maxillary sinus to support screw-retained prosthesis without performing sinus lift
Distal extension metallic partial dentures retained by attachments to the implants
porcelain fused to metal fixed screw-retained prosthesis supported by long implants
porcelain fused to metal fixed screw-retained prosthesis supported by short implants
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The patients will be selected according to the following:
- They have distal extension maxillary ridge with sinus pneumatization and remaining alveolar bone height 6- 8mm as verified by preoperative CBCT, have no previous denture experience. They are healthy, free from any systemic diseases relating to the bone resorption (diabetes - hyperparathyroidism). This can be achieved through medical history and clinical examination by a physician and laboratory investigations.
- Posterior maxillary alveolar ridge deficient in height, width and covered with healthy firm mucosa.
- Patients are less satisfied with conventional RPD.
- Absence of maxillary sinus diseases.
You may not qualify if:
- Acute or chronic sinus pathology
- History of a sinus augmentation in the past in the relevant sinus
- Poor dental hygiene. Smoker.
- Compromised general health (uncontrolled diabetes, bleeding disorder
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University
Al Mansurah, Eldakahlia, 35516, Egypt
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 24, 2021
First Posted
January 20, 2022
Study Start
March 1, 2020
Primary Completion
May 1, 2021
Study Completion
June 1, 2022
Last Updated
March 2, 2022
Record last verified: 2021-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL