NCT05198232

Brief Summary

There are critical knowledge gaps that need to be addressed to understand the impact of aerobic exercise programs on relevant functional outcomes in adults with developmental disabilities (DD). This study will build upon previous literature by examining the impact of a 10-week (2x a week; 60-minutes per session) virtual adapted aerobic dance intervention (adapted Zumba®) in adults with DD ages 20-69 (n=58). Participants will be quasi-randomized to one of three groups: control (normal activities), low-tempo Zumba®, and high-tempo Zumba®. The quasi-randomization enables the investigators to ensure similarities in relevant demographic factors (e.g., disability type, age, sex) across the three groups. This design will enable the investigators to determine the effects of Zumba® and the impact of tempo level on relevant outcome measures. Participants will compete testing three times - pre-test, post-test, and a 4-week follow-up test - to determine the immediate and long-term benefits of Zumba®. Changes in functional mobility (Timed Up-And-Go), balance (Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction on Balance), aerobic capacity (6-minute Walk Test), and executive functioning (Flanker) will be assessed. During the program, participants' moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) will be measured using accelerometry. Compared to the control group, the investigators hypothesize that both Zumba groups will show an improvement in body composition, balance, functional mobility, executive functioning, aerobic capacity, and MVPA during the program. Moreover, the investigators hypothesize that the high tempo group will improve body composition, balance, functional mobility, executive functioning, aerobic capacity, and MVPA during the program more than the low tempo.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
57

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2021

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 26, 2021

Completed
10 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 11, 2021

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 20, 2022

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 30, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 30, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

May 5, 2022

Status Verified

May 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

November 11, 2021

Last Update Submit

May 4, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Adaptive ExerciseVirtual ExerciseExecutive FunctioningDance

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Change in Cardiorespiratory functioning using the 6-minute Walk Test (6MWT)

    The 6MWT is a submaximal exercise test to assess cardiorespiratory functioning. The test includes measures of pre-and post-walk blood pressure, heart rate, blood oxygen levels, and fatigue (Borg Scale). The test consists of walking back and forth between two cones set up at a distance of 15-meters for 6 minutes continuously. The total distance walked in meters is recorded for a single trial. This test is valid for individuals ages 16-80, shows good test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.95), and has been used with adults with DD ages 20-80.

    Pre-test 1 week prior to intervention, Post-test 1 week after the intervention, Follow-up 4 weeks after the intervention (for the Zumba groups only)

  • Change in Functional Mobility using the Timed-Up and Go (TUG).

    TUG is a measure of functional mobility. The test consists of the participant sitting in a chair (with no arms), rising from the chair, walking 3 meters to a cone, turning around, walking back to the chair, and sitting in the chair. The total time to complete each trial is recorded. Participants complete a total of three trials - one practice trial and two formal trials that are averaged. This test is valid for individuals ages 16-70, shows good test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.92), and has been used with adults with DD ages 20-80.

    Pre-test 1 week prior to intervention, Post-test 1 week after the intervention, Follow-up 4 weeks after the post-test (for the Zumba groups only)

  • Change in Static Balance using the Biodex Balance SD - modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction on Balance.

    The Biodex Balance SD measures the center of pressure while the participant stands on the platform during balance tasks. For the purpose of the present proposal, the modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction on Balance will be used. This test has been used with adults with developmental disabilities. For this test, the participant stands barefoot with the feet hip-distance apart. Postural sway is measured during each of four conditions (20 seconds per condition): eyes open standing on a firm surface, eyes closed standing on a firm surface, eyes open standing on a foam surface, and eyes closed standing on a foam surface. A sway score is computed based on the sway amplitude.

    Pre-test 1 week prior to intervention, Post-test 1 week after the intervention, Follow-up 4 weeks after the post test (for the Zumba groups only)

  • Change in Attention/Inhibition using the NIH Toolbox Flanker Test.

    The Flanker test is a measure of selective attention and inhibition. It is conducted on an iPad. For each trial, the direction of a central arrow will change such that the central arrow will be either congruent or incongruent with flanking arrows (e.g., \< \< \> \< \< or \< \< \< \< \<). The participant will select the direction of the central arrow by touching the corresponding left or right arrow on the iPad below the stimuli. The participant completes 6 practice trials and a total of 20 formal trials. The raw score is converted to an uncorrected standard score (mean = 100, sd = 15). The NIH Toolbox Flanker Test has been normed based on a sample of typically developing children and adults ages 3-85 and has been used with adults with developmental disabilities . The test shows good test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.80).

    Pre-test 1 week prior to intervention, Post-test 1 week after the intervention, Follow-up 4 weeks after the post-test (for the Zumba groups only)

  • Change in Physical activity levels

    Wrist-worn triaxial accelerometer (ActiGraph GT3X, Pensacola, Florida) will be used to measure physical activity levels (i.e., light, moderate, vigorous, very vigorous physical activity) during each adapted Zumba® session. The wear time validation algorithm is Choi, which automatically classifies "non-wear time" for 90 minutes of consecutive zero/nonzero counts. The Freedson cut-points will be used for scoring PA into the following categories: light (0-2689 counts per 60 second), moderate (2690-6166 counts per 60 second), vigorous (6167-9642 counts per 60 second), and very vigorous (\>9643 counts per 60 second). The wear time validation and cut-points have been used to evaluate PA in adults with disabilities ages 23-72.

    Throughout all 20 intervention days.

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Change in Body mass index

    Pre-test 1 week prior to intervention, Post-test 1 week after the intervention, Follow-up 4 weeks after the post-test (for the Zumba groups only)

  • Change in Weight

    Pre-test 1 week prior to intervention, Post-test 1 week after the intervention, Follow-up 4 weeks after the post-test (for the Zumba groups only)

  • Change in Body fat percentage

    Pre-test 1 week prior to intervention, Post-test 1 week after the intervention, Follow-up 4 weeks after the post-test (for the Zumba groups only)

  • Change in Body Fat Mass

    Pre-test 1 week prior to intervention, Post-test 1 week after the intervention, Follow-up 4 weeks after the post-test (for the Zumba groups only)

  • Change in Fat free mass

    Pre-test 1 week prior to intervention, Post-test 1 week after the intervention, Follow-up 4 weeks after the post-test (for the Zumba groups only)

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Control Group

NO INTERVENTION

This group will complete normal daily activities. The participants will complete pre-test, 10 weeks of normal daily activities, and post-test. No changes to their daily schedule will be made by the researcher, the control group will participate in normal activities as part of their community day program.

Zumba High Tempo

EXPERIMENTAL

The Zumba high tempo group will complete a 10-week (2x a week; 60 minutes per session) virtual adapted aerobic dance intervention (adapted Zumba®). Each session will consist of: a warm-up (3-5 minutes), 5-6 songs with instruction (40 minutes), and a cool down (5 minutes) for a total of about 60 minutes including rest/water breaks and time to transition. The only difference between the two adapted Zumba® programs will be the speed at which the songs will be played and the number of times through each song. The songs for the high-tempo group will be played at full speed; the songs in the high-tempo group will be repeated to ensure an equal amount of time moving for both groups. All sessions will be video recorded and examined for fidelity. This group will complete pre-test, post-test, and a 4-week follow-up.

Behavioral: Zumba High Tempo

Zumba Low Tempo

EXPERIMENTAL

The Zumba low tempo group will complete a 10-week (2x a week; 60 minutes per session) virtual adapted aerobic dance intervention (adapted Zumba®). Each session will consist of: a warm-up (3-5 minutes), 5-6 songs with instruction (40 minutes), and a cool down (5 minutes) for a total of about 60 minutes including rest/water breaks and time to transition. The only difference between the two adapted Zumba® programs will be the speed at which the songs will be played and the number of times through each song. The songs for the low-tempo group will be set to three-fourths speed. All sessions will be video recorded and examined for fidelity. This group will complete pre-test, post-test, and a 4-week follow-up.

Behavioral: Zumba Low Tempo

Interventions

The Zumba high tempo group will complete a 10-week (2x a week; 60 minutes per session) virtual adapted aerobic dance intervention (adapted Zumba®). Each session will consist of: a warm-up (3-5 minutes), 5-6 songs with instruction (40 minutes), and a cool down (5 minutes) for a total of about 60 minutes including rest/water breaks and time to transition. The only difference between the two adapted Zumba® programs will be the speed at which the songs will be played and the number of times through each song. The songs for the high-tempo group will be played at full speed; the songs in the high-tempo group will be repeated to ensure an equal amount of time moving for both groups. All sessions will be video recorded and examined for fidelity. This group will complete pre-test, post-test, and a 4-week follow-up.

Zumba High Tempo
Zumba Low TempoBEHAVIORAL

The Zumba low tempo group will complete a 10-week (2x a week; 60 minutes per session) virtual adapted aerobic dance intervention (adapted Zumba®). Each session will consist of: a warm-up (3-5 minutes), 5-6 songs with instruction (40 minutes), and a cool down (5 minutes) for a total of about 60 minutes including rest/water breaks and time to transition. The only difference between the two adapted Zumba® programs will be the speed at which the songs will be played and the number of times through each song. The songs for the low-tempo group will be set to three-fourths speed. All sessions will be video recorded and examined for fidelity. This group will complete pre-test, post-test, and a 4-week follow-up.

Zumba Low Tempo

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Must be healthy enough to participate in exercise (based on the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire or a physician's letter)
  • years or older
  • have a diagnosed Developmental disability (e.g., Autism Spectrum Disorder, Down Syndrome, Intellectual Disability, etc.).

You may not qualify if:

  • Did not participate in 50% or more of the sessions.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Auburn University School of Kinesiology

Auburn, Alabama, 36849, United States

Location

Related Publications (34)

  • Blaskowitz, M., Scott, P., Randall, L., Zelenko, M., Green, M., McGrady, E…, Lonergan, M. (2020) Closing the gap: Identifying self-reported quality of life differences between youth with and without intellectual and developmental disabilities. Inclusion, 8 (3), 241-254.

    BACKGROUND
  • Blomqvist S, Wester A, Sundelin G, Rehn B. Test-retest reliability, smallest real difference and concurrent validity of six different balance tests on young people with mild to moderate intellectual disability. Physiotherapy. 2012 Dec;98(4):313-9. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2011.05.006. Epub 2011 Sep 13.

    PMID: 23122437BACKGROUND
  • Bouzas S, Martinez-Lemos RI, Ayan C. Effects of exercise on the physical fitness level of adults with intellectual disability: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Dec;41(26):3118-3140. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1491646. Epub 2018 Oct 9.

    PMID: 30301367BACKGROUND
  • Carmeli E, Bachar A, Merrick J. Blood parameters in adults with intellectual disability at rest and after endurance exercise. Res Sports Med. 2009;17(2):95-103. doi: 10.1080/15438620902900260.

    PMID: 19479628BACKGROUND
  • Choi L, Liu Z, Matthews CE, Buchowski MS. Validation of accelerometer wear and nonwear time classification algorithm. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Feb;43(2):357-64. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181ed61a3.

    PMID: 20581716BACKGROUND
  • Cleaver S, Hunter D, Ouellette-Kuntz H. Physical mobility limitations in adults with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2009 Feb;53(2):93-105. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2008.01137.x. Epub 2008 Dec 2.

    PMID: 19067784BACKGROUND
  • Cluphf, D., O'Connor, J., & Vanin, S. (2001). Effects of aerobic dance on the cardiovascular endurance of adults with intellectual disabilities. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 18(1).

    BACKGROUND
  • Coppus AM. People with intellectual disability: what do we know about adulthood and life expectancy? Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2013;18(1):6-16. doi: 10.1002/ddrr.1123.

    PMID: 23949824BACKGROUND
  • de Winter CF, Hermans H, Evenhuis HM, Echteld MA. Associations of symptoms of anxiety and depression with diabetes and cardiovascular risk factors in older people with intellectual disability. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2015 Feb;59(2):176-85. doi: 10.1111/jir.12049. Epub 2013 Apr 30.

    PMID: 23627768BACKGROUND
  • Enkelaar L, Smulders E, van Schrojenstein Lantman-de Valk H, Weerdesteyn V, Geurts AC. Clinical measures are feasible and sensitive to assess balance and gait capacities in older persons with mild to moderate Intellectual Disabilities. Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Jan;34(1):276-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2012.08.014. Epub 2012 Sep 15.

    PMID: 22985782BACKGROUND
  • Freedson PS, Lyden K, Kozey-Keadle S, Staudenmayer J. Evaluation of artificial neural network algorithms for predicting METs and activity type from accelerometer data: validation on an independent sample. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2011 Dec;111(6):1804-12. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00309.2011. Epub 2011 Sep 1.

    PMID: 21885802BACKGROUND
  • Frey GC, Stanish HI, Temple VA. Physical activity of youth with intellectual disability: review and research agenda. Adapt Phys Activ Q. 2008 Apr;25(2):95-117. doi: 10.1123/apaq.25.2.95.

    PMID: 18493087BACKGROUND
  • Guerra-Balic M, Oviedo GR, Javierre C, Fortuno J, Barnet-Lopez S, Nino O, Alamo J, Fernhall B. Reliability and validity of the 6-min walk test in adults and seniors with intellectual disabilities. Res Dev Disabil. 2015 Dec;47:144-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2015.09.011. Epub 2015 Sep 29.

    PMID: 26426514BACKGROUND
  • Heller T, Sorensen A. Promoting healthy aging in adults with developmental disabilities. Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2013;18(1):22-30. doi: 10.1002/ddrr.1125.

    PMID: 23949826BACKGROUND
  • Hilapo, P. E., Olea, C. V. B., Panara-ag, A. B., Felismino, N. A., Valera, A. J., & Jr, R. R. V. (2006). Developing speed, flexibility and endurance of people with developmental disabilities using Zumba. Journal of Sciences, Technology and Arts Research, 2, 47-51.

    BACKGROUND
  • Hilgenkamp TI, Reis D, van Wijck R, Evenhuis HM. Physical activity levels in older adults with intellectual disabilities are extremely low. Res Dev Disabil. 2012 Mar-Apr;33(2):477-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.10.011. Epub 2011 Nov 24.

    PMID: 22119695BACKGROUND
  • Ko, T., Han, G., & Cho, B. (2012). Effect of 24 weeks of physical activity therapy on the low leg muscular strength. Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 24(4), 351-353.

    BACKGROUND
  • Joseph, B. M. (2018). The Effects of an 8-Week Zumba® Program for Adults with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. Florida Atlantic University, Ann Arbor. Retrieved from http://spot.lib.auburn.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/effects-8-week-zumba-sup-®-program-adults-with/docview/2185679189/se-2?accountid=8421

    BACKGROUND
  • Lai B, Lee E, Wagatsuma M, Frey G, Stanish H, Jung T, Rimmer JH. Research Trends and Recommendations for Physical Activity Interventions Among Children and Youth With Disabilities: A Review of Reviews. Adapt Phys Activ Q. 2020 Apr 1;37(2):211-234. doi: 10.1123/apaq.2019-0081. Epub 2020 Mar 3.

    PMID: 32131052BACKGROUND
  • Landes SD, Stevens JD, Turk MA. Cause of death in adults with intellectual disability in the United States. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2021 Jan;65(1):47-59. doi: 10.1111/jir.12790. Epub 2020 Oct 12.

    PMID: 33043518BACKGROUND
  • Melville CA, Hamilton S, Hankey CR, Miller S, Boyle S. The prevalence and determinants of obesity in adults with intellectual disabilities. Obes Rev. 2007 May;8(3):223-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2006.00296.x.

    PMID: 17444964BACKGROUND
  • Oppewal A, Hilgenkamp TIM. Physical fitness is predictive for 5-year survival in older adults with intellectual disabilities. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2019 Jul;32(4):958-966. doi: 10.1111/jar.12589. Epub 2019 Apr 5.

    PMID: 30950160BACKGROUND
  • Oppewal A, Hilgenkamp TI, van Wijck R, Evenhuis HM. Cardiorespiratory fitness in individuals with intellectual disabilities--a review. Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Oct;34(10):3301-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.07.005. Epub 2013 Jul 26.

    PMID: 23892875BACKGROUND
  • Ptomey LT, Szabo AN, Willis EA, Gorczyca AM, Greene JL, Danon JC, Donnelly JE. Changes in cognitive function after a 12-week exercise intervention in adults with Down syndrome. Disabil Health J. 2018 Jul;11(3):486-490. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2018.02.003. Epub 2018 Feb 26.

    PMID: 29501470BACKGROUND
  • Rimmer JH, Rowland JL, Yamaki K. Obesity and secondary conditions in adolescents with disabilities: addressing the needs of an underserved population. J Adolesc Health. 2007 Sep;41(3):224-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.05.005.

    PMID: 17707291BACKGROUND
  • Rimmer JH, Chen MD, McCubbin JA, Drum C, Peterson J. Exercise intervention research on persons with disabilities: what we know and where we need to go. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Mar;89(3):249-63. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181c9fa9d.

    PMID: 20068432BACKGROUND
  • Segal M, Eliasziw M, Phillips S, Bandini L, Curtin C, Kral TV, Sherwood NE, Sikich L, Stanish H, Must A. Intellectual disability is associated with increased risk for obesity in a nationally representative sample of U.S. children. Disabil Health J. 2016 Jul;9(3):392-8. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2015.12.003. Epub 2015 Dec 17.

    PMID: 26785808BACKGROUND
  • Shumway-Cook A, Horak FB. Assessing the influence of sensory interaction of balance. Suggestion from the field. Phys Ther. 1986 Oct;66(10):1548-50. doi: 10.1093/ptj/66.10.1548. No abstract available.

    PMID: 3763708BACKGROUND
  • Son S, Jeon B, Kim H. Effects of a walking exercise program for obese individuals with intellectual disability staying in a residential care facility. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016 Mar;28(3):788-93. doi: 10.1589/jpts.28.788. Epub 2016 Mar 31.

    PMID: 27134359BACKGROUND
  • Weintraub S, Dikmen SS, Heaton RK, Tulsky DS, Zelazo PD, Bauer PJ, Carlozzi NE, Slotkin J, Blitz D, Wallner-Allen K, Fox NA, Beaumont JL, Mungas D, Nowinski CJ, Richler J, Deocampo JA, Anderson JE, Manly JJ, Borosh B, Havlik R, Conway K, Edwards E, Freund L, King JW, Moy C, Witt E, Gershon RC. Cognition assessment using the NIH Toolbox. Neurology. 2013 Mar 12;80(11 Suppl 3):S54-64. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182872ded.

    PMID: 23479546BACKGROUND
  • Wu CL, Lin JD, Hu J, Yen CF, Yen CT, Chou YL, Wu PH. The effectiveness of healthy physical fitness programs on people with intellectual disabilities living in a disability institution: six-month short-term effect. Res Dev Disabil. 2010 May-Jun;31(3):713-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2010.01.013. Epub 2010 Feb 20.

    PMID: 20172687BACKGROUND
  • Zablotsky B, Black LI, Maenner MJ, Schieve LA, Danielson ML, Bitsko RH, Blumberg SJ, Kogan MD, Boyle CA. Prevalence and Trends of Developmental Disabilities among Children in the United States: 2009-2017. Pediatrics. 2019 Oct;144(4):e20190811. doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-0811.

    PMID: 31558576BACKGROUND
  • Zelazo PD, Anderson JE, Richler J, Wallner-Allen K, Beaumont JL, Conway KP, Gershon R, Weintraub S. NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (CB): validation of executive function measures in adults. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2014 Jul;20(6):620-9. doi: 10.1017/S1355617714000472. Epub 2014 Jun 24.

    PMID: 24960301BACKGROUND
  • Zur O, Ronen A, Melzer I, Carmeli E. Vestibulo-ocular response and balance control in children and young adults with mild-to-moderate intellectual and developmental disability: a pilot study. Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Jun;34(6):1951-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.03.007. Epub 2013 Apr 11.

    PMID: 23584174BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Developmental DisabilitiesAutism Spectrum DisorderDown SyndromeCerebral Palsy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurodevelopmental DisordersMental DisordersChild Development Disorders, PervasiveIntellectual DisabilityNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesAbnormalities, MultipleCongenital AbnormalitiesCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and AbnormalitiesChromosome DisordersGenetic Diseases, InbornBrain Damage, ChronicBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System Diseases

Study Officials

  • Emily Munn

    Auburn University

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Masking Details
The two different tempo groups will participate in the program using separate HIPPA-compliant Zoom sessions in different rooms at the community programs. The high-tempo group will be called Group 1 and the low-tempo group will be called Group 2.
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Participants will be quasi-randomized to one of three groups: control (normal activities), low-tempo Zumba®, and high-tempo Zumba®. This quasi-randomization enables the groups to be matched on relevant demographics (disability type, age, sex). This design will enable the investigators to determine the effects of Zumba® and the impact of exercise tempo.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 11, 2021

First Posted

January 20, 2022

Study Start

January 26, 2021

Primary Completion

March 30, 2022

Study Completion

March 30, 2022

Last Updated

May 5, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Individual anonymous participant data will be available through a request to the principal investigator.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
5 years following publication.
Access Criteria
Data will be shared with researchers with a minimum qualification of a master's degree in a relevant field (e.g., special education, neuroscience, exercise physiology, kinesiology, disability studies, adapted physical education).

Locations