CAREGIVER KNOWLEDGE AND EXPERIENCE OF CHEWING PROBLEM
1 other identifier
observational
15
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Chewing is the process of making the food taken into the mouth as a bolus with rhythmic, coordinated, and sequential movements. To normal chewing function oral and perioral sensory integrity; adequate lip closure and intraoral pressure; intraoral bolus transport; normal structure and coordination of lips, palate, tongue, jaw joint, chewing muscles should be ensured. Problems that occur in bolus formation starting from taking food into the mouth are called chewing problems. The underlying cause of the chewing problem can be very diverse. The chewing problem can be seen in genetic, neuromuscular, gastrointestinal pediatric diseases as well as cognitive, behavioral problems or in healthy children. Many different health professionals take part in the rehabilitation of the chewing problem, but the family is at the center of the rehabilitation. For this reason, the level of knowledge, experience, and approach of the family is very important. The aim of this study is to determine the swallowing-chewing problem knowledge levels, experiences and approaches of the caregivers of the child with chewing problems.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Jul 2022
Shorter than P25 for all trials
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 26, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 19, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 30, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2022
CompletedJuly 20, 2022
July 1, 2022
2 days
December 26, 2021
July 18, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
chewing awareness
A one-to-one interview will be held with the caregivers in a quiet room, accompanied by a voice recorder. During interview; caregivers perspective, experiences and knowledge of the child's chewing and swallowing problem will be ask. The interviews will continue for a minimum of 20 minutes until sufficient data is collected for thematic analysis. 15 participants will be included in the study.
1 day
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Chewing Function
1 day
Eligibility Criteria
Being a primary caregiver of oral feding children, followed about cheming and swallowimg problem more than 6 months.
You may qualify if:
- being a primary caregiver of oral feding children, followed about chewing and swallowing problem more than 6 months
You may not qualify if:
- Don't except participate to study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (3)
Serel Arslan S, Inal O, Demir N, Olmez MS, Karaduman AA. Chewing side preference is associated with hemispheric laterality in healthy adults. Somatosens Mot Res. 2017 Jun;34(2):92-95. doi: 10.1080/08990220.2017.1308923. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
PMID: 28393655BACKGROUNDSerel Arslan S, Aydin G, Alemdaroglu I, Tunca Yilmaz O, Karaduman AA. Reliability and validity of the Karaduman Chewing Performance Scale in paediatric neuromuscular diseases: A system for classification of chewing disorders. J Oral Rehabil. 2018 Jul;45(7):526-531. doi: 10.1111/joor.12642. Epub 2018 May 20.
PMID: 29727486BACKGROUNDBraun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology. 2006;3(2):77-101.
BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Selen Serel Arslan, assoc. prof.
Hacettepe University Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Ankara, TURKEY
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sena N Begen, MSc
Atilim University, Facultyof Health Sciences Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- FAMILY BASED
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 1 Day
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MSc
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 26, 2021
First Posted
January 19, 2022
Study Start
July 30, 2022
Primary Completion
August 1, 2022
Study Completion
September 1, 2022
Last Updated
July 20, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
For a qualitative content analysis, The thematic analysis process involved multiple distinct phases as described by Braun and Clarke: the stages of familiarizing yourself with your data, generating initial codes, searching for themes, reviewing themes, defining and naming themes, producing the report (1). First, all interviews will be transcribed. A researcher will check the manuscripts, correct ıf there any mistake and make them anonymous. After the codes are determined. 2 researchers will come together at weekly meetings to discuss and develop themes. This approach will continue until no new information becomes available (theoretical saturation).