NCT05194956

Brief Summary

CONTEXT: Digital scanning systems are becoming more and more popular with the advent of the COVID-19 pandemic. The risks surrounding aerosol-generating procedures (AGP) has resulted in practitioners changing their normal practice and finding alternative methods to continue managing their patients. Digital (intraoral) scanners are often used to show patients treatment options and help in educating them regarding their oral hygiene as it produces an almost instant digital image of their teeth. Conventional methods using alginate impressions produce study models which are created in dental plaster or stone, involving a lab cost and a greater environmental impact but remain a popular method of recording a patient's teeth and bite. OBJECTIVE: To investigate patient experience, operator experience and preference in intraoral scanning versus alginate impression taking in the orthodontic setting. DESIGN, SETTING AND SUBJECTS: A randomised controlled two-period crossover trial to be conducted in a UK secondary care setting involving 84 participants ready to start orthodontic treatment, with no experience of impressions/intraoral scans in the last 2 years. Patients with cleft lip and/or palate or recent research involvement will be excluded. OUTCOMES: A modified visual analogue scale, will be used to measure patient and operator reported outcomes (e.g. patient comfort, operator confidence, perceived time taken and induction of cough/gag reflex) following an alginate impression or an intraoral scan using Trios® 3 intraoral scanner (3Shape). The time taken for each procedure will also be measured. Lastly, operator preference will be recorded. CONCLUSION: The proposed study aims to add to the limited evidence base, providing information regarding the use of intraoral scanners compared to alginate impressions from both the orthodontic patient and operator perspectives.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
86

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2022

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 4, 2022

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 18, 2022

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 31, 2022

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 3, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 3, 2023

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 18, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

March 18, 2025

Status Verified

December 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

January 4, 2022

Results QC Date

February 22, 2024

Last Update Submit

February 25, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Orthodontic PatientIntraoral ScanAlginate impressionConventional impressionDigital scanPatient experiencePatient comfortPreference

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Orthodontic Patient Comfort

    A 100mm modified Visual Analogue Scale (VA scale) measuring patient comfort during intraoral scanning taking versus alginate impressions taken in the orthodontic setting. A higher score would indicate a more negative experience. Minimum value: 0, Maximum value: 100

    Immediately following intervention

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • Experience of Pain

    Immediately following intervention

  • Relative Speed of Impression

    Immediately following intervention

  • Nausea and/or Coughing

    Immediately following intervention

  • Likely Recommendation

    Immediately following intervention

  • Ease of Impression for the Operator

    Immediately following intervention

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Arm 1 - Alginate impressions followed by digital intraoral scan

EXPERIMENTAL

The participant will have alginate impressions taken for orthodontic treatment records first. Followed by a digital intraoral scan a minimum of 4-6 weeks washout period. After each intervention, the participant will complete a modified visual analogue scale (VAS) questionnaire about their experience.

Procedure: Intraoral scanProcedure: Alginate impressions

Arm 2 - Digital intraoral scan followed by alginate impressions

EXPERIMENTAL

The participant will have a digital intraoral taken for orthodontic treatment records first. Followed by alginate impressions a minimum of 4-6 weeks washout period. After each intervention, the participant will complete a modified visual analogue scale (VAS) questionnaire about their experience.

Procedure: Intraoral scanProcedure: Alginate impressions

Interventions

An intraoral scan is multiple images taken using an intraoral scanning device which results in a digital mould being taken of the participants mouth and bite. It works by systematically placing the scanner tip over the teeth and gums, whilst it constructs an image on screen.

Arm 1 - Alginate impressions followed by digital intraoral scanArm 2 - Digital intraoral scan followed by alginate impressions

Alginate impressions are the conventional method of creating dental moulds for orthodontic records. A plastic tray is filled with an alginate material, which is placed into the mouth to take a mould of the teeth. This requires two moulds for both top and bottom arches. In addition, the participant would also bite into a warm piece of wax to record their bite.

Arm 1 - Alginate impressions followed by digital intraoral scanArm 2 - Digital intraoral scan followed by alginate impressions

Eligibility Criteria

Age10 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • New patients, aged 10 years and old, attending the Royal Derby Hospital orthodontic department, requiring study model impressions taken prior to commencing orthodontic treatment
  • Participants must be capable of giving informed consent, or have an acceptable individual capable of giving consent on the patient's behalf (e.g. parent or guardian of a child under 16 years of age).

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who have had previous experience of impressions/intraoral scans in the last 2 years
  • Cleft lip and/or palate patients
  • Patient who have been involved in a study in the last 6 months or are currently part of a study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Royal Derby Hospital

Derby, Derbyshire, DE22 3NE, United Kingdom

Location

Results Point of Contact

Title
Mrs Trishna Patel
Organization
University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Trust

Study Officials

  • Alison Murray, BDS, MSc, FDS RCPS, MOrth RCS

    University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Trust

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: Single-centre prospective randomised controlled two-period crossover study
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 4, 2022

First Posted

January 18, 2022

Study Start

May 31, 2022

Primary Completion

January 3, 2023

Study Completion

January 3, 2023

Last Updated

March 18, 2025

Results First Posted

March 18, 2025

Record last verified: 2024-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Only anonymised participant data will be shared on request e.g. for inclusion in a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
Time Frame
The study data is anticipated to become available following publication. Study data will be archived for 5 years from the end of the study.
Access Criteria
Analyses within a meta-analysis would be considered if it has been approved through an independent review committee. Requests may be submitted up to 5 years from the end of the study.

Locations