The Effect of Mindfulnes Program on Stress, Depression and Psychological Well-being in Cancer Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Study design A single blinded, randomized controlled experimental design was used. The study complied with guidelines outlined under the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) checklist. Sample and Participants The study was carried out in July-December 2021 with the participation of cancer patients who were treated at a university hospital in Istanbul/Turkey. Inclusion criteria; Patients aged 18 and over, volunteering to participate in the study, conscious and without communication problems, who did not take any course or practice (intervention?) on anxiety, tension, depression symptoms and coping with stress were included in the study. Participitants randomised intervention and controlled groups.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 20, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 22, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 22, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 24, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 11, 2022
CompletedMay 25, 2023
May 1, 2023
5 months
December 24, 2021
May 23, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
Information Form
This form was developed by the researchers to include the age, gender, marital status, educational status, and treatment method of the participants.
Baseline
State Anxiety Inventory
The State Anxiety Inventory was developed by Spielberger et al. in 1970 to determine the state anxiety levels of individuals. Turkish reliability and validity studies of the inventory were carried out by Öner and Le Compte (1983). The State Anxiety Inventory measures anxiety in adults. In the 20-item State Anxiety Inventory, the total score obtained from the four-point Likert-type inventory for each item can vary between 20 and 80. A high score indicates a high level of anxiety, while a small score indicates a low level of anxiety (Spielberger, et al., 1970; Öner \& Le, 1983). Possible scores on the Scale range from 0 to 19 points (interpreted as meaning no state anxiety), 20 to 39 points (mild), 40 to 59 points (moderate), 60 to 79 points (severe), and 80 points and above ( very severe state anxiety).
Baseline
State Anxiety Inventory
The State Anxiety Inventory was developed by Spielberger et al. in 1970 to determine the state anxiety levels of individuals. Turkish reliability and validity studies of the inventory were carried out by Öner and Le Compte (1983). The State Anxiety Inventory measures anxiety in adults. In the 20-item State Anxiety Inventory, the total score obtained from the four-point Likert-type inventory for each item can vary between 20 and 80. A high score indicates a high level of anxiety, while a small score indicates a low level of anxiety (Spielberger, et al., 1970; Öner \& Le, 1983). Possible scores on the Scale range from 0 to 19 points (interpreted as meaning no state anxiety), 20 to 39 points (mild), 40 to 59 points (moderate), 60 to 79 points (severe), and 80 points and above ( very severe state anxiety).
at the end of week 1
Psychological Well-Being Scale
The scale, which was developed by Diener, Scollon, and Lucas, (2009) to measure the level of psychological well-being, has eight items. It identifies important elements of human function, from positive relationships to feelings of efficacy to having a meaningful and purposeful life. The Turkish validity and reliability of the scale was made by Telef in 2013. Scale items are answered between 1 and 7, as I strongly disagree (1) to I strongly agree (7). All items are expressed positively. Scores range from 8 (strongly disagree to all items) to 56 (strongly agree to all items). The Cronbach's alpha internal consistency coefficient of the scale was found to be 0.87. A high score from the scale indicates that the person has good psychological strength.
baseline
Psychological Well-Being Scale
The scale, which was developed by Diener, Scollon, and Lucas, (2009) to measure the level of psychological well-being, has eight items. It identifies important elements of human function, from positive relationships to feelings of efficacy to having a meaningful and purposeful life. The Turkish validity and reliability of the scale was made by Telef in 2013. Scale items are answered between 1 and 7, as I strongly disagree (1) to I strongly agree (7). All items are expressed positively. Scores range from 8 (strongly disagree to all items) to 56 (strongly agree to all items). The Cronbach's alpha internal consistency coefficient of the scale was found to be 0.87. A high score from the scale indicates that the person has good psychological strength.
at the end of week 1
Beck Depression Inventory
Beck et al. The validity and reliability study of the scale developed by Hisli in 1988 was carried out by Hisli. It is a depression rating scale consisting of 21 questions in total, evaluated by adding the scores between 0-3 obtained from each answer. Scale in line with the corresponding score intervals; 1-10 normal, 11-16 moderate mood disorder, 17-20 clinical depression; It is grouped as moderate depression between 21-30, severe depression between 31-40, and severe depression between 41-63.
baseline
Beck Depression Inventory
Beck et al. The validity and reliability study of the scale developed by Hisli in 1988 was carried out by Hisli. It is a depression rating scale consisting of 21 questions in total, evaluated by adding the scores between 0-3 obtained from each answer. Scale in line with the corresponding score intervals; 1-10 normal, 11-16 moderate mood disorder, 17-20 clinical depression; It is grouped as moderate depression between 21-30, severe depression between 31-40, and severe depression between 41-63.
at the end of week 1.
Study Arms (2)
Intervention
EXPERIMENTALMindfulness-based breathing and music therapy
Control
NO INTERVENTIONNo intervention has been made
Interventions
60 patients in the mindfulness-based breathing and music therapy group were divided into subgroups of 5 participants each. Each 6-person group started by having participants complete the pretest State Anxiety Inventory, Beck Depression Inventory, and Psychological Well-Being Scale via Survey Monkey. Mindfulness-based breathing and music therapy was applied to each patient group in approximately 45-minute sessions per day. At the end of the session, participants re-filled the posttest State Anxiety Inventory, Work-Related Tension Scale, and Psychological Well-Being Scale. A total of 3 sessions were completed with an interval of two days.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years or older,
- volunteering to participate in the study,
- conscious and not having communication problems,
- not taking any course on anxiety, tension, depression symptoms and coping with stress
You may not qualify if:
- Diagnosed with a known psychiatric illness (delirium, anxiety, panic attack, depression) • Take another psychological relaxation course or training
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Istanbul Aydin University
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Dilek YILDIRIM, Ph.D
Istanbul Aydın University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant professor Dr.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 24, 2021
First Posted
January 11, 2022
Study Start
July 20, 2021
Primary Completion
December 22, 2021
Study Completion
December 22, 2021
Last Updated
May 25, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-05