NCT05181371

Brief Summary

Fascial plane blocks, such as ESP, rely on the spread of local anaesthetic on an interfacial plane, automated boluses may be particularly useful for this group of blocks. However, until recently, ambulatory pumps capable of providing automated boluses in addition to patient-controlled boluses were not widely available. To best of our knowledge, there are no randomised controlled trials comparing continuous infusion versus intermittent bolus strategies for Erector Spinae Plane Block for MITS in terms of patient centred outcomes such as quality of recovery.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2022

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 19, 2021

Completed
18 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 6, 2022

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 2, 2022

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

September 21, 2023

Status Verified

September 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

December 19, 2021

Last Update Submit

September 17, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Regional AnesthesiaErector Spinae BlockVATSQuality of RecoveryAcute pain

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Quality of Recovery (QoR-15)

    Patient centred metric to measure the quality of recovery after surgery. Scale is between 0-150, where '0' refers to poor quality of recovery and '150' refers to excellent quality of recovery

    24 hours

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Maximal inspiratory volume

    48 hours

  • Area Under the Curve for Verbal Rating Score for pain at rest

    48 hours

  • Area Under the Curve for Verbal Rating Score for pain on deep inspiration

    48 hours

  • Time to first intravenous opioid

    48 hours

  • Time to first mobilisation

    48 hours

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Ultrasound Guided ESP Block with Programmed Intermittent Bolus (PIB)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

After induction of general anaesthesia, an ESP catheter will be inserted at the level of T5. A bolus dose of 20 ml 0.25% Levobupicaine will be administered into the ESP space. Two hours post bolus administration, patients will receive programmed intermittent bolus of local anaesthetic: 20mls 0.125% levobupivacaine every two hours.

Procedure: Ultrasound Guided ESP Block with Programmed Intermittent Bolus (PIB) for VATS

Ultrasound Guided ESP Block with Continuous Infusion (CI)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

After induction of general anaesthesia, an ESP catheter will be inserted at the level of T5. A bolus dose of 20 ml 0.25% Levobupicaine will be administered into the ESP space. Two hours post bolus administration, patients will receive a continuous infusion local anaesthetic: 0.125% levobupivacaine at an infusion rate of 10 ml/hr.

Procedure: Ultrasound Guided ESP Block with Continuous Infusion (CI) for VATS

Interventions

Programmed Intermittent Bolus (PIB) of Levobupivacaine

Ultrasound Guided ESP Block with Programmed Intermittent Bolus (PIB)

Continuous Infusion (CI) of Levobupivacaine

Ultrasound Guided ESP Block with Continuous Infusion (CI)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 85 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Male and Female aged \> 18
  • Able to provide written informed consent
  • ASA grade I - V
  • VATS surgery
  • Weight \> 55kg

You may not qualify if:

  • Absence of or inability to give informed consent
  • Pre-existing infection at block site
  • Severe coagulopathy
  • Allergy to local anaesthesia (or another contraindication to block performance)
  • Previous history of opiate abuse
  • Pre-existing chronic pain condition
  • Pre-existing dementia (due to need to co-operate in completing QoR-15 score day after surgery
  • Postoperative admission to ICU for continued ventilation
  • BMI \> 40 kg/m2

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Mater Misericordiae University Hospital

Dublin, D07 R2WY, Ireland

Location

St Jame's University Hospital

Dublin, D08 NHy1, Ireland

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Finnerty D, Ni Eochagain A, Ahmed M, Poynton A, Butler JS, Buggy DJ. A randomised trial of bilateral erector spinae plane block vs. no block for thoracolumbar decompressive spinal surgery. Anaesthesia. 2021 Nov;76(11):1499-1503. doi: 10.1111/anae.15488. Epub 2021 Apr 20.

    PMID: 33878196BACKGROUND
  • Finnerty DT, McMahon A, McNamara JR, Hartigan SD, Griffin M, Buggy DJ. Comparing erector spinae plane block with serratus anterior plane block for minimally invasive thoracic surgery: a randomised clinical trial. Br J Anaesth. 2020 Nov;125(5):802-810. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.06.020. Epub 2020 Jul 11.

    PMID: 32660716BACKGROUND
  • Onuoha OC. Epidural Analgesia for Labor: Continuous Infusion Versus Programmed Intermittent Bolus. Anesthesiol Clin. 2017 Mar;35(1):1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2016.09.003. Epub 2016 Dec 12.

    PMID: 28131113BACKGROUND
  • Ilfeld BM, Gabriel RA. Basal infusion versus intermittent boluses for perineural catheters: should we take the 'continuous' out of 'continuous peripheral nerve blocks'? Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Mar;44(3):285-286. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2018-100262. Epub 2019 Jan 13. No abstract available.

    PMID: 30636717BACKGROUND
  • Eochagain AN, Moorthy A, O'Gara A, Buggy DJ. Ultrasound-guided, continuous erector spinae plane (ESP) block in minimally invasive thoracic surgery-comparing programmed intermittent bolus (PIB) vs continuous infusion on quality of recovery and postoperative respiratory function: a double-blinded randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2022 Sep 21;23(1):792. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06726-7.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Acute Pain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Donal Buggy

    Mater University Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Anaesthesia Specialist Registrar

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 19, 2021

First Posted

January 6, 2022

Study Start

June 2, 2022

Primary Completion

August 1, 2023

Study Completion

August 1, 2023

Last Updated

September 21, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Individual Patient Data sharing will be supported with qualified external researchers and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. All data provided will be coded and anonymised to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, CSR
Time Frame
5 years
Access Criteria
Publications, reports or query requests from future investigators.

Locations