ESP Block in VATS: Programmed Intermittent Bolus Versus Continuous Infusion on Quality of Recovery
Ultrasound Guided, Continuous Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block in Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery: Comparing Programmed Intermittent Bolus (PIB) vs Continuous Infusion on Quality of Recovery and Postoperative Respiratory Function
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Fascial plane blocks, such as ESP, rely on the spread of local anaesthetic on an interfacial plane, automated boluses may be particularly useful for this group of blocks. However, until recently, ambulatory pumps capable of providing automated boluses in addition to patient-controlled boluses were not widely available. To best of our knowledge, there are no randomised controlled trials comparing continuous infusion versus intermittent bolus strategies for Erector Spinae Plane Block for MITS in terms of patient centred outcomes such as quality of recovery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2022
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 19, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 6, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 2, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2023
CompletedSeptember 21, 2023
September 1, 2023
1.2 years
December 19, 2021
September 17, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Quality of Recovery (QoR-15)
Patient centred metric to measure the quality of recovery after surgery. Scale is between 0-150, where '0' refers to poor quality of recovery and '150' refers to excellent quality of recovery
24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Maximal inspiratory volume
48 hours
Area Under the Curve for Verbal Rating Score for pain at rest
48 hours
Area Under the Curve for Verbal Rating Score for pain on deep inspiration
48 hours
Time to first intravenous opioid
48 hours
Time to first mobilisation
48 hours
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Ultrasound Guided ESP Block with Programmed Intermittent Bolus (PIB)
ACTIVE COMPARATORAfter induction of general anaesthesia, an ESP catheter will be inserted at the level of T5. A bolus dose of 20 ml 0.25% Levobupicaine will be administered into the ESP space. Two hours post bolus administration, patients will receive programmed intermittent bolus of local anaesthetic: 20mls 0.125% levobupivacaine every two hours.
Ultrasound Guided ESP Block with Continuous Infusion (CI)
ACTIVE COMPARATORAfter induction of general anaesthesia, an ESP catheter will be inserted at the level of T5. A bolus dose of 20 ml 0.25% Levobupicaine will be administered into the ESP space. Two hours post bolus administration, patients will receive a continuous infusion local anaesthetic: 0.125% levobupivacaine at an infusion rate of 10 ml/hr.
Interventions
Programmed Intermittent Bolus (PIB) of Levobupivacaine
Continuous Infusion (CI) of Levobupivacaine
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male and Female aged \> 18
- Able to provide written informed consent
- ASA grade I - V
- VATS surgery
- Weight \> 55kg
You may not qualify if:
- Absence of or inability to give informed consent
- Pre-existing infection at block site
- Severe coagulopathy
- Allergy to local anaesthesia (or another contraindication to block performance)
- Previous history of opiate abuse
- Pre-existing chronic pain condition
- Pre-existing dementia (due to need to co-operate in completing QoR-15 score day after surgery
- Postoperative admission to ICU for continued ventilation
- BMI \> 40 kg/m2
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Mater Misericordiae University Hospital
Dublin, D07 R2WY, Ireland
St Jame's University Hospital
Dublin, D08 NHy1, Ireland
Related Publications (5)
Finnerty D, Ni Eochagain A, Ahmed M, Poynton A, Butler JS, Buggy DJ. A randomised trial of bilateral erector spinae plane block vs. no block for thoracolumbar decompressive spinal surgery. Anaesthesia. 2021 Nov;76(11):1499-1503. doi: 10.1111/anae.15488. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
PMID: 33878196BACKGROUNDFinnerty DT, McMahon A, McNamara JR, Hartigan SD, Griffin M, Buggy DJ. Comparing erector spinae plane block with serratus anterior plane block for minimally invasive thoracic surgery: a randomised clinical trial. Br J Anaesth. 2020 Nov;125(5):802-810. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.06.020. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
PMID: 32660716BACKGROUNDOnuoha OC. Epidural Analgesia for Labor: Continuous Infusion Versus Programmed Intermittent Bolus. Anesthesiol Clin. 2017 Mar;35(1):1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2016.09.003. Epub 2016 Dec 12.
PMID: 28131113BACKGROUNDIlfeld BM, Gabriel RA. Basal infusion versus intermittent boluses for perineural catheters: should we take the 'continuous' out of 'continuous peripheral nerve blocks'? Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Mar;44(3):285-286. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2018-100262. Epub 2019 Jan 13. No abstract available.
PMID: 30636717BACKGROUNDEochagain AN, Moorthy A, O'Gara A, Buggy DJ. Ultrasound-guided, continuous erector spinae plane (ESP) block in minimally invasive thoracic surgery-comparing programmed intermittent bolus (PIB) vs continuous infusion on quality of recovery and postoperative respiratory function: a double-blinded randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2022 Sep 21;23(1):792. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06726-7.
PMID: 36131308DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Donal Buggy
Mater University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Anaesthesia Specialist Registrar
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 19, 2021
First Posted
January 6, 2022
Study Start
June 2, 2022
Primary Completion
August 1, 2023
Study Completion
August 1, 2023
Last Updated
September 21, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, CSR
- Time Frame
- 5 years
- Access Criteria
- Publications, reports or query requests from future investigators.
Individual Patient Data sharing will be supported with qualified external researchers and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. All data provided will be coded and anonymised to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial.