Examining the Effect of EEG-guided Theta Burst Stimulation in Bipolar Disorder
Establishing the Effect of Electroencephalography (EEG)-Guided Theta Burst Stimulation on Reducing Mania/Hypomania-related Affect and Reward Driven Behavior in Bipolar Disorder
1 other identifier
interventional
13
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Bipolar Disorder (BD) is a common and highly debilitating psychiatric disorder, however, the predisposing brain mechanisms are poorly understood. Here, the investigators will conduct a proof of concept study that will examine the effect of electroencephalography (EEG)-guided theta burst stimulation (TBS) on reducing mania/hypomania-related affect and reward driven behavior in adults with BD. The investigators hypothesize that TBS will reduce mania/hypomania-related affect and reward driven behavior in adults with BD.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 16, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 5, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 23, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 31, 2023
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 19, 2024
CompletedSeptember 19, 2024
August 1, 2024
1.4 years
December 16, 2021
May 24, 2024
August 22, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
Brain Activity (Beta Power) in Left vLPFC
The difference in brain activity (Beta power) in left vLPFC from pre TBS to post TBS. Higher numbers indicate more brain activity after TBS, while lower numbers indicate less brain activity (Beta power) after TBS.
Change in magnitude of brain activity (Beta power) immediately before and immediately after each TBS condition at EEG/TBS visits (15-30 mins)
Brain Activity (Beta Power) in Right vLPFC
The difference in brain activity (Beta power) in right vLPFC from pre TBS to post TBS. Higher numbers indicate more brain activity (Beta power) after TBS, while lower numbers indicate less brain activity (Beta power) after TBS.
Change in magnitude of brain activity (Beta power) immediately before and immediately after each TBS condition at EEG/TBS visits (15-30 mins)
Brain Activity (Beta Power) in Left dlPFC
The difference in brain activity (Beta power) in left dLPFC from pre TBS to post TBS. Higher numbers indicate more brain activity (Beta power) after TBS, while lower numbers indicate less brain activity (Beta power) after TBS.
Change in magnitude of brain activity (Beta power) immediately before and immediately after each TBS condition at EEG/TBS visits (15-30 mins)
Brain Activity (Beta Power) in Right dlPFC
The difference in brain activity (Beta power) in right dLPFC from pre TBS to post TBS. Higher numbers indicate more brain activity (Beta power) after TBS, while lower numbers indicate less brain activity (Beta power) after TBS.
Change in magnitude of brain activity (Beta power) immediately before and immediately after each TBS condition at EEG/TBS visits (15-30 mins)
Functional Connectivity Between Left and Right vLPFC
The difference in functional connectivity (a measure of interactions between 2 brain regions) among left and right vLPFC from preTBS to post TBS. Higher numbers indicate more functional connectivity after TBS, while lower numbers indicate less functional connectivity after TBS.
Change in magnitude of the functional connectivity immediately before and immediately after each TBS condition at EEG/TBS visits (15-30 mins)
Functional Connectivity Between vLPFC and Other RNet Regions
The difference in functional connectivity (a measure of interactions between 2 brain regions) among vLPFC and other RNet regions from pre TBS to post TBS. Higher numbers indicate more functional connectivity after TBS, while lower numbers indicate less functional connectivity after TBS.
Change in magnitude of functional connectivity immediately before and immediately after each TBS condition at EEG/TBS visits (15-30 mins)
Functional Connectivity Between dlPFC With Other CEN Regions
The difference in functional connectivity (a measure of interactions between 2 brain regions) among dlPFC and other RNet regions from pre TBS to post TBS. Higher numbers indicate more functional connectivity after TBS, while lower numbers indicate less functional connectivity after TBS.
Change in magnitude of functional connectivity immediately before and immediately after each TBS condition at EEG/TBS visits (15-30 mins)
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Brain Activity (Beta Power) in Other RNet and CEN Regions
Change in magnitude of brain activity (Beta power) immediately before and immediately after each TBS condition at EEG/TBS visits (15-30 mins)
Functional Connectivity Among Other RNet and CEN Regions
Change in magnitude of functional connectivity immediately before and immediately after each TBS condition at EEG/TBS visits (15-30 mins)
Immediate Choices Made on the Delay Discounting Task
15-30 minutes
Study Arms (6)
Left vLPFC cTBS/right dlPFC iTBS/left Som cTBS
EXPERIMENTALA random number sequence will be generated for randomization of the 3 EEG/TBS session order to which each participant is assigned: left vlPFC cTBS (cTBS applied to the left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex) right dlPFC iTBS (iTBS applied to the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex) left Som cTBS (cTBS applied to the left somatosensory cortex)
Left vLPFC cTBS/left Som cTBS/right dlPFC iTBS
EXPERIMENTALA random number sequence will be generated for randomization of the 3 EEG/TBS session order to which each participant is assigned: left vlPFC cTBS (cTBS applied to the left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex) left Som cTBS (cTBS applied to the left somatosensory cortex) right dlPFC iTBS (iTBS applied to the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex)
left Som cTBS/right dlPFC iTBS/Left vLPFC cTBS
EXPERIMENTALA random number sequence will be generated for randomization of the 3 EEG/TBS session order to which each participant is assigned: left Som cTBS (cTBS applied to the left somatosensory cortex) right dlPFC iTBS (iTBS applied to the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex) left vlPFC cTBS (cTBS applied to the left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex)
left Som cTBS/Left vLPFC cTBS/right dlPFC iTBS
EXPERIMENTALA random number sequence will be generated for randomization of the 3 EEG/TBS session order to which each participant is assigned: left Som cTBS (cTBS applied to the left somatosensory cortex) left vlPFC cTBS (cTBS applied to the left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex) right dlPFC iTBS (iTBS applied to the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex)
right dlPFC iTBS/left Som cTBS/Left vLPFC cTBS
EXPERIMENTALA random number sequence will be generated for randomization of the 3 EEG/TBS session order to which each participant is assigned: right dlPFC iTBS (iTBS applied to the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex) left Som cTBS (cTBS applied to the left somatosensory cortex) left vlPFC cTBS (cTBS applied to the left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex)
right dlPFC iTBS/Left vLPFC cTBS/left Som cTBS
EXPERIMENTALA random number sequence will be generated for randomization of the 3 EEG/TBS session order to which each participant is assigned: right dlPFC iTBS (iTBS applied to the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex) left vlPFC cTBS (cTBS applied to the left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex) left Som cTBS (cTBS applied to the left somatosensory cortex)
Interventions
cTBS is a brief stimulation of a part of the brain with a magnetic field that passes through the scalp and skull safely that can decrease the excitability of cortical neurons. It is FDA-approved as a treatment for psychological conditions including depression; however, this device is not approved for the treatment of adults with Bipolar Disorder I or for use in healthy adults. This research study is using the cTBS off label in all participants (those with and without Bipolar Disorder I) to examine research questions
iTBS is a brief stimulation of a part of the brain with a magnetic field that passes through the scalp and skull safely to increase the excitability of cortical neurons. It is FDA-approved as a treatment for psychological conditions including depression; however, this device is not approved for the treatment of adults with Bipolar Disorder I or for use in healthy adults. This research study is using the cTBS off label in all participants (those with and without Bipolar Disorder I) to examine research questions.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years of age
- Diagnosis of BD (DSM-5 criteria) in remission (euthymic for \>2 months) or in a manic/hypomanic episode \[manic/hypomanic or euthymic adults with BD (3-fifths manic/hypomanic); euthymic for \> 2 months from most recent BD episode OR current manic/hypomanic episode\]
- Not psychotic
- Score \<3 on delusions, hallucinations, unusual thought content, and conceptual disorganization items of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)
- Unmedicated or on any combination of anxiolytics (benzodiazepines, buspirone, pregabalin, hydroxyzine) as needed, and/or atypical antipsychotics, and/or lithium, and/or other mood stabilizers, and/or non-SNRI antidepressants and/or non benzodiazepine hypnotics, as these are commonly-prescribed medications for BD
- Provides the contact information of a medical provider (including but not limited to a PCP) that we may communicate with for any concerns of escalating symptoms of mania
You may not qualify if:
- Not 18-35 years of age
- Diagnosis of BD in a depressive episode or Diagnosis of BP in partial remission, euthymia that fails to meet full remission criterion of a period of at least 2 months in which there are no significant symptoms, e.g., only partial remission of symptoms or full remission of symptoms but for \<2 months
- Diagnosis of BD in a depressive episode
- Binge alcohol drinking
- History of head injury, neurological, pervasive developmental disorder (e.g. autism), systemic medical disease and treatment (medical records, participant report)
- Mini-Mental State Examination score (cognitive state) \<24
- Premorbid NAART IQ estimate\<85
- Visual disturbance: \<20/40 Snellen visual acuity
- History of alcohol/substance use disorder (SUD; all substances, except nicotine), and/or illicit substance use (except cannabis) over the last 6 months (SCID-5). Note: lifetime/present cannabis use (at non-abuse (\<3 times in the past month) and non SUD levels) will be allowed, given its common usage in BD and young adults. Cannabis SUD over the last 6 months will not be allowed. Urine tests on scan days will exclude current illicit substance use (except cannabis). Salivary alcohol tests on scan days will exclude intoxicated individuals
- Binge drinking in the week before, and/or \>3 units/day for the 3 days before, and/or alcohol in the last 12 hrs before, any TBS visit, confirmed at screening and scan days (to avoid TBS during alcohol withdrawal). Alcohol/nicotine/ caffeine/cannabis use (below SCID-5 SUD, binge levels) will be allowed, and used as covariates
- Scoring greater than or equal to 8 on HRSD at screen visit and depressive episode is confirmed on SCID-5
- Scoring greater than or equal to 18 on HRSD at any study visit
- Psychosis
- Scoring greater than or equal to 38 on the YMRS at any study visit
- Does not provide the contact information of a medical provider (including but not limited to a PCP) that we may communicate with for any concerns of escalating symptoms of mania
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Mary Phillips, MD MD (Cantab)lead
- Milken Institutecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, United States
Related Publications (1)
Mayeli A, Wang Y, Graur S, Ghane M, Keihani A, Kim A, Janssen S, Huston C, Coffman BA, Ferrarelli F, Phillips ML. Effects of theta burst stimulation on reward processing and decision-making in bipolar disorder: A pilot study. Brain Stimul. 2024 Mar-Apr;17(2):163-165. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2024.02.002. Epub 2024 Feb 7. No abstract available.
PMID: 38336341RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Mary Phillips
- Organization
- University of Pittsburgh
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mary L Phillips, MD, MD
University of Pittsburgh
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Fabio Ferrarelli, MD, PhD
University of Pittsburgh
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 16, 2021
First Posted
January 5, 2022
Study Start
March 23, 2022
Primary Completion
July 31, 2023
Study Completion
July 31, 2023
Last Updated
September 19, 2024
Results First Posted
September 19, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Time Frame
- The PIs reserve the right to publish on the stated aims in a timely manner during the period of the award. Data will be available for addressing other research questions (i.e. which are not described in funded/pending grants) as soon as the data have been checked for accuracy (a period which will be no later than one year after the completion of each assessment). After the award has ended, the study investigators will continue to test the stated aims, but will also continue to solicit collaborations with outside researchers and to consider data requests in a timely manner.
- Access Criteria
- Outside investigators must submit a 1)proposal of the study aims, hypotheses, variables/constructs, analytic approach, and estimated duration of the proposed research; 2)resume, qualifications, source of financial support, and conflict of interest statement; 3)sign a data-sharing agreement and confidentiality statement that stipulates using the data for the stated research purposes only, securing the data using appropriate computer technology, not manipulating the data in order to identify participants, acknowledging the grant that supported data collection and management in publications/presentations, and destroying or returning the data after analyses are complete; 4)obtain approval from their Institutional Review Board, and along with other staff members who have access to the data, submit certificates of the University of Pittsburgh Education and Certification Program in Research Practice Fundamentals or provide written documentation pf similar human subjects protection training.
Informed consent will be collected from study participants that allows for broad sharing of participants' de-identified data. Data transfer procedures will be in accordance with all Institutional Review Board guidelines and federal regulations including HIPAA.