NCT05178706

Brief Summary

Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy (FSHD) is one of the most common forms of muscular dystrophy, characterized by pronounced skeletal weakness and with a broad spectrum of diseases. It is a hereditary disease seen in 3-5/100,000 of society, usually starting with weakness in the facial and shoulder muscles and progressing to the trunk, pelvis and leg muscles, giving symptoms in the twenties. In FSHD, which shows slow progression and can lead to loss of ambulation ability in about 20% of patients, patients may have difficulty performing activities above shoulder level with the influence of the periscapular area. The goal of FSHD treatment is to improve muscle strength and/or function. Treatments include medical, conservative and surgical methods. The aim of surgical methods is to improve shoulder function and prevent pain caused by the movements of the scapula. The publications on physiotherapy interventions and aerobic exercise are available as conservative treatment. In patients diagnosed with FSHD, conservative treatment is frequently used to improve muscle strength, regulate function and improve the quality of life of patients. Patients with FSHD use their affected upper extremities asymmetrically, which leads to the development of restrictive compensation mechanisms in the development of symmetrical postural control. Postural control deficits may occur due to limited use of the affected scapula in individuals with FSHD. Accordingly, in cases with FSHD, there is the use of atypical movements for balance and mobility. It is not yet known whether people with FSHD really have poorer dynamic stability during self-initiated whole-body movements such as walking, and at what stage of the disease these difficulties arise. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to examine the effects of rehabilitation approaches applied to the upper limb on upper limb function, balance and walking in patients with FSHD. H1: Within the group of patients with FSHD patients underwent surgery arthrodesis surgery scapulothoracic applied to pre-treatment with the parameters of the rehabilitation program for the evaluation of upper limb functionality after applying the upper extremities, postural control and gait parameters examined, there is statistical difference between the groups.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
36

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2022

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 20, 2021

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 5, 2022

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 22, 2022

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 23, 2022

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 10, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

October 12, 2023

Status Verified

October 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

November 20, 2021

Last Update Submit

October 10, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Neuromuscular DiseaseScapulothoracic ArthrodesisExercise TherapyKinetic Chain

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • change from baseline 10 Meter Walk Test value at 8 weeks

    during the test, the patient is asked to walk at a normal walking speed at a distance of 10 meters determined before the test. The time it has traveled the specified distance is recorded. It is a long-term performance test used for dynamic balance assessment.

    baseline and every four weeks up to eight week

  • change from baseline Gait Analyzer for walking speed at 8 weeks (m/sec)

    It is a smartphone-based application for analyzing walking parameters in real time. It can measure walking speed, step time, step length, cadence and symmetry.

    baseline and every four weeks up to eight week

  • change from baseline Gait Analyzer for step time at 8 weeks (sec)

    It is a smartphone-based application for analyzing walking parameters in real time. It can measure walking speed, step time, step length, cadence and symmetry.

    baseline and every four weeks up to eight week

  • change from baseline Gait Analyzer for step lenght at 8 weeks (m)

    It is a smartphone-based application for analyzing walking parameters in real time. It can measure walking speed, step time, step length, cadence and symmetry.

    baseline and every four weeks up to eight week

  • change from baseline Gait Analyzer for cadance at 8 weeks (step/min)

    It is a smartphone-based application for analyzing walking parameters in real time. It can measure walking speed, step time, step length, cadence and symmetry.

    baseline and every four weeks up to eight week

  • change from baseline Gait Analyzer for symmetry at 8 weeks (%)

    It is a smartphone-based application for analyzing walking parameters in real time. It can measure walking speed, step time, step length, cadence and symmetry.

    baseline and every four weeks up to eight week

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • change from baseline Timed up and Go Test at 8 weeks

    baseline and every four weeks up to eight week

  • change from baseline Single Leg Stance Test at 8 weeks

    baseline and every four weeks up to eight week

  • change from baseline 30 Seconds Sit Up Test at 8 weeks

    baseline and every four weeks up to eight week

  • change from baseline Hand-Held Dynamometer values at 8 weeks

    baseline and every four weeks up to eight week

  • change from baseline Pedometer values at 8 weeks

    baseline and every four weeks up to eight week

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

non-operative conservative treatment

9 individuals diagnosed with FSHD who have not undergone unilateral or bilateral surgery who meet the inclusion criteria. application of determined outcome scales and rehabilitation program on patients

Other: upper extremity rehabilitation programDiagnostic Test: Results of assessment

scapulothoracic arthrodesis

9 individuals diagnosed with FSHD who have undergone bilateral surgery who meet the inclusion criteria. application of determined outcome scales and rehabilitation program on patients

Other: upper extremity rehabilitation programDiagnostic Test: Results of assessment

healthy control

18 participants for measuring the normative datas; application of determined outcome scales

Diagnostic Test: Results of assessment

Interventions

Patients with FSHD who have undergone and have not undergone surgery will be given activity training by the same physiotherapist after they agree to participate in the study. Both groups will be given the same exercises, the same number of repetitions and the same frequency. A two-phase exercise protocol will be established and progression will be performed after 4 weeks. The exercises will be based on the upper extremity and will include various types of exercises and the primary affected November muscles in the upper extremity. It is planned that the exercises will be accompanied by a physiotherapist 2 days a week, with a total of 16 sessions for 8 weeks. It is planned that there will be a total of 8-10 exercises in 10 repetitions in the exercise program. The total length of the exercise session will be 30 minutes. It is planned that the same physiotherapist will be one-on-one with the patient from the beginning to the end of the exercises.

non-operative conservative treatmentscapulothoracic arthrodesis
Results of assessmentDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The total follow-up period of participants included in intervention programs will be 8 weeks. Evaluations will be evaluated by physiotherapist before and at the end of treatment.

healthy controlnon-operative conservative treatmentscapulothoracic arthrodesis

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 50 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Patients who have been diagnosed with FSHD, patients who have undergone scapulothoracic arthrodesis, healthy people for control group

You may qualify if:

  • Individuals to be included in all groups 18-50 years
  • Score between 0.5 and 3.5 according to CSS (Clinical Severity Score) of the cases to be included in the intervention groups.
  • Be rated between 3-5 according to FAS (functional ambulation scale) of the cases to be included in intervention groups
  • For patients who will be included in the intervention group who have undergone surgery, bilateral scapulothoracic arthrodesis surgery within 3 months at the earliest
  • Individuals who will be included in the control group consisting of healthy individuals have not undergone any orthopedic surgery

You may not qualify if:

  • Having received regular physiotherapy for 1 month, at least 2 days a week in the last 6 months
  • Presence of additional neurological problem/problems
  • Presence of any other upper limb problem/problems and surgery
  • Presence of lower limb problems/problems that can cause balance and walking problems
  • Having undergone Spinal fusion surgery
  • Having lower back pain described 6 and above according to VAS (Visual Analog Scale) in intervention and control groups
  • Having a level of visual and auditory problems that will prevent communication

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa

Istanbul, 34500, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (10)

  • Fecek C, Emmady PD. Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy. 2023 Jun 26. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK559028/

    PMID: 32644454BACKGROUND
  • Rijken NH, van Engelen BG, Weerdesteyn V, Geurts AC. Clinical Functional Capacity Testing in Patients With Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy: Construct Validity and Interrater Reliability of Antigravity Tests. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Dec;96(12):2201-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.08.429. Epub 2015 Sep 9.

    PMID: 26363336BACKGROUND
  • Tawil R, Van Der Maarel SM. Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. Muscle Nerve. 2006 Jul;34(1):1-15. doi: 10.1002/mus.20522.

    PMID: 16508966BACKGROUND
  • Kang PB, Morrison L, Iannaccone ST, Graham RJ, Bonnemann CG, Rutkowski A, Hornyak J, Wang CH, North K, Oskoui M, Getchius TS, Cox JA, Hagen EE, Gronseth G, Griggs RC; Guideline Development Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the Practice Issues Review Panel of the American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine. Evidence-based guideline summary: evaluation, diagnosis, and management of congenital muscular dystrophy: Report of the Guideline Development Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the Practice Issues Review Panel of the American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine. Neurology. 2015 Mar 31;84(13):1369-78. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001416.

    PMID: 25825463BACKGROUND
  • Tawil R, Kissel JT, Heatwole C, Pandya S, Gronseth G, Benatar M; Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology; Practice Issues Review Panel of the American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine. Evidence-based guideline summary: Evaluation, diagnosis, and management of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy: Report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the Practice Issues Review Panel of the American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine. Neurology. 2015 Jul 28;85(4):357-64. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001783.

    PMID: 26215877BACKGROUND
  • Kord D, Liu E, Horner NS, Athwal GS, Khan M, Alolabi B. Outcomes of scapulothoracic fusion in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy: A systematic review. Shoulder Elbow. 2020 Apr;12(2):75-90. doi: 10.1177/1758573219866195. Epub 2019 Aug 14.

    PMID: 32313557BACKGROUND
  • Iosa M, Mazza C, Pecoraro F, Aprile I, Ricci E, Cappozzo A. Control of the upper body movements during level walking in patients with facioscapulohumeral dystrophy. Gait Posture. 2010 Jan;31(1):68-72. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.08.247. Epub 2009 Sep 25.

    PMID: 19782569BACKGROUND
  • Rijken NH, van Engelen BG, de Rooy JW, Weerdesteyn V, Geurts AC. Gait propulsion in patients with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy and ankle plantarflexor weakness. Gait Posture. 2015 Feb;41(2):476-81. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.11.013. Epub 2014 Dec 2.

    PMID: 25687333BACKGROUND
  • Eagle M. Report on the muscular dystrophy campaign workshop: exercise in neuromuscular diseases Newcastle, January 2002. Neuromuscul Disord. 2002 Dec;12(10):975-83. doi: 10.1016/s0960-8966(02)00136-0. No abstract available.

    PMID: 12467755BACKGROUND
  • Statland JM, Tawil R. Risk of functional impairment in Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. Muscle Nerve. 2014 Apr;49(4):520-7. doi: 10.1002/mus.23949. Epub 2014 Feb 10.

    PMID: 23873337BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Muscular Dystrophy, FacioscapulohumeralNeuromuscular Diseases

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Muscular DystrophiesMuscular Disorders, AtrophicMuscular DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesNervous System DiseasesGenetic Diseases, InbornCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities

Study Officials

  • Ipek Yeldan Karagoz, PhD

    Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE CONTROL
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 20, 2021

First Posted

January 5, 2022

Study Start

February 22, 2022

Primary Completion

April 23, 2022

Study Completion

June 10, 2022

Last Updated

October 12, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-10

Locations