NCT05176860

Brief Summary

This is a feasibility study investigating the image quality of a new, high-performance cone beam CT (CBCT) used for on-couch imaging during radiotherapy treatments.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
31

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable lung-cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2022

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable lung-cancer

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 16, 2021

Completed
19 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 4, 2022

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 20, 2022

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 30, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 30, 2023

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 6, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

May 6, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

December 16, 2021

Results QC Date

March 12, 2026

Last Update Submit

April 15, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • CBCT Image Quality - Artifact Index

    Artifact Index (AI) is a measurement of the strength of imaging artifact and the degree to which is affects visibility of anatomical structures in the vicinity of the artifact. Artifacts can be produced in CT and CBCT images by a number of factors, such as metal implants, gas, or breathing motion. AI = sqrt((STD\_VOI)\^2 - (STD\_background)\^2), where STD\_VOI is the standard deviation of the image Hounsfield Units in a region of interest at the location of an artifact, and STD\_background is the standard deviation of the Hounsfield Unit values in the background (i.e. in similar tissue but away from the artifact. A lower AI value indicates that the artifact has a lower impact on image quality. Artifacts were identified in all study participants. The median AI across the study population is presented for four imaging modalities.

    1 day

  • CBCT Image Quality - Image Nonuniformity

    Nonuniformity (NU) is a measure of the variation of CT image intensity in uniform tissue. NU = (HU\_max - HU\_min)/(HU\_max + HU\_min), where HU\_max and HU\_min are the maximum and minimum Hounsfield Unit values among multiple locations sampled within regions of uniform tissue that were relevant to the anatomy of interest (e.g., a uniform region of breast tissue for patients undergoing breast treatments). A lower NU represents greater uniformity of CT image intensity within a region of interest. Median NU across the study population is presented for four imaging modalities.

    1 day

  • CBCT Image Quality - Contrast

    Contrast represents the ability to distinguish between two different regions in a CT image (e.g. to distinguish between two adjacent organs). Contrast = \|HU1 - HU2\| where HU1 and HU2 are the mean HU values in two different 100 mm\^2 ROIs, where the ROIs were located in two different tissue types that were relevant to the site being treated (e.g., in the liver and in perihepatic fat for liver treatments). Higher contrast values indicate that it is easier to distinguish between regions (anatomical structures) in a CT image. Median contrast across the study population is presented for four imaging modalities.

    1 week

  • CBCT Image Quality - Contrast to Noise Ratio

    Contrast to Noise Ratio (CNR) measures the ability to distinguish an object or lesion from its background. CNR = \|HU1 - HU2\|/\[0.5 (STD1 + STD2)\] where HU1 and HU2 are the mean Hounsfield Unit values in two different 100 mm\^2 ROIs, where the ROIs were located in two different tissue types that were relevant to the site being treated (e.g., in the liver and in perihepatic fat for liver treatments), and STD1 and STD2 are the standard deviations of the HU values in those same ROIs. A higher CNR makes it easier to distinguish an object from its background. CNR analysis was limited to images with similar imaging dose. Median CNR across all study participants treated for lung cancer are presented for three CBCT modalities.

    1 week

  • CBCT Image Quality - HU Similarity to CT Simulation

    The intensity of a pixel in a CT image is a function of its Hounsfield Unit (HU) value. HU is also directly related to the underlying electron density, which means that the pixel value of a CT image can be used directly in the calculation of dose for a prescribed radiation treatment plan. CT simulation scanners produce images with high HU accuracy and are regularly used for radiation treatment planning. Here, we present the difference in HU between CT simulation images and different CBCT images. ΔHU = HU\_CBCT - HU\_CTSim, where HU\_CBCT and HU\_CTSim are mean values among HU averages at 4 reference points in a CBCT image and the corresponding CT simulation image, respectively. The lower the ΔHU, the greater the HU accuracy of the CBCT image, and the greater the likelihood that CBCT imaging can be used for radiation treatment planning. Median ΔHU across the study population are presented for three different tissue types for three CBCT imaging modalities.

    1 week

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Dosimetry Calculations - Gamma Pass Rate

    1 day

  • Dosimetry Calculations - Target DVH Volume Metrics

    1 day

  • Dosimetry Calculations - Target DVH Dose Metrics

    1 day

  • Dosimetry Calculations - Breast OAR DVH Metrics

    1 day

  • Dosimetry Calculations - Lung OAR DVH Metrics

    1 day

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

High-performance CBCT imaging

EXPERIMENTAL

Two additional study imaging sets are acquired.

Device: CBCT Imaging

Interventions

Two research CBCT images will be acquired per subject.

High-performance CBCT imaging

Eligibility Criteria

Age19 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Subject is scheduled for treatment on one of the five TrueBeam platforms at the NS Health QE2 site.
  • Subject is receiving radiation therapy using a breath-hold technique (for example, lung, liver and left breast cancers).

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient is pregnant or has plans for pregnancy during the period of treatment.
  • Patient is unwilling to consent to participating to the study, or for whom informed consent is not possible.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Nova Scotia Health (QEII)

Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 2E2, Canada

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Lung NeoplasmsLiver NeoplasmsBreast Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Respiratory Tract NeoplasmsThoracic NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsLung DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesDigestive System NeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesLiver DiseasesBreast DiseasesSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Sean Davidson
Organization
Varian Medical Systems

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
GT60
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: This is a single-site study designed to generate data describing the quality and applicability of on-couch high-performance CBCT imaging for anatomy visualization and radiation treatment dosimetry planning.
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 16, 2021

First Posted

January 4, 2022

Study Start

December 20, 2022

Primary Completion

July 30, 2023

Study Completion

July 30, 2023

Last Updated

May 6, 2026

Results First Posted

May 6, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations