Evaluation of Novel Cone-Beam CT for Guidance and Adaptation of Precision Radiotherapy
1 other identifier
interventional
31
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a feasibility study investigating the image quality of a new, high-performance cone beam CT (CBCT) used for on-couch imaging during radiotherapy treatments.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable lung-cancer
Started Dec 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable lung-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 16, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 4, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 20, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 30, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 30, 2023
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 6, 2026
CompletedMay 6, 2026
April 1, 2026
7 months
December 16, 2021
March 12, 2026
April 15, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
CBCT Image Quality - Artifact Index
Artifact Index (AI) is a measurement of the strength of imaging artifact and the degree to which is affects visibility of anatomical structures in the vicinity of the artifact. Artifacts can be produced in CT and CBCT images by a number of factors, such as metal implants, gas, or breathing motion. AI = sqrt((STD\_VOI)\^2 - (STD\_background)\^2), where STD\_VOI is the standard deviation of the image Hounsfield Units in a region of interest at the location of an artifact, and STD\_background is the standard deviation of the Hounsfield Unit values in the background (i.e. in similar tissue but away from the artifact. A lower AI value indicates that the artifact has a lower impact on image quality. Artifacts were identified in all study participants. The median AI across the study population is presented for four imaging modalities.
1 day
CBCT Image Quality - Image Nonuniformity
Nonuniformity (NU) is a measure of the variation of CT image intensity in uniform tissue. NU = (HU\_max - HU\_min)/(HU\_max + HU\_min), where HU\_max and HU\_min are the maximum and minimum Hounsfield Unit values among multiple locations sampled within regions of uniform tissue that were relevant to the anatomy of interest (e.g., a uniform region of breast tissue for patients undergoing breast treatments). A lower NU represents greater uniformity of CT image intensity within a region of interest. Median NU across the study population is presented for four imaging modalities.
1 day
CBCT Image Quality - Contrast
Contrast represents the ability to distinguish between two different regions in a CT image (e.g. to distinguish between two adjacent organs). Contrast = \|HU1 - HU2\| where HU1 and HU2 are the mean HU values in two different 100 mm\^2 ROIs, where the ROIs were located in two different tissue types that were relevant to the site being treated (e.g., in the liver and in perihepatic fat for liver treatments). Higher contrast values indicate that it is easier to distinguish between regions (anatomical structures) in a CT image. Median contrast across the study population is presented for four imaging modalities.
1 week
CBCT Image Quality - Contrast to Noise Ratio
Contrast to Noise Ratio (CNR) measures the ability to distinguish an object or lesion from its background. CNR = \|HU1 - HU2\|/\[0.5 (STD1 + STD2)\] where HU1 and HU2 are the mean Hounsfield Unit values in two different 100 mm\^2 ROIs, where the ROIs were located in two different tissue types that were relevant to the site being treated (e.g., in the liver and in perihepatic fat for liver treatments), and STD1 and STD2 are the standard deviations of the HU values in those same ROIs. A higher CNR makes it easier to distinguish an object from its background. CNR analysis was limited to images with similar imaging dose. Median CNR across all study participants treated for lung cancer are presented for three CBCT modalities.
1 week
CBCT Image Quality - HU Similarity to CT Simulation
The intensity of a pixel in a CT image is a function of its Hounsfield Unit (HU) value. HU is also directly related to the underlying electron density, which means that the pixel value of a CT image can be used directly in the calculation of dose for a prescribed radiation treatment plan. CT simulation scanners produce images with high HU accuracy and are regularly used for radiation treatment planning. Here, we present the difference in HU between CT simulation images and different CBCT images. ΔHU = HU\_CBCT - HU\_CTSim, where HU\_CBCT and HU\_CTSim are mean values among HU averages at 4 reference points in a CBCT image and the corresponding CT simulation image, respectively. The lower the ΔHU, the greater the HU accuracy of the CBCT image, and the greater the likelihood that CBCT imaging can be used for radiation treatment planning. Median ΔHU across the study population are presented for three different tissue types for three CBCT imaging modalities.
1 week
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Dosimetry Calculations - Gamma Pass Rate
1 day
Dosimetry Calculations - Target DVH Volume Metrics
1 day
Dosimetry Calculations - Target DVH Dose Metrics
1 day
Dosimetry Calculations - Breast OAR DVH Metrics
1 day
Dosimetry Calculations - Lung OAR DVH Metrics
1 day
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
High-performance CBCT imaging
EXPERIMENTALTwo additional study imaging sets are acquired.
Interventions
Two research CBCT images will be acquired per subject.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subject is scheduled for treatment on one of the five TrueBeam platforms at the NS Health QE2 site.
- Subject is receiving radiation therapy using a breath-hold technique (for example, lung, liver and left breast cancers).
You may not qualify if:
- Patient is pregnant or has plans for pregnancy during the period of treatment.
- Patient is unwilling to consent to participating to the study, or for whom informed consent is not possible.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Nova Scotia Health (QEII)
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 2E2, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Sean Davidson
- Organization
- Varian Medical Systems
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- GT60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 16, 2021
First Posted
January 4, 2022
Study Start
December 20, 2022
Primary Completion
July 30, 2023
Study Completion
July 30, 2023
Last Updated
May 6, 2026
Results First Posted
May 6, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share