Real-time Ultrasound Guidance for Thoracic Epidural Blocks
Reliability of Real-time Ultrasound Guidance as an Adjunct to Loss of Resistance for Thoracic Epidural Blocks
1 other identifier
observational
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Various modalities have been proposed for real-time confirmation of loss of resistance (LOR) for thoracic epidural blocks. With real-time ultrasound (US) guidance, the anesthesiologist attempts to visualize the sonographic advancement of the epidural needle and penetration of the epidural space (as detected by LOR) This observational study is set out to confirm the reliability of real-time ultrasound guidance as an adjunct to LOR for thoracic epidural blocks.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jul 2024
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 7, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 21, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2026
December 14, 2023
December 1, 2023
2.4 years
December 7, 2021
December 13, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of successful epidural blocks after US-guided insertion of epidural catheters
After fifteen minutes of local anesthetic administration (4- mL dose of lidocaine 2% with epinephrine 5 μg/mL ), an investigator will apply ice to the T1 to L4 dermatomes bilaterally. The criterion standard for success will be the presence of an epidural block, defined as a block to ice in at least 2 dermatomes bilaterally. If operators could not advance the catheter past the needle tip after 2 attempts despite a 180-degree rotation of the bevel between the first and second attempts, epidural blocks will be considered failures.
15 minutes after the local anesthetic injection through the epidural catheter
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Number of blocked dermatomes
15 minutes after the local anesthetic injection through the epidural catheter
Localization of blocked dermatomes
15 minutes after the local anesthetic injection through the epidural catheter
Image time
Up to 30 minutes after skin disinfection
Needle time
Up to 30 minutes after skin disinfection
Catheter installation time
Up to 30 minutes after skin disinfection
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Patients undergoing elective thoracic surgery, abdominal surgery, or having rib fractures
Patients undergoing elective thoracic surgery, abdominal surgery, or having rib fractures who will have placed a thoracic epidural catheter to manage their perioperative analgesia.
Interventions
With an US-guided parasagittal oblique approach, the interlaminar space at the union between laminas and spinous processes at the predefined insertion level will be identified. A skin wheal will be raised with 3 mL of lidocaine 1%. Afterward, an 18-gauge Tuohy epidural block needle will be advanced under direct US vision until the tip is insinuated between the laminas and anchored to the flavum ligament. Then the needle will be attached to a low resistance syringe prefilled with saline solution and advanced until LOR to injection is confirmed. Then a 20-Gauge epidural catheter will be inserted 3-5 cm beyond the needle tip inside the epidural space and the needle removed.
Eligibility Criteria
Patients undergoing elective thoracic surgery, abdominal surgery, or suffering from rib fractures who will have placed a thoracic epidural catheter to manage their perioperative analgesia.
You may qualify if:
- Age between 18 and 80 years
- American Society of Anesthesiologists classification 1-3
- Body mass index between 20 and 35 (kg/m2)
You may not qualify if:
- Adults who are unable to give their own consent
- Sepsis (assessed by history and physical examination and, if deemed clinically necessary, by blood work up i.e. leukocytosis, increased c-reactive protein, increased procalcitonin)
- Coagulopathy (assessed by history and physical examination and, if deemed clinically necessary, by blood work up i.e. platelets ≤ 100, International Normalized Ratio ≥ 1.4 or prothrombin time ≥ 50)
- Allergy to local anesthetics (LAs)
- Prior surgery in the thoracic spine
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile
Santiago, Metropolitan, 8380456, Chile
Related Publications (7)
Tran DQ, Van Zundert TC, Aliste J, Engsusophon P, Finlayson RJ. Primary Failure of Thoracic Epidural Analgesia in Training Centers: The Invisible Elephant? Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 May-Jun;41(3):309-13. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000394.
PMID: 27035462BACKGROUNDTran DQ, Gonzalez AP, Bernucci F, Finlayson RJ. Confirmation of loss-of-resistance for epidural analgesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Mar-Apr;40(2):166-73. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000217. No abstract available.
PMID: 25642911BACKGROUNDLeurcharusmee P, Arnuntasupakul V, Chora De La Garza D, Vijitpavan A, Ah-Kye S, Saelao A, Tiyaprasertkul W, Finlayson RJ, Tran DQ. Reliability of Waveform Analysis as an Adjunct to Loss of Resistance for Thoracic Epidural Blocks. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Nov-Dec;40(6):694-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000313.
PMID: 26469364BACKGROUNDArnuntasupakul V, Van Zundert TC, Vijitpavan A, Aliste J, Engsusophon P, Leurcharusmee P, Ah-Kye S, Finlayson RJ, Tran DQ. A Randomized Comparison Between Conventional and Waveform-Confirmed Loss of Resistance for Thoracic Epidural Blocks. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 May-Jun;41(3):368-73. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000369.
PMID: 26894628BACKGROUNDElgueta MF, Duong S, Finlayson RJ, Tran DQ. Ultrasonography for neuraxial blocks: a review of the evidence. Minerva Anestesiol. 2017 May;83(5):512-523. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.16.11650-5. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
PMID: 27827521BACKGROUNDPak DJ, Gulati A. Real-Time Ultrasound-Assisted Thoracic Epidural Placement: A Feasibility Study of a Novel Technique. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Aug;43(6):613-615. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000761.
PMID: 29553999BACKGROUNDYeager MP, Bae EE, Parra MC, Barr PA, Bonham AK, Sites BD. Fluoroscopy-assisted epidural catheter placement: an exploratory analysis of 303 pre-operative epidurograms. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2016 Apr;60(4):513-9. doi: 10.1111/aas.12649. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
PMID: 26508378BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Julián Aliste, MD
University of Chile
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 7, 2021
First Posted
December 21, 2021
Study Start
July 1, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Last Updated
December 14, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-12