Can the SurgInfoBot Improve the Consent Process for Endoscopy? A Randomised Controlled Trial
Can an Automated Conversational Agent (the SurgInfoBot) Improve the Consent Process for Patients Undergoing Endoscopy? A Randomised Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
70
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Human-computer interactions or 'Chatbots' have been utilized in a variety of healthcare settings, including the promotion of positive healthcare behaviors, the deliverance of psychological therapy, and the performance of diagnostic tasks. Standard methods of consenting patients for procedures may not always result in patients being fully informed; a 2004 study of patients undergoing screening sigmoidoscopy demonstrated that 39% of surveyed patients could describe no other indication than doctor recommendation for the procedure after undergoing standard consent. his study seeks to investigate the usability of a novel chatbot designed to provide peri-procedural information in two endoscopic procedures - diagnostic oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD) and diagnostic colonoscopy. A novel Chatbot - 'SurgInfoBot' has been developed in order to provide real-time, patient-driven peri-procedural information. This study primarily seeks to assess the effect of SurgInfoBot use on patient satisfaction with the consent process in endoscopy. It will also assess the usability of the chatbot according to the system usability scale and test performance according to the as-yet unvalidated Chatbot Usability Questionnaire (CUX). User engagement will be analyzed objectively using stored metrics. Comparison will be made between perceptions of the SurgInfoBot as an information source and other established patient information sources. The potential impact of the SurgInfoBot on peri-procedural anxiety will also be explored.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 24, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 29, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 16, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2023
CompletedDecember 16, 2021
December 1, 2021
11 months
November 24, 2021
December 15, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Patient Satisfaction
6-point Likert scale from '---' to '+++' - 'Overall, I am satisfied with the information I received before this procedure'
Immediate (day of procedure)
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Knowledge
Immediate (Post- standard consent) and at 6 weeks, (pre-endoscopy procedure)
Knowledge (subjective)
Immediate (After provision of standard consent) and at 6 weeks (pre-endoscopy procedure)
Peri-procedural anxiety
Immediate (Day of procedure)
SurgInfoBot Usability
6 weeks (Pre-procedure)
Study Arms (2)
Standard Consent
NO INTERVENTIONStandard consent procedure: The rationale, risks, benefits, and alternatives for the intended procedure (diagnostic or screening OGD or colonoscopy) will be discussed in the outpatient clinic by a consultant general surgeon (DOK) or members of the surgical team. Patients will be given the opportunity to ask questions. All patients will receive a written information leaflet, which includes contact details for the endoscopy department should patients wish to ask further questions (supplemental data). Those undergoing colonoscopy will receive further instructions along with prescribed colonoscopy 'prep' medication by post. On the day of the procedure, patients are required to sign a standardised consent form.
Standard consent + access to an automated conversational agent (SurgInfoBot)
EXPERIMENTALPatients in the SurgInfoBot arm will be consented as above, but will also be granted access to the SurgInfoBot, which they will be invited to use between their outpatient appointment and their endoscopy procedure date. Participants will be provided with an access link and Unique Study Identifier in order to pseudonymise participant data. Participants will be able to access the SurgInfoBot as many times as they wish, and can ask any questions they see fit.
Interventions
See above under arm/group descriptions.
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Tallaght University Hospitallead
- Royal College of Surgeons, Irelandcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Tallaght University Hospital
Dublin, Ireland
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dara O Kavanagh, MCh FRCSI
Tallaght University Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER
- Masking Details
- Single-blinded. Participants will be aware of which arm they are randomised too (standard consent vs standard consent with automated conversational agent access), while those performing the endoscopy procedure (care providers) will not.
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Conultant General and Colorectal Surgeon
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 24, 2021
First Posted
December 16, 2021
Study Start
November 29, 2021
Primary Completion
November 1, 2022
Study Completion
July 1, 2023
Last Updated
December 16, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share