Brief Summary

Metal hypersensitivity is a recognized complication in some patients following total joint arthroplasty. This can result in a reaction to metal particles from the implants placed in the joint and cause tissue injury. The Evolution® NitrX™ (MicroPort Orthopaedics, Memphis, TN) knee implant was designed with the addition of a coating meant to create a barrier against the release of metal ions. The primary purpose of this study is to compare the Evolution and Evolution NitrX implant (implants your surgeon uses in total knee arthroplasty surgery). This study will compare the stability of these knee implants (any movement the implant makes after surgery) through the use of specialized xrays, called "radiostereometric analysis" (RSA for short). The investigators will also compare levels of circulating metal particles with blood draws and the effects of any circulating metal with MR imaging. The investigators will also be looking at the participants clinical outcomes using joint function and patient satisfaction questionnaires. A total of 50 patients will be enrolled into the study.

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2022

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 5, 2021

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 9, 2021

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2022

Completed
3.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 28, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

March 24, 2025

Status Verified

March 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

3.4 years

First QC Date

November 5, 2021

Last Update Submit

March 20, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Implant Migration (Tibial Component)

    Model based Radiostereometric Analysis (RSA, specialized Xrays) will be used to register the location of the tibial implant components during supine and standing exams and measure implant movement. Changes throughout the different time points of potential tibial migration, with the use of the tibial bone beads, will be measured in millimeters.

    2 years

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Implant Migration (Femoral Component)

    2 years

Other Outcomes (8)

  • Wear Rates

    2 weeks (baseline), 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years.

  • Circulating metal levels

    Pre-operative, 1 and 2 years post-operatively.

  • Synovial Joint Inflammation observation

    2 Years

  • +5 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Evolution Total Knee Arthroplasty system

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients will undergo total knee arthroplasty with the Evolution Total Knee System

Device: Total Knee Arthroplasty with Evolution Knee System

Evolution with NitrX Total Knee Arthroplasty system

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients will undergo total knee arthroplasty with the NitrX Evolution Total Knee System which has the specialized protective coating

Device: Total Knee Arthroplasty with Evolution® NitrX™ Knee System

Interventions

Patients will receive cemented Evolution knee system with NitrX coating for their total knee arthroplasty.

Evolution with NitrX Total Knee Arthroplasty system

Patients will receive cemented Evolution knee system without NitrX coating for their total knee arthroplasty.

Evolution Total Knee Arthroplasty system

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Symptomatic osteoarthritis of the knee indicating primary total knee arthroplasty
  • Varus knee deformity of 0 to 10 degrees
  • Sufficient ligamentous function to warrant retention of the posterior cruciate ligament
  • Between ages of 21 and 80 inclusive
  • Patients willing and able to comply with follow-up requirements and self-evaluations
  • Ability to give informed consent
  • No contraindications to Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

You may not qualify if:

  • Active or previous infection
  • Medical condition precluding major surgery
  • Inflammatory arthropathy
  • Prior Patellectomy
  • PCL deficiency
  • Major Coronal plane deformity
  • Valgus deformity
  • Bone defects requiring augments, cones and/or stemmed implants

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

London Health Sciences Centre

London, Ontario, N6A5A5, Canada

Location

Related Publications (11)

  • Pijls BG, Plevier JWM, Nelissen RGHH. RSA migration of total knee replacements. Acta Orthop. 2018 Jun;89(3):320-328. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2018.1443635. Epub 2018 Mar 6.

    PMID: 29508661BACKGROUND
  • Teeter MG, Marsh JD, Howard JL, Yuan X, Vasarhelyi EM, McCalden RW, Naudie DDR. A randomized controlled trial investigating the value of patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty in the Canadian healthcare system. Bone Joint J. 2019 May;101-B(5):565-572. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B5.BJJ-2018-1323.R1.

    PMID: 31038991BACKGROUND
  • Teeter MG, Thoren J, Yuan X, McCalden RW, MacDonald SJ, Lanting BA, Naudie DD. Migration of a cemented fixed-bearing, polished titanium tibial baseplate (Genesis II) at ten years : a radiostereometric analysis. Bone Joint J. 2016 May;98-B(5):616-21. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B5.36865.

    PMID: 27143731BACKGROUND
  • Teeter MG, Perry K, Yuan X, Howard JL, Lanting BA. The Effects of Resection Technique on Implant Migration in Single Radius Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Replacement. J Knee Surg. 2020 Jan;33(1):78-83. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1676462. Epub 2018 Dec 18.

    PMID: 30562833BACKGROUND
  • Sealed Envelope Ltd.2012.Power calculator for continuous outcome non0-inferiority trial.[Online] Available from: https://www.sealedenvelope.com/power/continuous-noninferios/[Accessed Thu Jan 14 2021].

    BACKGROUND
  • van Ijsseldijk EA, Valstar ER, Stoel BC, de Ridder R, Nelissen RG, Kaptein BL. Measuring polyethylene wear in total knee arthroplasty by RSA: differences between weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing positioning. J Orthop Res. 2014 Apr;32(4):613-7. doi: 10.1002/jor.22579. Epub 2014 Jan 7.

    PMID: 24395396BACKGROUND
  • Teeter MG, Wihlidal J, McCalden RW, Yuan X, MacDonald SJ, Lanting BA, Naudie DD. Radiostereometric Analysis Permits In Vivo Measurement of Very Small Levels of Wear in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Jan;477(1):80-90. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000399.

    PMID: 30794231BACKGROUND
  • Gascoyne T, Parashin S, Teeter M, Bohm E, Laende E, Dunbar M, Turgeon T. In vivo wear measurement in a modern total knee arthroplasty with model-based radiostereometric analysis. Bone Joint J. 2019 Nov;101-B(11):1348-1355. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B11.BJJ-2018-1447.R2.

    PMID: 31674253BACKGROUND
  • Koff MF, Burge AJ, Potter HG. Clinical magnetic resonance imaging of arthroplasty at 1.5 T. J Orthop Res. 2020 Jul;38(7):1455-1464. doi: 10.1002/jor.24606. Epub 2020 Feb 4.

    PMID: 31975444BACKGROUND
  • Attard V, Li CY, Self A, Mann DA, Borthwick LA, O'Connor P, Deehan DJ, Kalson NS. Quantification of intra-articular fibrosis in patients with stiff knee arthroplasties using metal-reduction MRI. Bone Joint J. 2020 Oct;102-B(10):1331-1340. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B10.BJJ-2020-0841.R1.

    PMID: 32993344BACKGROUND
  • Heyse TJ, Chong le R, Davis J, Boettner F, Haas SB, Potter HG. MRI analysis of the component-bone interface after TKA. Knee. 2012 Aug;19(4):290-4. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2011.05.011. Epub 2011 Jul 8.

    PMID: 21741843BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis, Knee

Interventions

Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

OsteoarthritisArthritisJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Arthroplasty, ReplacementArthroplastyOrthopedic ProceduresSurgical Procedures, OperativePlastic Surgery ProceduresProsthesis Implantation

Study Officials

  • Edward M Vasarhelyi, MD

    London Health Sciences Centre

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Matthew Teeter, PhD

    London Health Science Centre

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Orthopaedic Surgeon

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 5, 2021

First Posted

December 9, 2021

Study Start

August 1, 2022

Primary Completion

December 31, 2025

Study Completion

February 28, 2026

Last Updated

March 24, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations