NCT06483178

Brief Summary

The number of patients requiring knee replacements is increasing every year due to the combination of an aging population, increased patient expectancy, and rising levels of obesity. Therefore, newer implants, or design features, are introduced on a regular basis to try to improve patient outcomes. In 2013, DePuy Synthes launched the Attune Knee System to provide improved range of motion and address the unstable feeling some patients experience whilst performing everyday activities, such as going down stairs. The Attune cementless rotating platform knee was first implanted in September 2016. In 2004, the first Triathlon total knee designed by Stryker was implanted. Registry figures for both the Attune and Triathlon knees are promising with good implant longevity and outcomes. There is only a small amount of literature available on the Attune knee as it is still a relatively new implant. Worldwide, the Triathlon is widely used and is also a well-established, successful implant used in the investigators' unit. This study will help to determine whether the Attune can improve patient outcomes in terms of gait analysis assessed by walking on a treadmill, patient reported outcome measures and X-ray outcomes when compared to the Triathlon knee. 90 patients who will undergo knee replacement and meet the inclusion criteria and agree to take part will be randomly placed in one of two groups to receive either the Attune or Triathlon knee implant.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
90

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
19mo left

Started May 2025

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress39%
May 2025Dec 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 31, 2024

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 3, 2024

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2025

Completed
2.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2027

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2027

Last Updated

May 13, 2025

Status Verified

May 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2.6 years

First QC Date

January 31, 2024

Last Update Submit

May 8, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Post-operative top downhill walking speed at 9-12 months.

    Post-operative top downhill walking speed at 9-12 months will be assessed via gait analysis.

    9-12 months

Secondary Outcomes (20)

  • Ground reaction forces in the vertical plane throughout the stance phase of the gait cycle.

    9-12 months

  • Ground reaction forces in the medio lateral plane throughout the stance phase of the gait cycle.

    9-12 months

  • Ground reaction forces in the anterior posterior plane throughout the stance phase of the gait cycle.

    9-12 months

  • Gait symmetry at weight acceptance (heel strike) of the stance phase

    9-12 months

  • Gait symmetry at mid-stance of the stance phase

    9-12 months

  • +15 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Attune

EXPERIMENTAL
Device: Attune knee implant

Triathlon

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Device: Triathlon knee implant

Interventions

Attune cementless cruciate retaining rotating platform implant (DePuy Synthes) with a standard gap balancing cruciate sacrificing surgical technique

Attune

Triathlon cementless condylar stabilised implant (Stryker) with a standard gap balancing cruciate sacrificing surgical technique

Triathlon

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients aged \<65 years old who require a primary TKA for medial compartment osteoarthritis with a varus deformity.
  • On examination patients must have a pain free ROM of both hips, both ankles and the opposite knee. A history of mild pain in any of these lower limb joints that does not inhibit mobility is acceptable.
  • Must be able to walk at a pre-operative speed of at least 4 km/h (approximately 30 metres in 30 seconds).
  • Must be able to walk outside unaided or with no more than a walking stick.
  • Must be able to complete pre- and post-operative gait analysis.
  • Participants must have a functional level of spoken and written English and must have a smartphone or have access to a smartphone to complete the online questionnaires on REDCap and to take photographs for virtual assessment of ROM.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with valgus deformity of the knee.
  • Patients with previous lower limb arthroplasty.
  • Patients with previous lower limb open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF).
  • Patients who are American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) grade 3 or higher.
  • Patients who are unable to adhere to the trial protocol (due to cognitive impairment, cannot speak English or for any other reason).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Musgrave Park Hospital

Belfast, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (34)

  • Carey BW, Harty J. A comparison of clinical- and patient-reported outcomes of the cemented ATTUNE and PFC sigma fixed bearing cruciate sacrificing knee systems in patients who underwent total knee replacement with both prostheses in opposite knees. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Mar 15;13(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0757-6.

    PMID: 29544516BACKGROUND
  • Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Apr;89(4):780-5. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00222.

    PMID: 17403800BACKGROUND
  • Bonutti PM, Khlopas A, Chughtai M, Cole C, Gwam CU, Harwin SF, Whited B, Omiyi DE, Drumm JE. Unusually High Rate of Early Failure of Tibial Component in ATTUNE Total Knee Arthroplasty System at Implant-Cement Interface. J Knee Surg. 2017 Jun;30(5):435-439. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1603756. Epub 2017 Jun 7. No abstract available.

    PMID: 28591930BACKGROUND
  • Indelli PF, Pipino G, Johnson P, Graceffa A, Marcucci M. Posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty: a matched pair analysis of a classic and its evolutional design. Arthroplast Today. 2016 Aug 21;2(4):193-198. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2016.05.002. eCollection 2016 Dec.

    PMID: 28326427BACKGROUND
  • Etter K, Lerner J, Kalsekar I, de Moor C, Yoo A, Swank M. Comparative Analysis of Hospital Length of Stay and Discharge Status of Two Contemporary Primary Total Knee Systems. J Knee Surg. 2018 Jul;31(6):541-550. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1604442. Epub 2017 Aug 25.

    PMID: 28841727BACKGROUND
  • Bateman DK, Preston JS, Mennona S, Gui E, Kayiaros S. Comparison Between the Attune and PFC Sigma in Total Knee Arthroplasty: No Difference in Patellar Clunk and Crepitus or Anterior Knee Pain. Orthopedics. 2020 Nov 1;43(6):e508-e514. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20200812-05. Epub 2020 Aug 20.

    PMID: 32818287BACKGROUND
  • Kaptein BL, den Hollander P, Thomassen B, Fiocco M, Nelissen RGHH. A randomized controlled trial comparing tibial migration of the ATTUNE cemented cruciate-retaining knee prosthesis with the PFC-sigma design. Bone Joint J. 2020 Sep;102-B(9):1158-1166. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B9.BJJ-2020-0096.R1.

    PMID: 32862688BACKGROUND
  • Hauer G, Horlesberger N, Klim S, Bernhardt GA, Leitner L, Glehr M, Leithner A, Sadoghi P. Mid-term results show no significant difference in postoperative clinical outcome, pain and range of motion between a well-established total knee arthroplasty design and its successor: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Mar;29(3):827-831. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06027-z. Epub 2020 Apr 24.

    PMID: 32333057BACKGROUND
  • Hamilton WG, Brenkel IJ, Barnett SL, Allen PW, Dwyer KA, Lesko JP, Kantor SR, Clatworthy MG. Comparison of Existing and New Total Knee Arthroplasty Implant Systems From the Same Manufacturer: A Prospective, Multicenter Study. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2021 Dec 15;5(12):e21.00136. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00136.

    PMID: 34908561BACKGROUND
  • Molloy IB, Keeney BJ, Sparks MB, Paddock NG, Koenig KM, Moschetti WE, Jevsevar DS. Short term patient outcomes after total knee arthroplasty: Does the implant matter? Knee. 2019 Jun;26(3):687-699. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2019.01.018. Epub 2019 Mar 23.

    PMID: 30910627BACKGROUND
  • Chua JL, Goh GS, Liow MHL, Tay DK, Lo NN, Yeo SJ. Modern TKA implants are equivalent to traditional TKA implants in functional and patellofemoral joint-related outcomes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Apr;27(4):1116-1123. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5161-6. Epub 2018 Sep 29.

    PMID: 30269170BACKGROUND
  • Staats K, Wannmacher T, Weihs V, Koller U, Kubista B, Windhager R. Modern cemented total knee arthroplasty design shows a higher incidence of radiolucent lines compared to its predecessor. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Apr;27(4):1148-1155. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5130-0. Epub 2018 Sep 22.

    PMID: 30244340BACKGROUND
  • Ranawat CS, White PB, West S, Ranawat AS. Clinical and Radiographic Results of Attune and PFC Sigma Knee Designs at 2-Year Follow-Up: A Prospective Matched-Pair Analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2017 Feb;32(2):431-436. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.07.021. Epub 2016 Aug 9.

    PMID: 27600300BACKGROUND
  • Song SJ, Park CH, Liang H, Kang SG, Park JJ, Bae DK. Comparison of Clinical Results and Injury Risk of Posterior Tibial Cortex Between Attune and Press Fit Condylar Sigma Knee Systems. J Arthroplasty. 2018 Feb;33(2):391-397. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.09.056. Epub 2017 Oct 6.

    PMID: 29066248BACKGROUND
  • Saffarini M, Demey G, Nover L, Dejour D. Evolution of trochlear compartment geometry in total knee arthroplasty. Ann Transl Med. 2016 Jan;4(1):7. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2015.12.53.

    PMID: 26855943BACKGROUND
  • Webb JE, Yang HY, Collins JE, Losina E, Thornhill TS, Katz JN. The Evolution of Implant Design Decreases the Incidence of Lateral Release in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2017 May;32(5):1505-1509. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.11.050. Epub 2016 Dec 14.

    PMID: 28089467BACKGROUND
  • Martin JR, Jennings JM, Watters TS, Levy DL, McNabb DC, Dennis DA. Femoral Implant Design Modification Decreases the Incidence of Patellar Crepitus in Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2017 Apr;32(4):1310-1313. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.11.025. Epub 2016 Nov 22.

    PMID: 28012722BACKGROUND
  • Toomey SD, Daccach JA, Shah JC, Himden SE, Lesko JP, Hamilton WG. Comparative Incidence of Patellofemoral Complications Between 2 Total Knee Arthroplasty Systems in a Multicenter, Prospective Clinical Study. J Arthroplasty. 2017 Sep;32(9S):S187-S192. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.04.014. Epub 2017 Apr 20.

    PMID: 28600108BACKGROUND
  • Berahmani S, Hendriks M, Wolfson D, Wright A, Janssen D, Verdonschot N. Experimental pre-clinical assessment of the primary stability of two cementless femoral knee components. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017 Nov;75:322-329. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.07.043. Epub 2017 Jul 27.

    PMID: 28779696BACKGROUND
  • Behrend H, Zdravkovic V, Bosch M, Hochreiter B. No difference in joint awareness after TKA: a matched-pair analysis of a classic implant and its evolutional design. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Jul;27(7):2124-2129. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05407-4. Epub 2019 Feb 14.

    PMID: 30767068BACKGROUND
  • Behrend H, Hochreiter B, Potocnik P, El Baz Y, Zdravkovic V, Tomazi T. No difference in radiolucent lines after TKA: a matched-pair analysis of the classic implant and its evolutional design. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Dec;28(12):3962-3968. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-05894-w. Epub 2020 Feb 15.

    PMID: 32062683BACKGROUND
  • Bruggenjurgen B, Muehlendyck C, Gador LV, Katzer A. Length of stay after introduction of a new total knee arthroplasty (TKA)-results of a German retrospective database analysis. Med Devices (Auckl). 2019 Aug 7;12:245-251. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S191529. eCollection 2019.

    PMID: 31496839BACKGROUND
  • Keogh CJ, Mulcahy D, Reidy D, Beverland DE, Harty JA. Polyethylene spinout in the Attune(R) Cruciate-Retaining Rotating-Platform (CR RP) total knee arthroplasty performed with a cruciate-sacrificing and measured-resection technique. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2020 Jul 22;32(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s43019-020-00057-0.

    PMID: 32698908BACKGROUND
  • Giaretta S, Berti M, Micheloni GM, Ceccato A, Marangoni F, Momoli A. Early experience with the ATTUNE Total Knee Replacement System. Acta Biomed. 2019 Oct 29;90(12-S):98-103. doi: 10.23750/abm.v90i12-S.8997.

    PMID: 31821292BACKGROUND
  • List R, Schutz P, Angst M, Ellenberger L, Datwyler K, Ferguson SJ; Writing Committee. Videofluoroscopic Evaluation of the Influence of a Gradually Reducing Femoral Radius on Joint Kinematics During Daily Activities in Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2020 Oct;35(10):3010-3030. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.05.039. Epub 2020 May 27.

    PMID: 32564968BACKGROUND
  • Wiik AV, Aqil A, Tankard S, Amis AA, Cobb JP. Downhill walking gait pattern discriminates between types of knee arthroplasty: improved physiological knee functionality in UKA versus TKA. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Jun;23(6):1748-55. doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-3240-x. Epub 2014 Aug 27.

    PMID: 25160471BACKGROUND
  • Beard DJ, Davies LJ, Cook JA, MacLennan G, Price A, Kent S, Hudson J, Carr A, Leal J, Campbell H, Fitzpatrick R, Arden N, Murray D, Campbell MK; TOPKAT Study Group. The clinical and cost-effectiveness of total versus partial knee replacement in patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis (TOPKAT): 5-year outcomes of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2019 Aug 31;394(10200):746-756. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31281-4. Epub 2019 Jul 17.

    PMID: 31326135BACKGROUND
  • Stoddard JE, Deehan DJ, Bull AM, McCaskie AW, Amis AA. The kinematics and stability of single-radius versus multi-radius femoral components related to mid-range instability after TKA. J Orthop Res. 2013 Jan;31(1):53-8. doi: 10.1002/jor.22170. Epub 2012 Jun 13.

    PMID: 22696446BACKGROUND
  • Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998 Jan;80(1):63-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.80b1.7859.

    PMID: 9460955BACKGROUND
  • Scott CEH, MacDonald DJ, Howie CR. 'Worse than death' and waiting for a joint arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2019 Aug;101-B(8):941-950. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B8.BJJ-2019-0116.R1.

    PMID: 31362549BACKGROUND
  • Behrend H, Giesinger K, Giesinger JM, Kuster MS. The "forgotten joint" as the ultimate goal in joint arthroplasty: validation of a new patient-reported outcome measure. J Arthroplasty. 2012 Mar;27(3):430-436.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.06.035. Epub 2011 Oct 13.

    PMID: 22000572BACKGROUND
  • Feller JA, Bartlett RJ, Lang DM. Patellar resurfacing versus retention in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996 Mar;78(2):226-8.

    PMID: 8666630BACKGROUND
  • Robinson RO, Herzog W, Nigg BM. Use of force platform variables to quantify the effects of chiropractic manipulation on gait symmetry. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1987 Aug;10(4):172-6.

    PMID: 2958572BACKGROUND
  • O'Rourke MR, Callaghan JJ, Goetz DD, Sullivan PM, Johnston RC. Osteolysis associated with a cemented modular posterior-cruciate-substituting total knee design : five to eight-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002 Aug;84(8):1362-71. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200208000-00011.

    PMID: 12177266BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis, Knee

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

OsteoarthritisArthritisJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic Diseases

Study Officials

  • Richard Napier

    Belfast Health and Social Care Trust

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: A single centred, parallel group, randomised controlled trial
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 31, 2024

First Posted

July 3, 2024

Study Start

May 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Last Updated

May 13, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations