Outcome After Laparoscopic Surgery for Peptic Ulcer Perforation
Whether Peritoneal Irrigation Intra-operatively Effects on the Outcome After Laparoscopic Surgery for Peptic Ulcer Perforation
1 other identifier
observational
150
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Despite advances in laparoscopic surgery for perforated peptic ulcer (PPU), intra-abdominal abscess (IAA) is recognized as one of the commonly reported complications with relation to the extent of infectious abdominal contamination. Herein, the investigators report their experience of laparoscopic surgery for PPU with/without peritoneal irrigation and discuss postoperative outcome. The investigators retrospectively examined the electronic medical records of the patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for perforated peptic ulcer at a single medical center in Taiwan between January 2013 and August 2021. Retrospectively, the investigators would include those patients with clinical diagnosis of PPU who underwent emergent laparoscopic surgery. The patients with previous abdominal surgery, pathologic confirmed malignant ulcer perforation or concomitant ulcer bleeding were excluded. The investigators focused on post-operative complications and outcome after laparoscopic surgery with or without peritoneal irrigation. This information can be important in improving surgical options with respect to risk and potential benefits in this setting.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jan 2013
Longer than P75 for all trials
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 31, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 31, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 5, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 7, 2021
CompletedDecember 7, 2021
November 1, 2021
8.7 years
November 5, 2021
November 23, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Short-term outcome with wound infection, pneumonia, leakage, and intraabdominal abscess
Complication grading used clavien dindo classification
Through hospitalization, an average of 8 days
Study Arms (2)
Irrigation group
Suction only group
Interventions
For patients allocated to the irrigation group, peritoneal lavage was performed at the surgeon's discretion based on surgical findings and preference.
In the suction only group, one surgical gauze each was placed in the splenophrenic space and Morison's pouch to soak up any remaining purulent fluid followed by turning the patient into the Trendelenburg position for inspection of the lower abdominal cavity. Any interloop adhesions were carefully divided and the gauze-wiping maneuver was used to soak up the residual peritoneal fluid, and all bowel loops were investigated to the root of the mesentery.
Eligibility Criteria
From October 2012 to February 2021, 688 patients presented to the emergency room with a clinical diagnosis of PPU underwent surgery in our hospital. Five hundred and ninety-seven patients were operated in an open approach including 21 patients who were given laparoscopic surgery initially but then intraoperatively converted to laparotomy because the large perforation site cannot be primarily repaired, or the perforation site was difficult to identified or approached. The remaining 91 patients who underwent laparoscopic repair were included in this study.
You may qualify if:
- The patients with clinical diagnosis of PPU underwent laparoscopic repair surgery.
You may not qualify if:
- The patients received surgery in an open approach or underwent laparoscopy initially but then intraoperatively converted to laparotomy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Chang Wei-Junglead
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lien-Cheng Tsao, M.D.
Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, 500, Taiwan
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Sponsor-Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 5, 2021
First Posted
December 7, 2021
Study Start
January 1, 2013
Primary Completion
August 31, 2021
Study Completion
August 31, 2021
Last Updated
December 7, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-11