Experimental Intervention on the Influence of Six Weeks' Content Knowledge on Students' Written Test Achievement

NCT05139407 | Completed DMC

• 1 other identifier: Yongqi Gao
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 26
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

Brief Summary . This experiment aims to use two different teaching methods to intervene in students' learning and find out which teaching method is more conducive to improving students' written test achievement. The experiment will use a 6-the investigator seek workshop intervention to enhance students' written test achievement. The investigation is divided into workshop groups and standard teaching groups. The most significant difference better investigators the two groups are that the workshop group has oral links and guarantees. The similarities between investigators in the two groups are teacher qualifications, intervention time, content, and research objects. Based on content knowledge learning, content knowledge is divided into six categories for detailed intervention. First, the investigators will do a 6-the investigator seek intervention for two groups (workshop style and standard teaching style). The difference better investigators two is whether there is a video teaching link, and the same is that there are oral links. The entire experiment was carried out in the classroom with the school's consent. Use written exams to check student scores. Students have special teachers responsible for teaching specific content knowledge during class, standard learning after class does not require special care, and the experiment is not risky. Hypothesis including as follow:1 ) General Hypothesis. There is no significant difference in the written test results of the prior theoretical knowledge 、health promotion knowledge、 physical exercise knowledge control group, with experimental group performance among PE students in China. 2) Specific Hypothesis. The specific hypothesis of this study is to investigate the effect of a 6-weeks content knowledge workshop on written test performance among PE students in China. The detailed hypothesis is: There is no significant difference between the control and experimental groups in the sports training design、the teaching design 、the muscle function system、the exercise physiology、the competition venue planning、the referee rules written test performance among PE students in China.

Conditions

Educational Problems; Student Burnout

Keywords

Content knowledge; Written test perfofmance; Students

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• Students' written test achievements

  Primary outcome measure information: students' content knowledge, the higher the students' written test achievement, the more significant the intervention. Title: Name of the specific primary outcome measure-written test. Description: Overview of Six parts content measurement. i.Measurement before Ist week and Measurement after the sixth week ii. Overall sample was written test achievements written test is 100, and the time of each test is 2 hours. Time Frame,1-6 weeks, Used in the written test achievement Calculation for each primary outcome measure Including one basketball lesson training plan in the first week, one basketball lesson plan in the second week, Energy supply in muscle exercise in the third week, Exercise prescription in the fourth week, The fifth week of Track and field venue planning and the sixth week of Track Meet rules. Each content knowledge measurement includes oral examination performance must be over 95, and each measurement time is 90 minutes.

  1 week -7 weeks

Study Arms (2)

Workshop

EXPERIMENTAL

The workshop is to discuss methods in various fields through activities, discussions, and lectures. It is an academic way to encourage participation, innovation, and predict solutions, suitable for people from different positions and ethnic groups to think, discuss, and communicate. Each Intervention includes information relevant to how the Intervention was administered to participants in the associated Arm. Workshop intervention for students: basketball training plan, basketball lesson plan, energy supply in muscle exercise, exercise prescription, track, and field mapping, basketball rules. All patients were intervened according to the frequency of 3 hours/once a week.

Diagnostic Test: Teaching intervention

Oral examination

EXPERIMENTAL

The oral examination is a way of examination, which requires the examination to answer questions orally. Content intervention includes the comment, teacher's question and answer, proposition explanation, and proposition debate. In addition, each Intervention provides information relevant to how the Intervention was administered to students in the associated Arm. Specific interventions for students: basketball training plan, basketball lesson plan, energy supply system, exercise prescription formulation, track and field venue planning, basketball game rules. All oral examinations take 90 minutes/once/week.

Diagnostic Test: Teaching intervention

Interventions

Teaching intervention DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Different teaching methods are used to teach the experimental group and the control array in the classroom.

Oral examination; Workshop

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 21 Years - 23 Years
• Gender Eligibility Details: Random, unlimited
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

• Students whose age meets the requirements.
• Students majoring in physical education in Ningxia University.
• Students who voluntarily participate and pass the qualification assessment.
• Students who can complete the experimental intervention plan.
• Students who have not participated in the examination and training.

You may not qualify if:

• Drop out be absent with leave、refuse to participate;
• Students who are often absent from school and late.
• Students who have already taken the exam.
• Not a college student in Ningxia University.

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Universiti Putra Malaysia: lead

Study Sites (1)

China, Ningxia ,Ningxia University

Yingchuan, Ningxia, 756000, China

Location

Related Links

• Related Info

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Burnout, Psychological

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Stress, Psychological; Behavioral Symptoms; Behavior

Study Officials

• YONGQI GAO

  Universiti Putra Malaysia

  PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: TRIPLE
• Who Masked: PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
• Masking Details: Individual trials cannot be made public before publication
• Purpose: OTHER
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: August 28, 2021
• First Posted: December 1, 2021
• Study Start: February 10, 2021
• Primary Completion: June 10, 2021
• Study Completion: August 10, 2021
• Last Updated: December 1, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-11

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will not share

Locations

CN (1)