Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Cenegermin (Oxervate®) vs Vehicle in Severe Sjogren's Dry Eye Disease
PROTEGO-2
4-week,Phase III, Multicenter, Double-masked Clinical Study to Evaluate Safety-efficacy of Cenegermin (Oxervate®) 20 mcg/mL Ophthalmic Solution vs Vehicle in Patients With Severe Sjogren's Dry Eye Treated With Cyclosporine A (PROTEGO-2).
2 other identifiers
interventional
85
2 countries
10
Brief Summary
Primary Objectives:
- To compare the efficacy of cenegermin vs vehicle in Schirmer I test (without anaesthesia) \> 10 mm/5 min at Week 4 by testing the superiority.
- To compare the efficacy of cenegermin vs vehicle in Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye questionnaire (SANDE) global score at Week 12 by testing the superiority. Secondary Objectives:
- To compare the efficacy of cenegermin vs vehicle in Schirmer I test at Week 4, 8, 12 and 16 by testing the superiority.
- To compare the efficacy of cenegermin vs vehicle in Cornea and conjunctiva vital staining with fluorescein (National Eye Institute \[NEI\] scales) at Week 4, 8, 12 and 16 by testing the superiority.
- To compare the efficacy of cenegermin vs vehicle in Tear Film Break-Up Time (TFBUT) at Week 4, 8, 12 and 16 by testing the superiority.
- To compare the efficacy of cenegermin vs vehicle in SANDE scores at Week 8, 12 and 16 by testing the superiority.
- To compare the efficacy of cenegermin vs vehicle in worsening in symptom scores (SANDE) and/or NEI score at Week 4 by testing the superiority.
- To compare the efficacy of cenegermin vs vehicle in impact of dry eye on everyday life (IDEEL) questionnaire at Week 4, 8, 12 and 16 by testing the superiority.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Jan 2022
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
10 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 15, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 29, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 27, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 24, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 24, 2023
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 4, 2024
CompletedNovember 26, 2025
November 1, 2025
1.3 years
November 15, 2021
June 7, 2024
November 20, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Number of Patients With Schirmer I Test (Without Anesthesia) >10mm/5min in the Eligible Eye at Week 4
The Schirmer test was used in ophthalmic examination to measure tear production for the diagnosis of conditions such as keratoconjunctivitis sicca and dry eye. Without previously instilling anesthetic drops, the Schirmer strip was inserted into the lower conjunctival sac at the junction of the lateral and middle thirds, avoiding touching the cornea, and the length of wetting strips in millimeters was recorded after 5 minutes. After 5 minutes had elapsed, the Schirmer's test strip was removed and the length of the tear absorption on the strip was measured (millimeters/5 minutes). Cutoff values: \<5 mm - pathologic dry eye 5-10 mm - marginal dry eye \>10 and \<30 mm - normal secretion The longer, the wetted length, the healthier the status of the eye. No units other than participants were assigned.
At Week 4 (Visit 3)
Change From Baseline in Symptom Questionnaire (SANDE) Global Score at Week 12
SANDE was a short questionnaire to evaluate both dry eye intensity and frequency. It uses a 100 mm horizontal line (Visual Analogue Scale - VAS), for each of the 2 questions, to assess ocular discomfort and/or dryness. Frequency of symptoms ranged from "rarely" (best outcome) to "all of the time" (worst outcome), while the severity of symptoms ranged from "very mild" (best outcome) to "very severe" (worst outcome). Patients had to place a mark on the two given lines based on the extent of their symptoms. The locations of the marks was measured in mm from left to right and recorded as frequency and severity scores, respectively. The SANDE lines for intensity and for severity ranged from 0, being the minimal amount of dry eye symptoms (best outcome) to 100, being the maximal amount of dry eye symptoms (worst outcome). The total SANDE score was calculated by multiplying the frequency score by the severity score and obtaining the square root (0-100; the lower, the better).
At Week 12 (Visit 5 - Follow up)
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Key Secondary Outcome: Number of Patients With Schirmer I Test (Without Anesthesia) >10mm/5min at Week 8
At Week 8 (Visit 4)
Key Secondary Outcome: Change From Baseline in Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye Questionnaire (SANDE) Score for Severity at Week 12
At Week 12 (Visit 5 - Follow-up)
Key Secondary Outcome: Change From Baseline in Symptoms Assessment in Dry Eye Questionnaire (SANDE) Score for Frequency at Week 12
At Week 12 (Visit 5 - Follow-up)
Key Secondary Outcome: Change From Baseline in "Quality of Life, Dry Eye Treatment Satisfaction & Bother and Dry Eye Symptom-Bother" Modules Measured by "Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Life [IDEEL]" Questionnaire at Week 12 and at Week 4.
At Week 12 (Visit 5 - Follow-up) and Week 4 (Visit 3)
Key Secondary Outcome: Change From Baseline in Tear Film Break-Up Time (TFBUT) at Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12
At week 4 (Visit 3) , Week 8 (Visit 4), and Week 12 (Visit 5 - Follow-up)
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (9)
Number of Patients With at Least One Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) From Screening Day to Week 24
From Screening day (Day -8) up to Week 24 (Visit 7 - Follow-up)
Use of Preservative Free Artificial Tears Use (Number of Drops/Day).
Treatment period (Day 1 to Week 4), Follow-up period (Week 4 to Week 24), Overall period (Day 1 to Week 24)
Change From Baseline in Schirmer I Test (Without Anaesthesia) at Week 2
At week 2 (Visit 2)
- +6 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Cenegermin
EXPERIMENTALOne drop of cenegermin 20 mcg/mL (rhNGF 20 mcg/mL), in the pharmaceutical form of ophthalmic sterile solution, was instilled in both eyes three times daily (TID), every six hours.
Vehicle
PLACEBO COMPARATORIn this arm one drop of vehicle was instilled in both eyes TID for 28 consecutive days.
Interventions
Oxervate®, an ophthalmic solution containing cenegermin 20 mcg/mL, which is a recombinant human Nerve Growth Factor (rhNGF); one drop of the test product will be instilled in both eyes three times daily (TID) for 28 consecutive days.
Vehicle was instilled with the same scheme of the test product
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female aged ≥ 18 years.
- Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of Sjögren's syndrome or other autoimmune disease known to induce Sjögren's DED.
- Patients with severe Sjögren's DED characterized by the following clinical features:
- Corneal and/or conjunctival staining with fluorescein using National Eye Institute (NEI) grading system ≥ 3.
- SANDE questionnaire \>25 mm.
- Schirmer test I (without anaesthesia) ≥ 2 ≤ 5 mm/5 min.
- The same eye (eligible eye) must fulfil all the above criteria.
- Patients diagnosed with severe Sjögren's DED at least 3 months before enrolment (current use or recommended use of artificial tears for the treatment of Sjögren's related DE).
- Best corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) score of ≥ 0.1 decimal units (20/200 Snellen value) in each eye at the time of study enrolment.
- If a female of childbearing potential, have a negative urine pregnancy test and use a highly effective method to avoid pregnancy for the duration of the trial and 30 days after the study treatment period. Males of reproductive potential should use effective contraception during treatment and 30 days after the study treatment period.
- Patients who have given written informed consent before any study-related procedures not part of standard medical care are performed.
- Patients must have the ability and willingness to comply with study procedures.
- Patients under treatment with topical cyclosporine (CsA), or topical ophthalmic treatments of the same class for at least 30 days before Screening Visit (Day -8).
You may not qualify if:
- Inability to speak and understand the local language sufficiently to understand the nature of the study, to provide written informed consent, and to allow the completion of all study assessments.
- Evidence of an active ocular infection, in either eye.
- Presence of any other ocular disorder or condition requiring topical medication during the entire duration of study in either eye.
- History of severe systemic allergy or of ocular allergy (including seasonal conjunctivitis) or chronic conjunctivitis and/or keratitis other than dry eye.
- Intraocular inflammation defined as Tyndall score \> 0.
- History of malignancy in the last 5 years.
- Systemic disease not stabilized within 1 month before Screening Visit (e.g., diabetes with glycemia out of range, thyroid malfunction) or judged by the Investigator to be incompatible with the study (e.g., current systemic infections) or with a condition incompatible with the frequent assessment required by the study.
- Patient had a serious adverse reaction or significant hypersensitivity to any drug or chemically related compounds or had a clinically significant allergy to drugs, foods, amide local anaesthetics or other materials including commercial artificial tears (in the opinion of the Investigator).
- Females of childbearing potential (those who are not surgically sterilized or post-menopausal for at least 1 year) were excluded from participation in the study if they met any one of the following conditions:
- were currently pregnant or,
- had a positive result at the urine pregnancy test (Baseline/Day 1) or,
- intended to become pregnant during the study treatment period or,
- were breast-feeding or,
- were not willing to use highly effective birth control measures, such as: combined (oestrogen and progesterone containing) hormonal contraceptives associated with inhibition of ovulation (oral, intravaginal, transdermal), progestogen-only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation (oral, implantable, injectable), intrauterine device (IUD), intrauterine hormone-releasing system (IUS), bilateral tubal occlusion, vasectomised partner, sexual abstinence - during the entire course of and 30 days after the study treatment period.
- Any concurrent medical condition, that in the judgment of the PI, might interfere with the conduct of the study, confound the interpretation of the study results, or endanger the patient's well-being.
- +4 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (10)
Lugene Eye Institute - Glendale Office
Glendale, California, 91204, United States
The Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, Maryland, 21218, United States
Tufts University School of Medicine (TUSM) - New England Eye Center/Tufts Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02111, United States
OCLI (Ophthalmic Consultants of Long Island)
Garden City, New York, 11530, United States
Scheie Eye Institute
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
Houston Eye Associates HEA - Gramercy Location
Houston, Tennessee, 77025, United States
Toyos Clinic - Nashville
Nashville, Tennessee, 37215, United States
AOU Gaspare Rodolico - Ospedale San Marco
Catania, 95123, Italy
Università degli Studi di Milano - Ospedale San Giuseppe - UO Oculistica
Milan, 20123, Italy
AOU Policlinico Umberto I - Dipartimento Organi di Senso - Clinica Oculistica
Roma, 00161, Italy
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Clinical Development & Operations
- Organization
- Dompé farmaceutici S.p.A.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Flavio Mantelli, MD
Dompé Farmaceutici
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- This was a double-blind study.The vials containing cenegermin (20 mcg/mL) or vehicle were identical in appearance, and the contents of the vials were indistinguishable. All staff directly involved in the analysis of study results remained masked to treatment assignments while the study was in progress. The blind was not broken for any patient during the study before the database lock.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 15, 2021
First Posted
November 29, 2021
Study Start
January 27, 2022
Primary Completion
May 24, 2023
Study Completion
May 24, 2023
Last Updated
November 26, 2025
Results First Posted
December 4, 2024
Record last verified: 2025-11