Ultrasound Guided Peripheral Venous Cannulation in Patient Undergoing Elective Surgery Under General Anesthesia.

NCT05119985 | Completed

• 1 other identifier: USG kanylace pžk
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 860
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

This study evaluates two different techniques for peripheral venous cannulation in operating theatre. Ultrasound guided insertion of peripheral cannula in comparison with conventional approach without any ultrasound guidance.

Conditions

Peripheral Vein Cannulation Guided by Ultrasound

Keywords

ultrasound; vein; cannulation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• Number of Participants with Successful Securing of Peripheral Vein on First Attempt

  Comparing success rate of securing peripheral vein for first attempt in both methods.

  60 minutes

Secondary Outcomes (3)

• Number of Needed Attempts to Successful Securing of Peripheral

  60 minutes

• Number of Complication After and During Securing Peripheral Vein

  24 hours

• Time Needed to Secure Peripheral Vein

  60 minutes

Study Arms (2)

Ultrasound guided cannulation

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Ultrasound guided insertion of peripheral vein cannula.

Procedure: Peripheral vein cannulation

Cannulation without ultrasound

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Catheter insertion by conventional approach, without ultrasound guidance

Procedure: Cannulation without ultrasound

Interventions

Peripheral vein cannulation PROCEDURE

The target vein is directly identified by ultrasound, the procedure of peripheral venous catheter insertion is performed conventionally, without ultrasound guidance

Ultrasound guided cannulation

Cannulation without ultrasound PROCEDURE

Cannulation is done the conventional way without any ultrasound use.

Cannulation without ultrasound

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years+
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

• Age over 18 years

You may not qualify if:

• Age \<18 years
• Patient disagreement with the insertion of peripheral venous catheter
• Contraindication of ultrasound examination of the venous system
• Contraindication of the introduction of peripheral venous cannula on both upper limbs
• Necessity of securing other vein access than peripheral
• Contraindications of cannulation of peripheral vein

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Masarykova Nemocnice v Usti nad Labem, Krajska Zdravotni a.s.: lead
• Masaryk Hospital Usti nad Labem: collaborator

Study Sites (1)

Masarykova Nemocnice v Ústí nad Labem, Krajská Zdravotní a.s.

Ústí nad Labem, Ústí Nad Labem Region, 40001, Czechia

Location

Related Publications (1)

• Tada M, Yamada N, Matsumoto T, Takeda C, Furukawa TA, Watanabe N. Ultrasound guidance versus landmark method for peripheral venous cannulation in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Dec 12;12(12):CD013434. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013434.pub2.

  PMID: 36507736 DERIVED

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Catheterization; High-Energy Shock Waves

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Therapeutics; Investigative Techniques; Ultrasonic Waves; Sound; Radiation, Nonionizing; Radiation; Physical Phenomena

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: NONE
• Purpose: SUPPORTIVE CARE
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: MUDr.

Model Details: Participants are divided by block randomization into two arms. Arm A peripheral vein cannulation with ultrasound guidance and Arm B conventional cannulation.

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: November 2, 2021
• First Posted: November 15, 2021
• Study Start: December 1, 2021
• Primary Completion: December 15, 2022
• Study Completion: December 15, 2022
• Last Updated: December 20, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-12

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will not share

Locations

CZ (1)