Remifentanil Effect-site Prediction by Algometry
Remifentanil Pharmacodynamics During Conscious Sedation From the Algometry Perspective. An Essential Standpoint to be Considered in Opioids Time-course Modelling Validation
1 other identifier
observational
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study validates the pharmacodynamic analgesic predictions (effect) given by Minto's remifentanil pharmacokinetic and dynamic model in conscious sedation. This standard model is based on the electroencephalogram (EEG) changes induced by this opioid as a proxy for describing the remifentanil analgesic effect, which might be only valid for high concentrations. Validation of the standard remifentanil model for low concentrations under sedation is needed for safer remifentanil administration.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Mar 2017
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 15, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 15, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 10, 2021
CompletedNovember 10, 2021
October 1, 2021
3.2 years
September 15, 2021
November 1, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (11)
Pressure pain threshold (PPT) Baseline
Measurement of pressure pain threshold (0 - 1.000 kPa) by algometry before starting the administration of remifentanil.
Baseline
Pressure pain threshold (PPT) 1.5 minutes
Measurement of pressure pain threshold (0 - 1.000 kPa) by algometry 1.5 minutes after starting the administration of remifentanil.
1.5 minutes
Pressure pain threshold (PPT) 5 minutes
Measurement of pressure pain threshold (0 - 1.000 kPa) by algometry 5 minutes after starting the administration of remifentanil.
5 minutes
Pressure pain threshold (PPT) 10 minutes
Measurement of pressure pain threshold (0 - 1.000 kPa) by algometry 10 minutes after starting the administration of remifentanil.
10 minutes
Pressure pain threshold (PPT) 15 minutes
Measurement of pressure pain threshold(0 - 1.000 kPa) by algometry 15 minutes after starting the administration of remifentanil.
15 minutes
Pressure pain threshold (PPT) 18 minutes
Measurement of pressure pain threshold (0 - 1.000 kPa) by algometry 18 minutes after starting the administration of remifentanil.
18 minutes
Pressure pain threshold (PPT) 20 minutes
Measurement of pressure pain threshold (0 - 1.000 kPa) by algometry 20 minutes after starting the administration of remifentanil.
20 minutes
Pressure pain threshold (PPT) 25 minutes
Measurement of pressure pain threshold (0 - 1.000 kPa) by algometry 25 minutes after starting the administration of remifentanil.
25 minutes
Infusion rate
Remifentanil infusion rate (ml/h) administered during the experiment to the patient provided by the TCI system.
Continous measurements every 1 second for the whole experiment of 25 minutes
Remifentanil Plasma Concentration (Cp)
Patient's remifentanil plasma concentration (ng/ml) evolution during the experiment given by Minto's model implemented in the TCI system.
Continous measurements every 1 second for the whole experiment of 25 minutes
Remifentanil Effect Concentration (Ce)
Patient's remifentanil effect concentration (ng/ml) evolution during the experiment given by Minto's model implemented in the TCI system.
Continous measurements every 1 second for the whole experiment of 25 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (23)
Age
Single annotation.
Mean arterial pressure (MAP) Baseline
Baseline
Mean arterial pressure (MAP) 1.5 min
1.5 minutes
Mean arterial pressure (MAP) 5 min
5 minutes
Mean arterial pressure (MAP) 10 min
10 minutes
- +18 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Group I TCI effect-site target infusion of 1.5 ng/ml of remifentanil
Group I of 35 patients received a constant TCI effect-site target infusion of 1.5 ng/ml of remifentanil for 25 min.
Group II TCI effect-site target infusion of 1.5 ng/ml of remifentanil + 1 mg Midazolam iv
Group II of 35 patients received a constant TCI effect-site target infusion of 1.5 ng/ml of remifentanil for 25 min with a bolus of 1 mg of midazolam previous to the remifentanil infusion
Group III Control
Group III of 30 patients. The same TCI system provided the saline solution in the control group under an equivalent simulation profile to the remifentanil administration
Interventions
Group I TCI effect-site target infusion of 1.5 ng/ml of remifentanil.
Group II TCI effect-site target infusion of 1.5 ng/ml of remifentanil + 1 mg Midazolam iv
The algometry technique is used to assess the pain pressure threshold as an analgesic effect of remifentanil concerning Minto's model prediction.
Eligibility Criteria
We enrolled 100 female patients scheduled for benign gynaecological surgery. A group of 35 patients received a constant TCI effect-site target infusion of 1.5 ng/ml of remifentanil for 25 min. The second group of 35 followed the same protocol with a bolus of 1 mg of midazolam previous to the remifentanil infusion to evaluate potential anxiolysis effects. The rest configured to the control group. Algometry was used to quantify pressure pain thresholds regarding basal measurements at time-points of 1.5, 5, 10, 15, 18, 20, and 25 min after induction began beside the blood pressure and heart rate.
You may qualify if:
- Female patients scheduled for benign gynaecological surgery
- years old
- ASA I-III
You may not qualify if:
- Morbid obesity
- Conduct disorder or anxiety-depressive syndrome
- Chronic treatment with psychotropic drugs or opiates
- Pregnancy
- Alcohol abuse
- Documented allergy to remifentanil or midazolam
- Refusal to participate in the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ana Abad-Torrent
Barcelona, 08035, Spain
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ana Abad-Torrent, M.D
University Vall d'Hebron Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 15, 2021
First Posted
November 10, 2021
Study Start
March 1, 2017
Primary Completion
May 15, 2020
Study Completion
September 30, 2020
Last Updated
November 10, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-10